Assessment of radiation dose awareness among pediatricians
There is increasing awareness among pediatric radiologists of the potential risks associated with ionizing radiation in medical imaging. However, it is not known whether there has been a corresponding increase in awareness among pediatricians.
To establish the level of awareness among pediatricians of the recent publicity on radiation risks in children, knowledge of the relative doses of radiological investigations, current practice regarding parent/patient discussions, and the sources of educational input.
Materials and methods
Of 220 respondents, 105 (48%) were aware of the 2001 American Journal of Roentgenology articles on pediatric CT and radiation, though only 6% were correct in their estimate of the quoted lifetime excess cancer risk associated with radiation doses equivalent to pediatric CT. A sustained or transient increase in parent questioning regarding radiation doses had been noticed by 31%. When estimating the effective doses of various pediatric radiological investigations in chest radiograph (CXR) equivalents, 87% of all responses (and 94% of CT estimates) were underestimates. Only 15% of respondents were familiar with the ALARA principle. Only 14% of pediatricians recalled any relevant formal teaching during their specialty training. The survey response rate was 40%.
Awareness of radiation protection issues among pediatricians is generally low, with widespread underestimation of relative doses and risks.
KeywordsPediatrician survey Radiation dose awareness ALARA principle
- 9.ICRP (1991) 1990 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication no. 60. Pergamon, OxfordGoogle Scholar
- 14.Sternberg S (2001) CT scans in children linked to cancer later. USA Today, January 22Google Scholar
- 23.Thomas KE, Haidar S, Parnell-Parmley JE, et al (2006) Calculation of effective doses for pediatric radiological investigations. Manuscript under preparationGoogle Scholar
- 24.National Radiological Protection Board (1990) Patient dose reduction in diagnostic radiology. Documents of the NRPB, vol. 1, no. 3Google Scholar
- 25.Huda W, Slone R (2003) Review of radiologic physics (2nd edn). Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
- 29.RSNA News (2003) Government may label radiation as carcinogen. RSNA news, March 2003Google Scholar
- 30.Report on Carcinogens, Eleventh Edition; U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, National Toxicology Program. http://ntp-server.niehs.nih.gov/ntp/roc/toc11.html
- 32.Society of Pediatric Radiology (2002) The ALARA concept in pediatric CT intelligent dose reduction. Multidisciplinary conference, 18–19 August 2001. Panel discussion. Pediatr Radiol 32:242–244Google Scholar
- 34.FDA (2001) Public Health Notification. Reducing radiation risk from computed tomography for pediatric and small adult patientsGoogle Scholar
- 35.Slovis TL (ed) (2002) The ALARA concept in pediatric CT intelligent dose reduction. Multidisciplinary conference, 18–19 August 2001. Pediatr Radiol 32:217–313Google Scholar
- 39.Shrimpton PC, Hillier MC, Lewis MA, et al (2005) Doses from computed tomography examinations in the UK–2003 review. NRPB-W67, NRPB Publications. http://www.hpa.org.uk/radiation/publications/index.htm
- 41.FDA (2005) What are the radiation risks from CT? http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/ct/risks.html