Abstract
Spinal dysraphism or neural tube defects (NTD) encompass a heterogeneous group of congenital spinal anomalies that result from the defective closure of the neural tube early in gestation with anomalous development of the caudal cell mass. Advances in ultrasound and MRI have dramatically improved the diagnosis and therapy of spinal dysraphism and caudal spinal anomalies both prenatally and postnatally. Advances in prenatal US including high frequency linear transducers and three dimensional imaging can provide detailed information concerning spinal anomalies. MR imaging is a complementary tool that can further elucidate spine abnormalities as well as associated central nervous system and non-CNS anomalies. Recent studies have suggested that 3-D CT can help further assess fetal spine anomalies in the third trimester. With the advent of fetal therapy including surgery, accurate prenatal diagnosis of open and closed spinal dysraphism becomes critical in appropriate counselling and perinatal management.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Naidich T et al (2002) Congenital anomalies of the spine and spinal cord-embryology and malformations. In: Atlas SW (ed) Magnetic resonance imaging of the brain and spine, 3rd edn. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 1527–1631
Tortori-Donati P, Rossi A, Cama A (2000) Spinal dysraphism: a review of neuroradiological features with embryological correlations and proposal for a new classification. Neuroradiology 42:471–491
Barkovich A (2000) Congenital Anomalies of the Spine. In: Barkovich A (ed) Pediatric Neuroimaging, 3rd edn. Lippincott-Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 621–683
Finnell RH, Gould A, Spiegelstein O (2003) Pathobiology and genetics of neural tube defects. Epilepsia 44(Suppl 3):14–23
Frey L, Hauser WA (2003) Epidemiology of neural tube defects. Epilepsia 44(Suppl 3):4–13
Cameron M, Moran P (2009) Prenatal screening and diagnosis of neural tube defects. Prenat Diagn 29:402–411
Coniglio SJ, Anderson SM, Ferguson JE 2nd (1996) Functional motor outcome in children with myelomeningocele: correlation with anatomic level on prenatal ultrasound. Dev Med Child Neurol 38:675–680
Mangels KJ, Tulipan N, Tsao LY et al (2000) Fetal MRI in the evaluation of intrauterine myelomeningocele. Pediatr Neurosurg 32:124–131
Aaronson OS, Hernanz-Schulman M, Bruner JP et al (2003) Myelomeningocele: prenatal evaluation–comparison between transabdominal US and MR imaging. Radiology 227:839–843
Simon EM, Pollock A (2004) Prenatal and postnatal imaging of spinal dysraphism. Semin Roentgenol 39:182–195
Ruanon R, Molho M, Roume J et al (2004) Prenatal diagnosis of fetal skeletal dysplasias by combining two-dimensional and three-dimensional ultrasound and intrauterine three-dimensional helical computer tomography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 24:134–140
Cassart M, Massez A, Cos T et al (2007) Contribution of three-dimensional computed tomography in the assessment of fetal skeletal Dysplasia. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 29:537–543
Brunelle F, Sonigo P, Boddaert N et al (2008) MRI and fetal multidetector CT in the diagnosis of fetal malformations. Bull Acad Natl Med 192:1559–1573
Blaas H, Eik-Nes SH (2009) Sonoembryology and early prenatal diagnosis of neural anomalies. Prenat Diagn 29:312–325
Van den Hof MC, Nicolaides KH, Campbell J et al (1990) Evaluation of the lemon and banana signs in one hundred thirty fetuses with open spina bifida. Am J Obstet Gynecol 162:322–327
D’Addario V, Rossi AC, Pinto V et al (2008) Comparison of six sonographic signs in the prenatal diagnosis of spina bifida. J Perinal Med 36:330–334
Benacerraf B, Shipp T, Bromley B (2006) Three dimensional US of the fetus; volume imaging. Radiology 238:988–996
