Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Neonatal Outcomes of Critical Congenital Heart Defects: A Multicenter Epidemiological Study of Turkish Neonatal Society

Neonatal Outcomes of CCHD

  • Research
  • Published:
Pediatric Cardiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Critical congenital heart disease (CCHD) is one of the leading causes of neonatal and infant mortality. We aimed to elucidate the epidemiology, spectrum, and outcome of neonatal CCHD in Türkiye. This was a multicenter epidemiological study of neonates with CCHD conducted from October 2021 to November 2022 at national tertiary health centers. Data from 488 neonatal CCHD patients from nine centers were entered into the Trials-Network online registry system during the study period. Transposition of great arteria was the most common neonatal CHD, accounting for 19.5% of all cases. Sixty-three (12.9%) patients had extra-cardiac congenital anomalies. A total of 325 patients underwent cardiac surgery. Aortic arch repair (29.5%), arterial switch (25.5%), and modified Blalock–Taussig shunt (13.2%). Overall, in-hospital mortality was 20.1% with postoperative mortality of 19.6%. Multivariate analysis showed that the need of prostaglandin E1 before intervention, higher VIS (> 17.5), the presence of major postoperative complications, and the need for early postoperative extracorporeal membrane oxygenation were the main risk factors for mortality. The mortality rate of CCHD in our country remains high, although it varies by health center. Further research needs to be conducted to determine long-term outcomes for this vulnerable population.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author (DD).

References

  1. Frank LH, Bradshaw E, Beekman R, Mahle WT, Martin GR (2013) Critical congenital heart disease screening using pulse oximetry. J Pediatr 162(3):445–453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2012.11.020;162:445-453

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Olney RS, Ailes EC, Sontag MK (2015) Detection of critical congenital heart defects: review of contributions from prenatal and newborn screening. Semin Perinatol 39:230–237. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.semperi.2015.03.007

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Tchervenkov CI, Jacobs JP, Bernier PL, Stellin G (2008) The improvement of care for paediatric and congenital cardiac disease across the World: a challenge for the World Society for Pediatric and Congenital Heart Surgery. Cardiol Young 18:63–69

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Khairy P, Ionescu-Ittu R, Mackie AS, Abrahamowicz M, Pilote L, Marelli AJ (2010) Changing mortality in congenital heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 56:1149–1157

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Brown MD, Wernovsky G, Mussato KA et al (2005) Long-term and developmental outcomes of children with complex congenital heart disease. Clin Perinatol 32:1043–1057

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Aydin E, Aypar E, Oktem A, Ozyuncu O, Yurdakok M, Guvener M, Demircin M, Beksac MS (2020) Congenital heart defects: the 10-year experience at a single center. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 33(3):368–372

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Onan IS, Erek E, Haydin S, Onan B, Kocyigit OI, Topuz U, Odemis E, Yeniterzi M, Bakir I (2013) Clinical outcome of patients in a start-up congenital heart surgery program in Turkey. Artif Organs 37(1):E18–E23. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1594.2012.01580.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hatipoğlu S, Salihoğlu Ö, Can E, Akyol MB (2012) Clinical analysis of neonates with congenital heart disease in the neonatal intensive care unit: a 5-year experience. Anadolu Kardiyol Derg 12(7):612–613

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Jacobs JP, He X, Mayer JE Jr, Austin EH III, Quintessenza JA, Karl TR, Vricella L, Mavroudis C, O’Brien SM, Pasquali SK et al (2016) Mortality trends in pediatric and congenital heart surgery: an analysis of The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Congenital Heart Surgery Database. Ann Thorac Surg 102:1345–1352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.01.071

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Abqari S, Gupta A, Shahab T et al (2016) Profile and risk factors for congenital heart defects: a study in a tertiary care hospital. Ann Pediatr Cardiol 9:216–221

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Kaplan S, Pinar G, Kaplan B, Aslantekin F, Karabulut E, Ayar B, Dilmen U (2016) The prevalence of consanguineous marriages and affecting factors in Turkey: a national survey. J Biosoc Sci 48(5):616–630. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002193201600005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Yunis K, Mumtaz G, Bitar F et al (2006) Consanguineous marriage and congenital heart defects: a case control study in the neonatal period. Am J Med Genet A 140:1525–1530

    Google Scholar 

  13. Fatema NN (2017) Pattern of congenital heart diseases and treatment options in a Bangladeshi center: analysis of 6914 cases from non-invasive cardiac laboratory. Cardiovasc J 9:97–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Rashid U, Qureshi AU, Hyder SN et al (2022) Pattern of congenital heart disease in a developing country tertiary care center: factors associated with delayed diagnosis. Ann Pediatr Cardiol 9:210–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wren C, Reinhardt Z, Khawaja K (2008) Twenty-year trends in diagnosis of life-threatening neonatal cardiovascular malformations. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 93:F33–F35

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. de Wahl GA, Wennergren M, Sandberg K et al (2009) Impact of pulse oximetry screening on the detection of duct dependent congenital heart disease: a Swedish prospective screening study in 39, 821 newborns. BMJ 338:3037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Martin GR, Ewer AK, Gaviglio A, Hom LA, Saarinen A, Sontag M, Burns KM, Kemper AR, Oster ME (2020) Updated strategies for pulse oximetry screening for critical congenital heart disease. Pediatrics 146(1):e20191650. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2019-1650

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Dilli D, Doğan V, Özyurt BM, Özyurt A, Hakan N, Bozabalı S, Caner İ, Olgun H, Koç M, Taşoğlu İ, Karademir S, Zenciroğlu A (2019) Should we start a nationwide screening program for critical congenital heart disease in Turkey? A pilot study on four centres with different altitudes. Cardiol Young 29(4):475–480

