Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Evaluation of an Outpatient and Telehealth Initiative to Reduce Tube Dependency in Infants with Complex Congenital Heart Disease

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Cardiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Infants with congenital heart disease (CHD) often require supplemental nutrition via tube feeding, even after corrective surgical repair. The need for tube feeding can persist months after discharge home, and outpatient weaning from the tube can be a slow and difficult process. Lack of consensus exists in the literature as to the best approach to this challenge. We describe a single institution’s initiative to decrease tube dependency after discharge through an intensive, telehealth-centric program for children with CHD. Of 16 children aged 1–26 months, 94% were able to be successfully tube weaned at home, with median time to tube-free of 12 days. No significant weight loss was noted during or after the wean process. Longer tube wean time was associated with older age at onset and comorbid genetic syndrome. Our telehealth-based intensive tube weaning program was successful but required a multidisciplinary team, targeted pre-participation patient evaluation, and frequent communication.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hoffman JI, Kaplan S (2002) The incidence of congenital heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 39(12):1890–1900

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Oster ME et al (2013) Temporal trends in survival among infants with critical congenital heart defects. Pediatrics 131(5):e1502–e1508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Medoff-Cooper B et al (2016) The association among feeding mode, growth, and developmental outcomes in infants with complex congenital heart disease at 6 and 12 months of age. J Pediatr 169:154–9.e1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Alten JA et al (2015) Perioperative feeding management of neonates with CHD: analysis of the pediatric cardiac critical care consortium (PC4) registry. Cardiol Young 25(8):1593–1601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hill GD et al (2014) Effect of feeding modality on interstage growth after stage I palliation: a report from the national pediatric cardiology quality improvement collaborative. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 148(4):1534–1539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hebson CL et al (2012) Association of feeding modality with interstage mortality after single-ventricle palliation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 144(1):173–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sables-Baus S et al (2012) Oral feeding outcomes in neonates with congenital cardiac disease undergoing cardiac surgery. Cardiol Young 22(1):42–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. McKean EB et al (2017) Feeding difficulties in neonates following cardiac surgery: determinants of prolonged feeding-tube use. Cardiol Young 27(6):1203–1211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dunitz-Scheer M et al (2009) Prevention and treatment of tube dependency in infancy and early childhood. ICAN 1(2):73–82

    Google Scholar 

  10. Krom H, de Winter JP, Kindermann A (2017) Development, prevention, and treatment of feeding tube dependency. Eur J Pediatr 176(6):683–688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wilken M, Cremer V, Echtermeyer S (2015) Home-based feeding tube weaning: outline of a new treatment modality for children with long-term feeding tube dependency. ICAN 7(5):270–277

    Google Scholar 

  12. Trabi T et al (2010) Inpatient tube weaning in children with long-term feeding tube dependency: a retrospective analysis. Infant Ment Health J 31(6):664–681

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Dovey TM et al (2018) Definitions and clinical guidance on the enteral dependence component of the avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder diagnostic criteria in children. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 42(3):499–507

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Marinschek S et al (2014) Weaning children off enteral nutrition by netcoaching versus onsite treatment: a comparative study. J Paediatr Child Health 50(11):902–907

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Brown J et al (2014) Successful gastrostomy tube weaning program using an intensive multidisciplinary team approach. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 58(6):743–749

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sharp WG et al (2017) A systematic review and meta-analysis of intensive multidisciplinary intervention for pediatric feeding disorders: how standard is the standard of care? J Pediatr 181:116-124.e4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Dunitz-Scheer M et al (2011) Tube dependence: a reactive eating behavior disorder. ICAN 3(4):209–215

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hartdorff CM et al (2015) Clinical tube weaning supported by hunger provocation in fully-tube-fed children. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 60(4):538–543

