Skip to main content

Abnormal Microarray, Clinical Outcomes, and Surgical Risk Scores in Young Children with Cardiac Disease

Abstract

The clinical implications of abnormal chromosomal microarray (CMA) remain unclear for children less than 1 year of age with critical heart disease. Our objective was to determine whether abnormal CMA was related to surgical severity scores or to pre-determined clinical outcomes, including cardiac arrest. Retrospective review of children under 1 year of age admitted to a pediatric cardiac intensive care unit from December, 2014 to September, 2017. Associations between CMA result and cardiac arrest, syndromic abnormalities, and extracardiac anomalies were evaluated. A simple and multivariable logistic regression model was used to analyze associations between STAT mortality category and CMA result. The overall prevalence of abnormal microarray was 48/168 (29%), with peak prevalence in AV septal defects and left-sided obstructive lesions. There was no statistical association between surgical severity scores and abnormal CMA (STAT 1/2 vs. 3+, odds ratio 0.56, p = 0.196). Abnormal CMA was associated with a higher prevalence of cardiac arrest (5/48 abnormal CMA vs. 2/120 normal CMA, p = 0.02). Abnormal CMA was associated with a higher frequency of syndromic abnormalities (18/48 abnormal CMA vs. 13/120 normal CMA, p < 0.001). There was a high prevalence of abnormal CMA findings in the pediatric cardiac population less than 1 year of age (29%), associated with cardiac arrest, but not associated with surgical risk score. The absence of a standardized protocol for ordering a CMA in the setting of congenital heart disease results in a highly variable prevalence data.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

References

  1. Hartman RJ, Rasmussen SA, Botto LD, Riehle-Colarusso T, Martin CL, Cragan JD, Shin M, Correa A (2011) The contribution of chromosomal abnormalities to congenital heart defects: a population-based study. Pediatr Cardiol 32(8):1147–1157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-011-0034-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. van Nisselrooij AEL, Lugthart MA, Clur SA, Linskens IH, Pajkrt E, Rammeloo LA, Rozendaal L, Blom NA, van Lith JMM, Knegt AC, Hoffer MJV, Aten E, Santen GWE, Haak MC (2020) The prevalence of genetic diagnoses in fetuses with severe congenital heart defects. Genet Med 22(7):1206–1214. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41436-020-0791-8

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Nees SN, Chung WK (2020) Genetic basis of human congenital heart disease. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 12(9):a036749. https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a036749

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Meberg A, Hals J, Thaulow E (2007) Congenital heart defects–chromosomal anomalies, syndromes and extracardiac malformations. Acta Paediatr 96(8):1142–1145. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1651-2227.2007.00381.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ahrens-Nicklas RC, Khan S, Garbarini J, Woyciechowski S, D’Alessandro L, Zackai EH, Deardorff MA, Goldmuntz E (2016) Utility of genetic evaluation in infants with congenital heart defects admitted to the cardiac intensive care unit. Am J Med Genet A 170(12):3090–3097. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.a.37891

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Geddes GC, Basel D, Frommelt P, Kinney A, Earing M (2017) Genetic testing protocol reduces costs and increases rate of genetic diagnosis in infants with congenital heart disease. Pediatr Cardiol 38(7):1465–1470. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-017-1685-7

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Buckley JR, Kavarana MN, Chowdhury SM, Scheurer MA (2015) Current practice and utility of chromosome microarray analysis in infants undergoing cardiac surgery. Congenit Heart Dis 10(3):E131-138. https://doi.org/10.1111/chd.12241

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Wu XL, Li R, Fu F, Pan M, Han J, Yang X, Zhang YL, Li FT, Liao C (2017) Chromosome microarray analysis in the investigation of children with congenital heart disease. BMC Pediatr 17(1):117. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-017-0863-3

    CAS  Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Botto LD, Lin AE, Riehle-Colarusso T, Malik S, Correa A (2007) Seeking causes: classifying and evaluating congenital heart defects in etiologic studies. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol 79(10):714–727. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdra.20403

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kearney HM, Thorland EC, Brown KK, Quintero-Rivera F, South ST (2011) American college of medical genetics standards and guidelines for interpretation and reporting of postnatal constitutional copy number variants. Genet Med 13(7):680–685. https://doi.org/10.1097/GIM.0b013e3182217a3a

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Information NCfB (2019) GTR: Genetic Testing Registry. U.S. National Library of Medicine. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gtr/. Accessed 3 Jan 2019

  12. Riggs ER, Andersen EF, Cherry AM, Kantarci S, Kearney H, Patel A, Raca G, Ritter DI, South ST, Thorland EC, Pineda-Alvarez D, Aradhya S, Martin CL (2020) Technical standards for the interpretation and reporting of constitutional copy-number variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) and the Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen). Genet Med 22(2):245–257. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41436-019-0686-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Alten JA, Klugman D, Raymond TT, Cooper DS, Donohue JE, Zhang W, Pasquali SK, Gaies MG (2017) Epidemiology and outcomes of cardiac arrest in pediatric cardiac ICUs. Pediatr Crit Care Med 18(10):935–943. https://doi.org/10.1097/pcc.0000000000001273

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Boskovski MT, Homsy J, Nathan M, Sleeper LA, Morton S, Manheimer KB, Tai A, Gorham J, Lewis M, Swartz M, Alfieris GM, Bacha EA, Karimi M, Meyer D, Nguyen K, Bernstein D, Romano-Adesman A, Porter GA Jr, Goldmuntz E, Chung WK, Srivastava D, Kaltman JR, Tristani-Firouzi M, Lifton R, Roberts AE, Gaynor JW, Gelb BD, Kim R, Seidman JG, Brueckner M, Mayer JE Jr, Newburger JW, Seidman CE (2020) De novo damaging variants, clinical phenotypes, and post-operative outcomes in congenital heart disease. Circ Genom Precis Med 13(4):e002836. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCGEN.119.002836

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Helm BM, Freeze SL (2016) Genetic evaluation and use of chromosome microarray in patients with isolated heart defects: benefits and challenges of a new model in cardiovascular care. Front Cardiovasc Med 3:19. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2016.00019

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Committee on Genetics and the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (2016) Committee opinion no.682: microarrays and next-generation sequencing technology: the use of advanced genetic diagnostic tools in obstetrics and gynecology. Obstet Gynecol 128(6):e262–e268. https://doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000001817

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Research reported in this publication was supported, in part, by the National Institutes of Health, National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, grant number K23HL130554, the American Heart Association Mentored Clinical and Population Research Award (Dallas, TX). REDCap access was provided by Northwestern University Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute, funded in part by NIH UL1TR001422.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

KM: Conceptualization, Data curation, Investigation, Visualization, Writing-Original draft preparation WTR: Formal analysis, Software SC: Writing—Review & Editing, Validation CAC: Writing—Review & Editing LCB: Formal analysis, Software GW: Funding Acquisition, Methodology, Supervision, Writing—Review & Editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gregory Webster.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to report.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (PDF 148 kb)

Supplementary file2 (PDF 142 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

McAfee, K., Rosenow, W.T., Cherny, S. et al. Abnormal Microarray, Clinical Outcomes, and Surgical Risk Scores in Young Children with Cardiac Disease. Pediatr Cardiol 42, 1785–1791 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-021-02664-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-021-02664-4

Keywords

  • Pediatric
  • Congenital heart disease
  • Chromosomal microarray
  • Cardiac arrest
  • Surgical risk score