Skip to main content
Log in

Water imaging (hydrography) in the fetus: the value of a heavily T2-weighted sequence

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Since the development of fast imaging sequences, MR has proved to be a helpful tool in the evaluation of fetal pathology. Because of the high water content of fetal tissues and pathology, hydrography imaging (MR fetography) can provide additional diagnostic information.

Objective

To demonstrate the benefit of MR fetography in fetal imaging.

Materials and methods

From 2004 to 2005, 126 fetal MR examinations were performed for evaluation of an abnormality depicted on an antenatal sonogram. Single-shot fast spin-echo MR imaging and MR fetography were performed through the area of fetal pathology. The two studies were retrospectively compared.

Results

The primary diagnosis was not changed with the addition of MR fetography. New findings, particularly in the kidneys and spine, were identified in 9% of the patients. When fetal pathology was of high water content (80% patients), the MR fetography imaging increased diagnostic confidence. In 11% of the patients, those with cardiovascular or low water pathology, the MR fetography was not beneficial.

Conclusion

The mainstay of fetal imaging is currently the HASTE and SSFSE sequences. However, MR fetography is an excellent adjunct that highlights fetal pathology by reinforcing the diagnosis, identifying additional findings, and providing high-contrast high-resolution images that are helpful when counseling clinicians and patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Coakley F, Glenn OA, Qayyum A et al (2004) Fetal MRI: a developing technique for the developing patient. AJR 182:243–252

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Glastonbury CM, Kennedy AM (2002) Ultrafast MRI of the fetus. Australas Radiol 46:22–32

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Frates CM, Dumar AJ, Benson CB et al (2004) Fetal anomalies: comparison of MR imaging and US for diagnosis. Radiology 232:398–404

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Quinn TM, Hubbard AM, Adzick NS (1998) Prenatal magnetic resonance imaging enhances fetal diagnosis. J Pediatr Surg 33:553–558

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Levine D (2001) Ultrasound versus magnetic resonance imaging in fetal evaluation. Top Magn Reson Imaging 12:25–38

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Levine D (2006) Obstetric MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 24:1–15

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Jara H, Barish MA, Yucel EK et al (1998) MR hydrography: theory and practice of static fluid imaging. AJR 170:873–882

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Regan F, Calvaluzzi J, Nguyen B (1998) Fast MR abdominal imaging using the HASTE sequence. AJR 170:1471–1476

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ellis KJ (1993) Human body composition: in vivo methods, models and assessment. Plenum Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  10. Chen Q, Levine D (2001) Fast fetal magnetic resonance imaging techniques. Top Magn Reson Imaging 12:67–79

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Barish MA, Soto JA (1997) MR cholangiopancreatography: techniques and clinical applications. AJR 169:1295–1303

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Westbrook C, Kaut C (1994) MRI in practice. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, UK

    Google Scholar 

  13. Roy C, Saussine C, Jacqmin D (2000) Magnetic resonance urography. BJU Int 86 [Suppl 1]:42–47

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Fulcher AS, Turner MA, Capps GW (1999) MR cholangiography: technical advances and clinical applications. Radiographics 19:25–41

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Avni FE, Nicaise N, Hall M et al (2001) The role of MR imaging for the assessment of complicated duplex kidneys in children: preliminary report. Pediatr Radiol 31:215–223

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Blandino A, Gaeta M, Minutoli F et al (2002) MR urography of the ureter. AJR 179:1307–1314

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Nagayam M, Watanabe Y, Okumura A et al (2002) High-resolution single-slice MR myelography. AJR 179:515–521

    Google Scholar 

  18. Chaumoitre K, Wikberg E, Shojai R et al (2006) Fetal magnetic resonance hydrography: evaluation of single-shot thick-slab RARE (rapid acquisition with relaxation enhancement) sequence in fetal thoracoabdominal pathology. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 27:537–544

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Beth M. Kline-Fath.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kline-Fath, B.M., Calvo-Garcia, M.A., O’Hara, S.M. et al. Water imaging (hydrography) in the fetus: the value of a heavily T2-weighted sequence. Pediatr Radiol 37, 133–140 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-006-0353-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-006-0353-5

Keywords

Navigation