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Liberman RF, Getz KD, Lin AE et al (2014) Delayed diagnosis of critical congenital heart defects: trends and associated factors. Pediatrics 134:e373–e381

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Zhang W, Xu HY, Zhang YC, Liu KB (2021) Delayed diagnosis of critical congenital heart defects predicting risk factors and survival rate in newborns in Beijing: a retrospective study. J Int Med Res 49(7):3000605211028028

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Thangaratinam S, Brown K, Zamora J, Khan KS, Ewer AK (2012) Pulse oximetry screening for critical congenital heart defects in asymptomatic newborn babies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet 379:2459–2464. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60107-X

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Reller MD, Strickland MJ, Riehle-Colarusso T, Mahle WT, Correa A (2008) Prevalence of congenital heart defects in metropolitan Atlanta, 1998–2005. J Pediatr 153(6):807–813

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Singh R, Rajaram TN (2022) The spectrum of congenital heart disease in children in the Andaman and Nicobar Islands: a five-year retrospective study. Cureus 14(9):e29109. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.29109

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Rosa RCM, Rosa RFM, Zen PRG, Paskulin GA (2013) Congenital heart defects and extracardiac malformations. Revista Paulista de Pediatria 31:243–251

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Millen SM, Olsen CH, Flanagan RP, Scott JS, Dobson CP (2023) The effect of geographic origin and destination on congenital heart disease outcomes: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 23(1):99

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Rocha LA, Froio SC, Silva CC et al (2018) Risk factors for mortality in children with congenital heart disease delivered at a Brazilian tertiary center. Braz J Cardiovasc Surg 33:603–607

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Cheng HH, Almodovar MC, Laussen PC, Wypij D, Polito A, Brown DW, Emani SM, Pigula FA, Allan CK, Costello JM (2011) Outcomes and risk factors for mortality in premature neonates with critical congenital heart disease. Pediatr Cardiol 32(8):1139–1146

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Rossi AF, Seiden HS, Sadeghi AM, Nguyen KH, Quintana CS, Gross RP, Griepp RB (1998) The outcome of cardiac operations in infants weighing two kilograms or less. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 116(1):28–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5223(98)70239-9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Oppido G, Pace Napoleone C, Formigari R, Gabbieri D, Pacini D, Frascaroli G et al (2004) Outcome of cardiac surgery in low birth weight and premature infants. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 26(1):44–53

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Pawade A, Waterson K, Laussen P, Karl TR, Mee RB (1993) Cardiopulmonary bypass in neonates weighing less than 2.5 kg: analysis of the risk factors for early and late mortality. J Card Surg 8(1):1–8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Pasquali SK, Dimick JB, Ohye RG (2015) Time for a more unified approach to pediatric health care policy? The case of congenital heart care. JAMA 314:1689–1690. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2015.10166

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Welke KF, O’Brien SM, Peterson ED, Ungerleider RM, Jacobs ML, Jacobs JP (2009) The complex relationship between pediatric cardiac surgical case volumes and mortality rates in a national clinical database. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 137(5):1133–1140

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Checchia PA, McCollegan J, Daher N, Kolovos N, Levy F, Markovitz B (2005) The effect of surgical case volume on outcome after the Norwood procedure. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 129(4):754–759

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Pasquali SK, Li JS, Burstein DS, Sheng S, O’Brien SM, Jacobs ML, Jaquiss RD, Peterson ED, Gaynor JW, Jacobs JP (2012) Association of center volume with mortality and complications in pediatric heart surgery. Pediatrics 129(2):e370–e376. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2011-1188

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Elassal AA, Al-Radi OO, Debis RS, Zaher ZF, Abdelmohsen GA, Faden MS, Noaman NA, Elakaby AR, Abdelmotaleb ME, Abdulgawad AM, Elhudairy MS, Jabbad AH, Ismail AA, Aljohani NB, Alghamdi AM, Dohain AM (2022) Neonatal congenital heart surgery: contemporary outcomes and risk profile. J Cardiothorac Surg 17(1):80. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13019-022-01830-w

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Wu W, He J, Shao X (2020) Incidence and mortality trend of congenital heart disease at the global, regional, and national level, 1990–2017. Medicine (Baltimore) 99(23):e20593

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Bateson BP, Deng L, Ange B et al (2023) Hospital mortality and adverse events following repair of congenital heart defects in developing countries. World J Pediatr Congenit Heart Surg 14(6):701–707. https://doi.org/10.1177/21501351231176189

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Derridj N, Ghanchi A, Bonnet D et al (2023) Early mortality in infants born with neonatally operated congenital heart defects and low or very-low birthweight: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Cardiovasc Dev Dis 10(2):47

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was supported by the Turkish Neonatal Society (TNS), which funded the online registration system used by the study (https://www.trials-network.org/). The TNS had no role in the study design, data analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the article. The corresponding author had full access to all the data in the study and took final responsibility for the decision to submit the manuscript for publication. The final version of the manuscript was approved by all authors. No honorarium, grant, or other form of funding was provided to any author in connection with the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Contribution to study concept: DD, HA, UAÖ, and MT, Design: DD, HA, UAÖ, and AZ, Acquisition of data: All authors, Analysis: DD and HA, Interpretation of data: DD, Revising the manuscript: All authors.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dilek Dilli.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no competing interests to disclose.

Ethical Approval

This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the TNS Multicenter Research Scientific Steering Committee (E-21/04-162, date: April 7, 2021). Verbal and written informed consent were obtained from the parents of the newborns.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dilli, D., Akduman, H., Zenciroğlu, A. et al. Neonatal Outcomes of Critical Congenital Heart Defects: A Multicenter Epidemiological Study of Turkish Neonatal Society. Pediatr Cardiol 45, 257–271 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-023-03362-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-023-03362-z

Keywords

Navigation