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Luria JW et al (2006) Reliability science and patient safety. Pediatr Clin North Am 53(6):1121–1133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Chou JH, Roumiantsev S, Singh R (2020) PediTools electronic growth chart calculators: applications in clinical care, research, and quality improvement. J Med Internet Res 22(1):e16204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Shine AM et al (2019) Transition from tube feeding to oral feeding: experience in a tertiary care paediatric cardiology unit. Ir J Med Sci 188(1):201–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Anderson JB et al (2009) Lower weight-for-age z score adversely affects hospital length of stay after the bidirectional Glenn procedure in 100 infants with a single ventricle. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 138(2):397–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Evans CF et al (2017) Interstage weight Gain Is Associated With Survival After First-Stage Single-Ventricle Palliation. Ann Thorac Surg 104(2):674–680

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Megan Horsley.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

No financial or non-financial disclosures.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Appendix

Medical readiness for cardiac tube wean program:

Medical Readiness

Single-ventricular physiology

  • At least 2-week post-bidirectional Glenn procedure or demonstrated hemodynamic stability in interstage period

  • Adequate weight gain for age with supplemental tube feeds prior to weaning (see nutritional readiness below)

  • Safe swallow: definition varies center to center, our speech therapists recommend a VSS clear of aspiration

  • Echo criteria: no greater than moderate tricuspid regurgitation or mild ventricular dysfunction

  • Medication criteria: twice daily diuretics or less, no recent escalation of medications within last 2 weeks to suggest instability of cardiac status.

Biventricular physiology

  • At least 2-week post-surgical repair

  • Safe swallow: definition varies center to center, our speech therapists recommend clinical evaluation with VSS if concerns

  • Established care with primary outpatient cardiologist × 1 visit

  • Echo criteria: no greater than mild ventricular dysfunction, no severe residual cardiac lesions

  • Medication criteria: twice daily diuretics or less, no recent escalation of medications within last 2 weeks to suggest instability of cardiac status.

SLP: Feeding Readiness Checklist for Tube Feed Weaning

  • Manages secretions

  • Maintains interest and awake/alert state throughout duration of feeds

  • Does not demonstrate aversive feeding behaviors (grimace, gagging, etc.) when offered PO.

  • Demonstrates functional sucking pattern and coordination of suck-swallow-breathe with or without external pacing

  • No evidence of active aspiration on current nipple

  • Tolerates current PO/NG feeding regimen with minimal episodes of emesis

  • Able to maintain stable vital signs ( no coughing, choking, desaturations, color changes) with feeding.

If accepting purees/solids.

  1. o

    Opens mouth to spoon

  2. o

    Uses lips to remove bolus from spoon/fork

  3. o

    Able to lateralize bolus and move posteriorly to swallow

  4. o

    Demonstrates functional chewing with solids

  5. o

    Minimal anterior loss of foods presented

  6. o

    Demonstrates safe swallowing when drinking from cup or straw

  7. o

    Does not demonstrate aversive feeding behaviors (grimace, gagging, etc.) when offered PO

  8. o

    Able to remain seated in high chair or at table for a minimum of 15 min.

Nutritional Readiness

  • Identify if any degree of malnutrition

    1. o

      If patient meets mild or moderate malnutrition, reasonable to still wean if no weight loss in the last month. The degree of wean is subject to provider

    2. o

      If patient meets severe malnutrition, not eligible to wean

  • Ensure appropriate nutritional-focused physical exam (NFPE) to support any evidence of malnutrition

  • Identify nutrition education to be addressed

  • Discussion with primary RD or provider managing the children’s nutrition.

Social Readiness

  • Must have access to email account

  • Must be accountable to respond to emails/phone calls and be able to communicate at least every other day with care team

  • Must be willing to come in periodically for initial assessment and PRN additional assessments during this process

  • Ability to understand and repeat red flags of when to notify care team.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Horsley, M., Hill, G.D., Kaskie, S. et al. Evaluation of an Outpatient and Telehealth Initiative to Reduce Tube Dependency in Infants with Complex Congenital Heart Disease. Pediatr Cardiol 43, 1429–1437 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-022-02864-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-022-02864-6

Keywords

Navigation