Skip to main content
Log in

Tricuspid Valve Size Relationship to Right Ventricular Volume in Post-operative Tetralogy of Fallot Patients

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Cardiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In post-operative Tetralogy of Fallot (TOF) patients cMRI data are used for determining right ventricle (RV) dilation to justify the pulmonary valve placement. Echocardiogram analysis of RV volumes has inherent accuracy issues. There are no data exploring the relationship of transthoracic echocardiography tricuspid valve (TV) annulus size and cMRI RV dilation. Retrospective study in post-operative TOF patients. Patients less than 21 years old and with high-quality transthoracic echocardiogram and MRI within 6 months of each other were included. We collected demographic data, type of initial repair, echocardiographic, and cMRI data. A single reviewer measured echocardiogram TV size. Boston z-scores were used. 77 echocardiogram and cMRI pairs were analyzed. Average age was 14 years old. There is not a strong linear relationship between TV z-score and indexed right ventricular end diastolic volume (RVEDVi) (R2 = 0.31). Twenty patients had RVEDVi’s of greater than 150 ml/m2. From those 20 patients, 9 patients had a TV z-score of > 2. No patient had a TV z-score > 2 and a normal RVEDVi. For a TV z-score < 2, there was a positive predictive value of 100%, a negative predictive value of 83%, specificity of 100%, and sensitivity of 45%. In our study population, the TV z-score is not sufficient to predict RV dilation. However, TV z-score > 2 has a high positive predictive value for an RVEDVi of > 150 ml/m2. This would suggest that a cMRI should be done if the TV z-score is > 2 on echocardiography.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Not applicable.

Code Availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Geva T (2011) Repaired tetralogy of Fallot: the roles of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in evaluating pathophysiology and for pulmonary valve replacement decision support. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. https://doi.org/10.1186/1532-429x-13-9

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Alvarez-Fuente M, Garrido-Lestache E, Fernandez-Pineda L et al (2015) Timing of pulmonary valve replacement: how much can the right ventricle dilate before it looses its remodeling potential? Pediatr Cardiol 37(3):601–605. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-015-1320-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Villafañe J, Feinstein JA, Jenkins KJ et al (2013) Hot topics in tetralogy of Fallot. J Am Coll Cardiol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2013.07.100

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Stout K et al (2018) AHA/ACC guideline for the management of adults with congenital heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on clinical practice guidelines. Circulation 139(14):698–800

    Google Scholar 

  5. Buechel ERV, Dave HH, Kellenberger CJ et al (2005) Remodelling of the right ventricle after early pulmonary valve replacement in children with repaired tetralogy of Fallot: assessment by cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Eur Heart J 26(24):2721–2727. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehi581

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Crean A, Ballard G, Maredia N, Greenwood J, Thomson J (2010) 3D echo systematically underestimates right ventricular volume compared to cardiac magnetic resonance in a population with adult congenital heart disease. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. https://doi.org/10.1186/1532-429x-12-s1-p18

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Selly J-B, Iriart X, Roubertie F et al (2015) Multivariable assessment of the right ventricle by echocardiography in patients with repaired tetralogy of Fallot undergoing pulmonary valve replacement: a comparative study with magnetic resonance imaging. Arch Cardiovasc Dis 108(1):5–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acvd.2014.07.054

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Koestenberger M, Nagel B, Ravekes W et al (2010) Tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion and right ventricular ejection fraction in pediatric and adolescent patients with tetralogy of Fallot, patients with atrial septal defect, and age-matched normal subjects. Clin Res Cardiol 100(1):67–75. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-010-0213-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhao H, Kang Y, Pickle J, Wang J, Han Y (2019) Tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion is dependent on right ventricular volume in addition to function. Echocardiography 36(8):1459–1466. https://doi.org/10.1111/echo.14439

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Zakaria D, Lang S, Bolin E, Gossett J, Rettiganti MR, Collins T (2017) Short axis diastolic ventricular area ratio as a new index in screening patients with repaired tetralogy Of Fallot. J Am Coll Cardiol 69(11):644. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0735-1097(17)34033-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This project was supported in part by the National Institutes of Health through Grant Number UL1-TR-001857.

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katelyn Snyder.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Not applicable.

Consent to Participation

Not applicable.

Consent for Publications

Yes.

Ethical Approval

UPMC IRB approved.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Snyder, K., Drant, S., Carris, E. et al. Tricuspid Valve Size Relationship to Right Ventricular Volume in Post-operative Tetralogy of Fallot Patients. Pediatr Cardiol 43, 887–893 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-021-02800-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-021-02800-0

Keywords

Navigation