Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Multiple Ablation Targets in Children: Multiple Accessory Pathways and Coexistent Arrhythmia

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Cardiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The coexistence of different mechanisms of arrhythmia and multiple accessory pathways (MAPs) leading to multiple ablation targets is rarely seen in children, and data regarding these patients in the literature are limited. Herein, we aimed to evaluate patients who required multiple ablation applications, focusing on different targets during the procedures in children, and evaluating the characteristics of coexistent arrhythmia and MAPs, and the results of these procedures in children. Ablation procedures conducted between March 2009 and December 2018 were evaluated retrospectively, and patients with MAPs and/or coexistent arrhythmia who had undergone ablation procedures were included in the study. Among the 1210 patients who underwent ablation procedures, 52 patients (26 male, 26 female) were ablated for multiple targets. Of the 456 patients with APs, 21 had MAPs (4.6%) and of the 1210 patients who underwent ablation procedures, 31 patients had coexistent arrhythmia (2.5%). The patients had a mean age of 12.24 ± 3.4 (4–18) years and mean body weight of 45.17 ± 14.12 (17–74) kg. A total of 110 APs or foci were identified as quaternary in one patient, while it was triple in four patients. The procedures were unsuccessful in six targets of six patients. Although recurrence was observed in four patients, none were ablated for MAPs. Two complications were encountered, comprising ST segment depression that developed in one patient with Wolf-Parkinson-White syndrome, atrioventricular nodal re-entry tachycardia, and a temporary atrioventricular block during atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia ablation. The overall success rate according to the pathway/foci number was 94.5% (104/110), with a recurrence rate of 4.5% (5/110), and a complication rate of 1.8% (2/110). The patient success, recurrence, and complication rates were 88.4% (46/52), 7.6% (4/52), and 3.8% (2/52), respectively. In conclusion, the incidence of multiple arrhythmogenic foci and MAPs were not as low as expected in children. A structured and stepwise approach is mandatory for the diagnosis of the different mechanisms of tachycardia, even after successful ablation procedures. The success, recurrence, and complication rates were comparable with those of patients who had a solitary arrhythmogenic focus or solitary AP.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy or ethical restrictions.

References

  1. Itturralde P, Guevara-Valdivia M, Rodriguez-Chavez L, Medeiros A, Colin L (2002) Radiofrequency ablation of multiple accessory pathways. Europace 4:273–280. https://doi.org/10.1053/eupc.2002.0236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chen SA, Hsia CP, Chiang CE, Chiou CW, Yang CJ, Cheng CC et al (1993) Reappraisal of radiofrequency ablation of multiple accessory pathways. Am Heart J 125:760–771. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-8703(93)90168-9

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hillock RJ, Kalman JM, Roberts-Thomson KC, Haqqani H, Sparks PB (2007) Multiple focal atrial tachycardias in a healthy adult population: characterization and description of successful radiofrequency ablation. Heart Rhythm 4:435–438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2006.12.034

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Houck CA, Chandler SF, Bogers AJ, Triedman JK, Walsh EP, De Groot NM et al (2019) Arrhythmia mechanisms and outcomes of ablation in pediatric patients with congenital heart disease. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 12(11):e007663. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCEP.119.007663

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Klein GJ, Bashore TM, Sellers TD, Pritchett EL, Smith WM, Gallagher JJ (1979) Ventricular fibrillation in the Wolff–Parkinson–White syndrome. N Engl J Med 301:1080–1085

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Weng KP, Wolff GS, Young ML (2003) Multiple accessory pathways in pediatric patients with Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome. Am J Cardiol 91:1178–1183. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9149(03)00263-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Huang JL, Chen SA, Tai CT, Chiang CE, Lee SH, Chiou CW et al (1996) Long-term results of radiofrequency catheter ablation in patients with multiple accessory pathways. Am J Cardiol 78:1375–1379. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9149(96)00648-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Otomo K, Gonzalez MD, Beckman KJ et al (2001) Reversing the direction of paced ventricular and atrial wave fronts reveals an oblique course in accessory AV pathways and improves localization for catheter ablation. Circulation 104:550–556

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Topilski I, Glick A, Viskin S, Belhassen B (2006) Frequency of spontaneous and inducible atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia in patients with idiopathic outflow tract ventricular arrhythmias. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 29:21–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8159.2006.00293.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Tonkin AM, Dugan FA, Svenson RH, Sealy WC, Wallace AG, Gallagher JJ (1975) Coexistence of functional Kent and Mahaim-type tracts in the pre-exitation syndrome, demonstration by catheter techniques and epicardial mapping. Circulation 52:193–200. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.cir.52.2.193

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Sethi KK, Jaishankar S, Gupta MP (1985) Wide QRS supraventricular tachycardia due to coexisting Mahaim and Kent pathways. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 8:549–557. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8159.1985.tb05858.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Valentino M, Mont L, Aguinaga L, Anguera I, Eizmendi I, Sánchez J et al (1998) Ablation of multiple atrio-ventricular accessory pathways in a patient with syncope, atrial fibrilation and fasciculo-ventricular fibers. Rev Esp Cardiol 51:591–595. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0300-8932(98)74793-1

