Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Coronary Artery Origins Pattern in Pediatric Patients with Right-Left Fusion Bicuspid Aortic Valve

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Cardiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) is a common congenital heart defect associated with coronary artery (CA) variants, including higher incidence of left CA dominance and shorter left main CA length. We observed by transthoracic echocardiography that left and right CA origins appear closer together in pediatric patients with right-left fusion (R/L) BAV compared to patients with trileaflet aortic valves. We sought to objectively confirm this observation. A retrospective review of pediatric echocardiograms with R/L BAV at a single institution (12/2010–11/2018) was performed. The ‘coronary angle’ was defined as the angle between the left and right coronary artery origins in the parasternal short axis view relative to the center of the aortic valve orifice. Values were compared to age-matched controls. Patients with inadequate images, anomalous coronary origins, or predefined significant congenital heart defects were excluded. We compared 191 R/L BAV patients (64% male) to 136 controls (57% male). Coronary angle was significantly more acute in R/L BAV than in controls (117.9° ± 16.7° vs 139.0° ± 10.1°, p < 0.0001). This was independent of age and gender. The difference persisted when BAV patients with abnormal aortic annulus/root diameters were removed from analysis (119.5° ± 15.1° vs 139.0° ± 10.1°, p < 0.0001). CA origins are closer together in R/L BAV independent of age, gender, or annulus/root size. This new anatomical description may aid in the diagnosis of subtle (‘forme fruste’) R/L BAV, assist in interventional planning, and improve understanding of the relationship between BAV and CA development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Measurements and statistical analysis results are available from the authors if needed.

Code Availability

Not applicable

Abbreviations

AI:

Aortic insufficiency

ANOVA:

Analysis of variance

AS:

Aortic stenosis

ASD:

Atrial septal defect

BAV:

Bicuspid aortic valve

BSA:

Body surface area

CA:

Coronary artery/arteries

CoA:

Coarctation of the aorta

HSD:

Honestly significant difference

ICC:

Intraclass correlation coefficient

LCA:

Left coronary artery

LCC:

Left coronary cusp

LMCA:

Left main coronary artery

MS:

Mitral stenosis

NCC:

Noncoronary cusp

PFO:

Patent foramen ovale

PLAX:

Parasternal long axis

PSAX:

Parasternal short axis

R/L BAV:

Right-left fusion bicuspid aortic valve

RCA:

Right coronary artery

RCC:

Right coronary cusp

SD:

Standard deviation

SupraAS:

Supravalvar aortic stenosis

TAV:

Trileaflet aortic valve

TTE:

Transthoracic echocardiography

VSD:

Ventricular septal defect

References

  1. Hoffman JIE, Kaplan S (2002) The incidence of congenital heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 39:1890–1900. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0735-1097(02)01886-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Giusti B, Sticchi E, De Cario R et al (2017) Genetic bases of bicuspid aortic valve: the contribution of traditional and high-throughput sequencing approaches on research and diagnosis. Front Physiol 8:612. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2017.00612

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Siu SC, Silversides CK (2010) Bicuspid aortic valve disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 55:2789–2800. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2009.12.068

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Borger MA, Fedak PWM, Stephens EH et al (2018) The American Association for Thoracic Surgery consensus guidelines on bicuspid aortic valve–related aortopathy: full online-only version. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 156:e41–e74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2018.02.115

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Warnes CA, Williams RG, Bashore TM et al (2008) ACC/AHA 2008 guidelines for the management of adults with congenital heart disease. Circulation 118:e714-833. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.190690

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sperling JS, Lubat E (2015) Forme fruste or ‘incomplete’ bicuspid aortic valves with very small raphes: the prevalence of bicuspid valve and its significance may be underestimated. Int J Cardiol 184:1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2015.02.013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sievers H-H, Schmidtke C (2007) A classification system for the bicuspid aortic valve from 304 surgical specimens. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 133:1226–1233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2007.01.039

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Koenraadt WMC, Tokmaji G, DeRuiter MC et al (2016) Coronary anatomy as related to bicuspid aortic valve morphology. Heart 102:943–949. https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2015-308629

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Higgins CB, Wexler L (1975) Reversal of dominance of the coronary arterial system in isolated aortic stenosis and bicuspid aortic valve. Circulation 52:292–296. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.52.2.292

