Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Aortic Root Dilation in Patients with 22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome Without Intracardiac Anomalies

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Cardiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aortic root dilation (ARD) has been reported in patients with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome (22q11.2DS) with and without congenital heart defects (CHDs). However, the long-term implications of isolated ARD in 22q11.2DS remain undefined. In this study, we measured aortic root size and estimated the probability of changing between normal aortic root size and ARD during follow up to understand the prevalence, longitudinal course, and clinical risk factors for ARD in patients with 22q11.2DS without intracardiac CHDs. Aortic root size was measured in 251 patients with 432 studies. Forty-one patients (16.3%) had ARD on at least one echocardiogram and the cohort sinus Z-score was increased on the last echocardiogram [mean (1.09, SD 1.24) and median (1.20, min  − 1.90 and max 5.40)]. Transition probability analysis showed that 8.1% of patients developed ARD and 45.4% of patients with ARD reverted to normal at the next echocardiogram. The risk of ARD over time was significantly associated with male sex (OR 3.06, 95% CI 1.41–6.65; p = 0.004), but not with age or presence of an aortic arch anomaly. Compared to a sinus Z-score ≥ 2, initial Z-score < 2 was associated with 14.3 times lower risk of developing sinus Z-score ≥ 3 at follow up. Sinus Z-score overall decreased by age, and males had a higher Z-score than females (ß = 0.72, SE = 0.14, p < 0.001). Though only a few patients had a Z-score > 4, and patients with initial Z-scores < 2 seem unlikely to develop clinically significant disease, screening practices remain incompletely defined such that periodic evaluation appears warranted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Data can be made available upon request.

References

  1. McDonald-McGinn DM, Sullivan K, Marino B, Philip N, Swillen A, Vortsman J, Zackai EH, Emanuel B, Vermeesch J, Morrow B, Scambler P, Bassett A (2015) 22q11.2 deletion syndrome. Nat Rev Dis Prim 19(1):15071. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrdp.2015.71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. John AS, McDonald-McGinn DM, Zackai EH, Goldmuntz E (2009) Aortic root dilation in patients with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome. Am J Med Genet Part A 149A:939–942. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.a.32770

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. John A, Rychik J, Khan M, Yang W, Goldmuntz E (2014) 22q11.2 deletion syndrome as a risk factor for aortic root dilation in tetralogy of Fallot. Cardiol Young 24(2):303–310. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1047951113000309

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Koichiro N (2005) Aortic root dilation in tetralogy of Fallot long-term after repair—histology of the aorta in tetralogy of Fallot: evidence of intrinsic aortopathy. Int J of Cardiol 103(2):117–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2004.07.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Yetman AJ, Graham T (2009) The dilated aorta in patients with congenital cardiac defects. J Am Coll Cardiol 53(6):461–467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2008.10.035

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lopez L, Colan S, Stylianou M et al (2017) Relationship of echocardiographic Z scores adjusted for body surface area to age, sex, race, and ethnicity: the pediatric heart network normal echocardiogram database. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 10(11):e006979. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCIMAGING.117.006979

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Min J, Wen X, Xue H, Wang Y (2018) Ethnic disparities in childhood BMI trajectories and obesity and potential causes among 29,250 US children: findings from the early childhood longitudinal study-birth and kindergarten cohorts. Int J Obes 42(9):1661–1670. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41366-018-0091-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Wen X, Kleinman K, Gillman MW, Rifas-Shiman SL, Taveras EM (2012) Childhood body mass index trajectories: modeling, characterizing, pairwise correlations and socio-demographic predictors of trajectory characteristics. BMC Med Res Methodol 12:38. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2288-12-38

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Ryoo JH, Long JD, Welch GW, Reynolds A, Swearer SM (2017) Fitting the fractional polynomial model to non-gaussian longitudinal data. Front Psychol 8:1431. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01431

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Stata (2018) Fractional polynomial regression syntax menu. Stata.com http://www.stata.com/manuals13/rfp.pdf. Accessed 9 Nov 2018

  11. Stata (2018) Fp postestimation-postestimation tools for fp. Stata.com. http://www.stata.com/manuals13/rfp.pdf. Accessed 9 Nov 2018

  12. Royston R (2017) Model selection for univariable fractional polynomials. Stata J 17(3):619–629

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. The US CDC 2000 Growth Chartsm (2018) Defining childhood obesity. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. http://www.cdc.gov/obesity/childhood/defining.html. Accessed 9 November 2018

  14. Niwa K, Samuel CS, Webb GD, Gatzoulis MA (2002) Progressive aortic root dilatation in adults after repair of tetralogy of Fallot. Circulation 106(11):1374–1378. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.CIR.0000028462.88597.AD

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Davies RR, Goldstein LJ, Coady MA, Tittle SL, Rizzo JA, Kopf GS, Elefteraides JA (2002) Yearly rupture or dissection rates for thoracic aortic aneurysms: simple prediction based on size. Ann Thorac Surg 73(1):17–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0003-4975(01)03236-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Nataf P, Lansac E (2006) Dilation of the thoracic aorta: medical and surgical management. Heart 92(9):1345–1352. https://doi.org/10.1136/hrt.2005.074781

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. King C (2015) Undiagnosed DiGeorge syndrome presenting in middle age with an aortic root aneurysm and chronic dissection. BMJ Case Rep. https://doi.org/10.1136/bcr-2015-210697

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chiara Pandolfi de Rinaldis.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Consent to Participate

Consistent with CFR 46.116(d), we were granted a waiver of informed consent given that the research involved no more than minimal risks to subjects, the waiver would not adversely affect the rights and welfare of the subjects and that the research could not practicably be carried out without a waiver.

Consent for Publication

Consistent with CFR 46.116(d), we were granted a waiver of consent given that the research involved no more than minimal risks to subjects, the waiver would not adversely affect the rights and welfare of the subjects and that the research could not practicably be carried out without a waiver.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 15 kb)

246_2021_2645_MOESM2_ESM.pdf

Supplementary file2 Distribution of Sinus Z-Score at last echocardiogram among subjects with 2+ echocardiograms. Red represents Z-scores ≥ 2.5 (PDF 45 kb)

246_2021_2645_MOESM3_ESM.pdf

Supplementary file3 The change in Z-score by age at the level of the annulus, sinus and sinotubular junction among subjects with 2+ echocardiograms (a) The change in annulus Z-score by age. Predicted Annulus Z-score= 0.24 - 0.08*log(age) - 0.07*age(-0.5)+ 0.52*male - 0.04*AAA (b) The change in sinus Z-score by age. Predicted Sinus Z-score= -0.05 - 0.17*sqrt(age) - 0.05*age(-0.5)+ 1.06*male + 0.71*AAA (c) The change in sinotubular junction Z-score by age. Predicted STJ Z-score= 0.08 - 0.16*sqrt(age) - 0.04*age(-0.5)+ 0.60*male - 0.001*AAA. The graph describes aortic size between 2-18 years old given the 5-95 percentile of BSA from the nationally representative height and weight data in 2000 CDC growth chart. Mixed-effects model with fractional polynomial was used after adjusting for sex and AAA (PDF 113 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

de Rinaldis, C.P., Butensky, A., Patel, S. et al. Aortic Root Dilation in Patients with 22q11.2 Deletion Syndrome Without Intracardiac Anomalies. Pediatr Cardiol 42, 1594–1600 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-021-02645-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-021-02645-7

Keywords

Navigation