Tutschek B, Pilu G (2009) Virtual reality ultrasound imaging of the normal and abnormal fetal central nervous system. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 34:259–267
Budorick NE, Pretorius DH, Grafe MR et al (1991) Ossification of the fetal spine. Radiology 181:561–565
Sepulveda W, Corral E, Ayala C et al (2004) Chromosomal abnormalities in fetuses with open neural tube defects: prenatal identification with ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 23:352–356
Thompson D (2009) Postnatal management and outcome for neural tube defects including spina bifida and encephaloceles. Prenat Diagn 29:412–419
McLone DG, Knepper PA (1989) The cause of Chiari II malformation: a unified theory. Pediatr Neurosci 15:1–12
Husler M, Danzer E, Johnson MP et al (2009) Prenatal diagnosis and postnatal outcome of fetal spinal defects without Arnold-Chiari II malformation. Prenat Diagn 29:1050–1057
Maiuri F, Corriero G, Giampaglia F et al (1986) Lateral thoracic meningocele. Surg Neurol 26:409–412
Steinbok P, Cochrane DD (1995) Cervical meningoceles and myelocystoceles: a unifying hypothesis. Pediatr Neurosurg 23:317–322
Pierre-Kahn A, Zerah M, Renier D et al (1997) Congenital lumbosacral lipomas. Childs Nerv Syst 13:298–334
Allen LM, Silverman RK (2000) Prenatal ultrasound evaluation of fetal diastematomyelia: two cases of type I split cord malformation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 15:78–82
Hoffman CH, Dietrich RB, Pais MJ (1993) The split notochord syndrome with dorsal enteric fistula. AJNR 14:622–627
Proctor MR, Bauer SB, Scott RM (2000) The effect of surgery for split spinal cord malformation on neurologic and urologic function. Pediatr Neurosurg 32:13–19
Midrio P, Silberstein HJ, Bilaniuk LT et al (2002) Prenatal diagnosis of terminal myelocystocele in the fetal surgery era: case report. Neurosurgery 50:1152–1154
Choi S, McComb JG (2000) Long-term outcome of terminal myelocystocele patients. Pediatr Neurosurg 32:86–91
Nievelstein RA, Valk J, Smit LM et al (1994) MR of the caudal regression syndrome: embryologic implications. AJNR 15:1021–1029
Hirose S, Farmer DL (2009) Fetal surgery for myelomeningocele. Clin Perinatol 36:431–438
Meuli M, Meuli-Simmen C, Hutchins GM et al (1997) The spinal cord lesion in human fetuses with myelomeningocele: implications for fetal surgery. J Pediatr Surg 22:448–452
Paek BW, Farmer DL, Wilkinson CC et al (2000) Hindbrain herniation develops in surgically created myelomeningocele but is absent after repair in fetal lambs. Am J Obstet Gynecol 183:1119–1123
Rintoul NE, Sutton LN, Hubbard AM et al (2002) A new look at myelomeningoceles: functional level, vertebral level, shunting, and the implications for fetal intervention. Pediatrics 109:409–413
Johnson MP, Sutton LN, Rintoul N et al (2003) Fetal myelomeningocele repair: short-term clinical outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 189:482–487
Bruner JP, Tulipan N, Paschall RL (1999) Fetal surgery for myelomeningocele and the incidence of shunt-dependent hydrocephalus. JAMA 282:1819–1825
Sutton LN, Adzick NS, Bilaniuk LT et al (1999) Improvement in hindbrain herniation demonstrated by serial fetal magnetic resonance imaging following fetal surgery for myelomeningocele. JAMA 282:1826–1831
Tulipan N, Sutton LN, Bruner JP et al (2003) The effect of intrauterine myelomeningocele repair on the incidence of shunt-dependent hydrocephalus. Pediatr Neurosurg 38:27–33
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bulas, D. Fetal evaluation of spine dysraphism. Pediatr Radiol 40, 1029–1037 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-010-1583-0
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-010-1583-0