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hutchins GM, Nazarian IH, Bulkley BH (1978) Association of left dominant coronary arterial system with congenital bicuspid aortic valve. Am J Cardiol 42:57–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9149(78)90985-2

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Johnson AD, Detwiler JH, Higgins CB (1978) Left coronary artery anatomy in patients with bicuspid aortic valves. Heart 40:489–493. https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.40.5.489

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Lerer PK, Edwards WD (1981) Coronary arterial anatomy in bicuspid aortic valve. Necropsy study of 100 hearts. Heart 45:142–147. https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.45.2.142

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Michałowska IM, Hryniewiecki T, Kwiatek P et al (2016) Coronary artery variants and anomalies in patients with bicuspid aortic valve. J Thorac Imaging 31:156–162. https://doi.org/10.1097/RTI.0000000000000205

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Naito S, Petersen J, Reichenspurner H, Girdauskas E (2018) The impact of coronary anomalies on the outcome in aortic valve surgery: comparison of bicuspid aortic valve versus tricuspid aortic valve morphotype. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 26:617–622. https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivx396

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Koenraadt WMC, Bartelings MM, Bökenkamp R et al (2018) Coronary anatomy in children with bicuspid aortic valves and associated congenital heart disease. Heart 104:385–393. https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2017-311178

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Stefek HA, Lin KH, Rigsby CK et al (2020) Eccentric enlargement of the aortic sinuses in pediatric and adult patients with bicuspid aortic valves: a cardiac MRI study. Pediatr Cardiol 41:350–360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-019-02264-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lopez L, Colan SD, Frommelt PC et al (2010) Recommendations for quantification methods during the performance of a pediatric echocardiogram: a report from the Pediatric Measurements Writing Group of the American Society of Echocardiography Pediatric and Congenital Heart Disease Council. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 23:465–495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.echo.2010.03.019

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Haycock GB, Schwartz GJ, Wisotsky DH (1978) Geometric method for measuring body surface area: a height-weight formula validated in infants, children, and adults. J Pediatr 93:62–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3476(78)80601-5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lopez L, Colan S, Stylianou M et al (2017) Relationship of echocardiographic Z scores adjusted for body surface area to age, sex, race, and ethnicity. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 10:e006979. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.117.006979

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Clouse M, Cailes C, Devine J et al (2002) What is the feasibility of imaging coronary arteries during routine echocardiograms in children? J Am Soc Echocardiogr 15:1127–1131. https://doi.org/10.1067/mje.2002.123257

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Guala A, Rodriguez-Palomares J, Galian-Gay L et al (2019) Partial aortic valve leaflet fusion is related to deleterious alteration of proximal aorta hemodynamics. Circulation 139:2707–2709. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.039693

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hautin R, Mirault T, Munte L et al (2020) Aortic dissection in an undiagnosed familial form of bicuspid aortic valve with a short raphe. CASE 4:443–447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.case.2020.07.006

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Joan Reisch, PhD (UT Southwestern Department of Population and Data Sciences) performed statistical analyses for this study.

Funding

No funds, grants, or other support was received from any external source. Statistical analysis was paid for by our echocardiography laboratory’s research fund.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

DNB: Lead author, project design, data collection (including coronary angle measurements), data management, manuscript review. CR: Project design, data collection (including coronary angle measurements), manuscript review. PB: Project design, data collection, manuscript review. PPT: Principal Investigator, project design, data collection (including coronary angle and aortic diameter measurements), manuscript review.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel N. Beauchamp.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Ethical Approval

This retrospective chart review study involving human participants was in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The Institutional Review Boards at UT Southwestern Medical Center and Children’s Health approved this study.

Consent to Participate

Informed consent was not required for this retrospective study that utilized non-identifiable data collected for routine clinical purposes.

Consent for Publication

Consent for publication was not required for this retrospective study that utilized non-identifiable data collected for routine clinical purposes.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Beauchamp, D.N., Ramaciotti, C., Brown, P. et al. Coronary Artery Origins Pattern in Pediatric Patients with Right-Left Fusion Bicuspid Aortic Valve. Pediatr Cardiol 43, 1229–1238 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-022-02843-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-022-02843-x

Keywords

Navigation