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Tzeisi S, Deisenhofer I, Meirhofer C, Hesling G (2009) Two types of narrow-QRS tachycardia in a patient with coarctation of the aorta and persistent left superior vena cava. Hell J Cardiol 50:548–551

    Google Scholar 

  14. Rakovec P (2003) Transition of orthodromic tachycardia into atriyoventricular nodal tachycardia during radiofrequency ablation of an accessory pathway. Europace 5:215–220. https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/eup256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Jang JK, Park JS, Kim YH, Choi JI, Lim HE, Pak HN et al (2010) Coexisting sustained tachyarrthymia in patients with atrial fibrilation undergoing catheter ablation. Korean Circ J 40(5):235–238. https://doi.org/10.4070/kcj.2010.40.5.235

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Di Biase L, Bai R, Tritto M, Grimaldi M, Biasco MG (2007) Ablation of atrioventricular nodal “slow pathway” for simultaneous treatment of coexisting atrioventricular and nodal reciprocating tachycardia. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 19(2):143–147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-007-9145-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kazemi B, Arya A, Haghjoo M, Sadr-Ameli MA (2006) Coincident atrioventricular nodal reenterant and idiopathic ventricular tachycardia. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann 14(4):284–288. https://doi.org/10.1177/021849230601400404

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Stec S, Sikorska A, Krynski T, Kulakowski P (2008) Double tachycardia. One heart with two arrhythmias. Difficulties in diagnosis and treatment with radiofrequency ablation-case report. Pol Merkur Lek 24(143):422–425

    Google Scholar 

  19. Bottoni N, Donateo P, Quartieri F, Brignole M, Menozzi C (2005) Two unusual cases of coincident atrioventricular nodal reenterant tachycardia and ventricular tachycardia. Ital Heart J 6:765–770

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Wagshal AB, Mittleman RS, Schuger CD, Huang SK (1994) Coincident idiopathic left ventricular tachycardia and atrioventricular nodal reenterant tachycardia: control by radiofrequency catheter ablation of the slow atrioventricular nodal pathway. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 17:386–396. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8159.1994.tb01402.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kautzner J, Cihak R, Vancura V, Bytesnik J (2003) Coincidence of idiopathic ventricular outflow tract tachycardia and atrioventricular nodal reentrant tachycardia. Europace 5(3):215–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1099-5129(03)00042-4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Washizuka T, Niwano S, Tsuchida K, Aizawa Y (1999) AV reenterant and idiopathic ventricular double tachycardias: complicated interactions between two tachycardias. Heart 81(3):318–320. https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.81.3.318

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Lim HE, Pak HN, Kim YH (2009) Coexisting idiopathic left ventricular tachycardia and atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia in a patient with Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 32(2):265–268. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8159.2008.02212.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Hu YF, Higa S, Huang JL, Tai CT, Lin YJ, Chang SL et al (2009) Electrophysiologic characteristics and catheter ablation of focal atrial tachycardia with more than one focus. Heart Rhythm 6(2):198–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2008.10.041

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Friedman PL, Dubuc M, Green MS, Jackman WM, Keane DT, Marinchak RA et al (2004) Catheter criyoablation of supraventricular tachycardia: results of multicenter prospective “frosty” trial. Heart Rhythm 1(2):129–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2004.02.022

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kriebel T, Broistedt C, Kroll M, Sigler M, Paul T (2005) Efficacy and safety of cryoenergy in the ablation of atrioventricular reenterant tachycardia substrates in children and adolescents. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 16(9):960–966. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8167.2005.50054.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Friedman PL (2005) Catheter cryoablation of cardiac arrhythmias. Curr Opin Cardiol 20:48–54

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Dubin AM, Van Hare GF (2000) Radiofrequency catheter ablation: indications and complications. Pediatr Cardiol 21(6):551–556. https://doi.org/10.1007/s002460010133

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Schaffer MS, Gow RM, Moak JP, Saul JP (2000) Mortality following radiofrequency catheter ablation (from the pediatric radiofrequency ablation registry). Participating members of the Pediatric Electrophysiology Society. Am J Cardiol 86(6):639–643. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9149(00)01043-2

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Zachariah JP, Walsh EP, Triedman JK et al (2013) Multiple accessory pathways in the young: the impact of structural heart disease. Am Heart J 165(1):87–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2012.10.025

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funds, grants, or other support was received.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kutay Sel.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Ethical Approval

Approval was obtained from the ethics committee of University of Hacettepe. The procedures used in this study adhere to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ertuğrul, İ., Sel, K., Akın, A. et al. Multiple Ablation Targets in Children: Multiple Accessory Pathways and Coexistent Arrhythmia. Pediatr Cardiol 42, 1841–1847 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-021-02676-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-021-02676-0

Keywords

Navigation