Abstract
Our institution established a Fontan surveillance plan, which included ambulatory rhythm monitoring (ARM) at 6, 10, 13, 16 and 19 years old, for early detection of Fontan-associated complications. We conducted a retrospective chart review of Fontan patients followed at our institution 2014–2018 to determine the utility of surveillance ARMs. 139 ARMs from 83 patients were included. ARMs with supraventricular tachycardia, sinus node dysfunction, accelerated junctional rhythm, > 1st degree atrioventricular block, and complex ventricular ectopy were classified as positive for arrhythmia. Arrhythmias were occult if detected on surveillance ARM. The ARM indication was surveillance in 78 (56%) and clinically indicated in 61 (44%). 52 (37%) ARMs in 27 (33%) patients had an arrhythmia. There was no difference in the age of patients with and without arrhythmias [median 10.9 (6.5, 17.1 years) vs. 8.8 (7, 13.6 years), p = 0.5]. Clinically indicated ARMs more frequently demonstrated arrhythmias than surveillance ARMs (52% vs. 26%, p < 0.01). Compared to patients without arrhythmias, those with arrhythmias were more likely to be female (48% vs. 23%, p = 0.02), have a single right ventricle (46% vs. 19%, p < 0.01) and longer QRS duration on ECG [100 (91, 116 ms) vs. 94 (84, 104 ms), p = 0.046]. Patients with occult arrhythmias were less likely to have moderate to severe atrioventricular valvar regurgitation (0% vs. 46%; p = 0.04) or ventricular dysfunction (0% vs. 46%; p = 0.04) than those with clinical arrhythmia(s). Arrhythmia findings resulted in change in management for 16/52 (31%) ARMs. The findings suggest the frequent presence of arrhythmias on periodic ARMs in patients following the Fontan procedure regardless of symptomatic status.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Data availability
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this article.
Code availability
JMP® PRO version 14.0.0; SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.
References
Fontan F, Baudet E (1971) Surgical repair of tricuspid atresia. Thorax 26:240–248
Wernovsky G, Rome JJ, Tabbutt S et al (2006) Guidelines for the outpatient management of complex congenital heart disease. Congenit Heart Dis 1:10–26
Rychik J, Atz AM, Celermajer DS, et al (2019) Evaluation and management of the child and adult with fontan circulation: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation CIR0000000000000696.
Dennis M, Zannino D, du Plessis K et al (2018) Clinical outcomes in adolescents and adults after the Fontan procedure. J Am Coll Cardiol 71:1009–1017
Yap S-C, Harris L, Chauhan VS, Oechslin EN, Silversides CK (2011) Identifying high risk in adults with congenital heart disease and atrial arrhythmias. Am J Cardiol 108:723–728
Pundi KN, Johnson JN, Dearani JA et al (2015) 40-Year follow-up after the Fontan operation: long-term outcomes of 1,052 patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 66:1700–1710
Rijnbeek PR, Witsenburg M, Schrama E, Hess J, Kors JA (2001) New normal limits for the paediatric electrocardiogram. Eur Heart J 22:702–711
Stephenson EA, Lu M, Berul CI et al (2010) Arrhythmias in a contemporary Fontan cohort: prevalence and clinical associations in a multicenter cross-sectional study. J Am Coll Cardiol 56:890–896
Pundi KN, Pundi KN, Johnson JN et al (2017) Sudden cardiac death and late arrhythmias after the Fontan operation. Congenit Heart Dis 12:17–23
d’Udekem Y, Iyengar AJ, Cochrane AD et al (2007) The Fontan procedure: contemporary techniques have improved long-term outcomes. Circulation 116:I157-164
Quinton E, Nightingale P, Hudsmith L et al (2015) Prevalence of atrial tachyarrhythmia in adults after Fontan operation. Heart 101:1672–1677
Di Maria MV, Brown DW, Cetta F et al (2019) Surveillance testing and preventive care after Fontan operation: a multi-institutional survey. Pediatr Cardiol 40:110–115
Deal BJ, Jacobs ML (2012) Management of the failing Fontan circulation. Heart 98:1098–1104
Funding
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the study conception and design, material preparation, data collection and analysis. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Taylor P. Saley and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no relevant conflicts of interest to disclose.
Ethical approval
This research study was conducted retrospectively from data obtained for clinical purposes. We consulted extensively with the IRB of Children’s Hospital Los Angeles who determined that our study did not need ethical approval. An IRB official waiver of ethical approval was granted from the IRB of Children’s Hospital Los Angeles.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Saley, T.P., Patel, N.D., Bar-Cohen, Y. et al. Utility of Surveillance Ambulatory Rhythm Monitoring in the Pediatric Fontan Population. Pediatr Cardiol 42, 1442–1448 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-021-02630-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-021-02630-0