Skip to main content
Log in

Limited Relationship Between Echocardiographic Measures and Electrocardiographic Markers of Left Ventricular Size in Healthy Children

  • Research
  • Published:
Pediatric Cardiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Pediatric ECG standards have been defined without echocardiographic confirmation of normal anatomy. The Pediatric Heart Network Normal Echocardiogram Z-score Project provides a racially diverse group of healthy children with normal echocardiograms. We hypothesized that ECG and echocardiographic measures of left ventricular (LV) dimensions are sufficiently correlated in healthy children to imply a clinically meaningful relationship. This was a secondary analysis of a previously described cohort including 2170 digital ECGs. The relationship between 6 ECG measures associated with LV size were analyzed with LV Mass (LVMass-z) and left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV-z) along with 11 additional parameters. Pearson or Spearman correlations were calculated for the 78 ECG-echocardiographic pairs with regression analyses assessing the variance in ECG measures explained by variation in LV dimensions and demographic variables. ECG/echocardiographic measurement correlations were significant and concordant in 41/78 (53%), though many were significant and discordant (13/78). Of the 6 ECG parameters, 5 correlated in the clinically predicted direction for LV Mass-z and LVEDV-z. Even when statistically significant, correlations were weak (0.05–0.24). R2 was higher for demographic variables than for echocardiographic measures or body surface area in all pairs, but remained weak (R2 ≤ 0.17). In a large cohort of healthy children, there was a positive association between echocardiographic measures of LV size and ECG measures of LVH. These correlations were weak and dependent on factors other than echocardiographic or patient derived variables. Thus, our data support deemphasizing the use of solitary, traditional measurement-based ECG markers traditionally thought to be characteristic of LVH as standalone indications for further cardiac evaluation of LVH in children and adolescents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Davignon A, Rautaharju P, Boisselle E, Soumis F (1979) Normal ECG standards for infants and children. Pediatr Cardiol 1:123–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Rijnbeek PR, Witsenburg M, Hess J, Kors JA (2000) Continuous age-dependent normal limits for the pediatric electrocardiogram. J Electrocardiol 33(Suppl):199–201

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Rijnbeek PR, Witsenburg M, Schrama E, Hess J, Kors JA (2001) New normal limits for the paediatric electrocardiogram. Eur Heart J 22:702–711

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Rivenes SM et al (2003) Usefulness of the pediatric electrocardiogram in detecting left ventricular hypertrophy: results from the prospective pediatric pulmonary and cardiovascular complications of vertically transmitted HIV infection (P2C2 HIV) multicenter study. Am Heart J 145:716–723

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Lopez L et al (2017) Relationship of echocardiographic z scores adjusted for body surface area to age, sex, race, and ethnicity: the Pediatric Heart Network Normal Echocardiogram Database. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 10:979

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Saarel EV et al (2018) Electrocardiograms in Healthy North American Children in the Digital Age. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 11:e005808

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Bratincsak A, Williams M, Kimata C, Perry JC (2015) The electrocardiogram is a poor diagnostic tool to detect left ventricular hypertrophy in children: a comparison with echocardiographic assessment of left ventricular mass. Congenit Heart Dis 10:E164–E171

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Czosek RJ et al (2014) Relationship between echocardiographic LV mass and ECG based left ventricular voltages in an adolescent population: related or random? Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 37:1133–1140

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hedman K et al (2020) Limitations of electrocardiography for detecting left ventricular hypertrophy or concentric remodeling in athletes. Am J Med 133:123–132

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Tague L et al (2018) Comparison of left ventricular hypertrophy by electrocardiography and echocardiography in children using analytics tool. Pediatr Cardiol 39:1378–1388

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Rijnbeek PR, Kors JA, Witsenburg M (2001) Minimum bandwidth requirements for recording of pediatric electrocardiograms. Circulation 104:3087–3090

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bailey JJ et al (1990) Recommendations for standardization and specifications in automated electrocardiography: bandwidth and digital signal processing. A report for health professionals by an ad hoc writing group of the Committee on Electrocardiography and Cardiac Electrophysiology of the Council on Clinical Cardiology, American Heart Association. Circulation 81:730–739

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Bratincsak A et al (2020) Electrocardiogram standards for children and young adults using Z-Scores. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 13:e008253

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Holland RP, Arnsdorf MF (1977) Solid angle theory and the electrocardiogram: physiologic and quantitative interpretations. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 19:431–457

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Farrell RM, Syed A, Syed A, Gutterman DD (2008) Effects of limb electrode placement on the 12- and 16-lead electrocardiogram. J Electrocardiol 41:536–545

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kania M et al (2014) The effect of precordial lead displacement on ECG morphology. Med Biol Eng Comput 52:109–119

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Engblom H et al (2005) The relationship between electrical axis by 12-lead electrocardiogram and anatomical axis of the heart by cardiac magnetic resonance in healthy subjects. Am Heart J 150:507–512

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Hoekema R, Uijen GJ, van Erning L, van Oosterom A (1999) Interindividual variability of multilead electrocardiographic recordings: influence of heart position. J Electrocardiol 32:137–148

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Hancock EW et al (2009) AHA/ACCF/HRS recommendations for the standardization and interpretation of the electrocardiogram: part V: electrocardiogram changes associated with cardiac chamber hypertrophy: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology; the American College of Cardiology Foundation; and the Heart Rhythm Society. Endorsed by the International Society for Computerized Electrocardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol 53:992–1002

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Pollard JD et al (2021) Electrocardiogram machine learning for detection of cardiovascular disease in African Americans: the Jackson Heart Study. Eur Heart J Digit Health 2:137–151

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Biering-Sorensen T et al (2018) Global ECG measures and cardiac structure and function: The ARIC Study (Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities). Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 11:e005961

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The study was supported by grants (HL135680, HL135685, HL135683, HL135689, HL135646, HL135665, HL135678, HL135682, HL135666, HL135691, HL068270) from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, NIH. The contents of this work are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official views of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, no other disclosures.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Contributions

MEA prepared the main manuscript and tables with RG and FLT performing statistical analysis and preparing the figures. The overall study design was developed by LM, JK, EVS, MEA, RC and JT and approved by all members of the writing committee prior to analysis. MTF, TP and EVS managed the ECG core lab and LM managed the echocardiographic core lab. Additional editorial review was provided by the remaining members of the writing committee as well as written formal acceptance of the manuscript. In addition the PHN committee for publications reviewed and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark E. Alexander.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alexander, M.E., Gongwer, R., Trachtenberg, F.L. et al. Limited Relationship Between Echocardiographic Measures and Electrocardiographic Markers of Left Ventricular Size in Healthy Children. Pediatr Cardiol (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-024-03448-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-024-03448-2

Keywords

Navigation