Skip to main content
Log in

Utility of Surveillance Ambulatory Rhythm Monitoring in the Pediatric Fontan Population

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Cardiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Our institution established a Fontan surveillance plan, which included ambulatory rhythm monitoring (ARM) at 6, 10, 13, 16 and 19 years old, for early detection of Fontan-associated complications. We conducted a retrospective chart review of Fontan patients followed at our institution 2014–2018 to determine the utility of surveillance ARMs. 139 ARMs from 83 patients were included. ARMs with supraventricular tachycardia, sinus node dysfunction, accelerated junctional rhythm, > 1st degree atrioventricular block, and complex ventricular ectopy were classified as positive for arrhythmia. Arrhythmias were occult if detected on surveillance ARM. The ARM indication was surveillance in 78 (56%) and clinically indicated in 61 (44%). 52 (37%) ARMs in 27 (33%) patients had an arrhythmia. There was no difference in the age of patients with and without arrhythmias [median 10.9 (6.5, 17.1 years) vs. 8.8 (7, 13.6 years), p = 0.5]. Clinically indicated ARMs more frequently demonstrated arrhythmias than surveillance ARMs (52% vs. 26%, p < 0.01). Compared to patients without arrhythmias, those with arrhythmias were more likely to be female (48% vs. 23%, p = 0.02), have a single right ventricle (46% vs. 19%, p < 0.01) and longer QRS duration on ECG [100 (91, 116 ms) vs. 94 (84, 104 ms), p = 0.046]. Patients with occult arrhythmias were less likely to have moderate to severe atrioventricular valvar regurgitation (0% vs. 46%; p = 0.04) or ventricular dysfunction (0% vs. 46%; p = 0.04) than those with clinical arrhythmia(s). Arrhythmia findings resulted in change in management for 16/52 (31%) ARMs. The findings suggest the frequent presence of arrhythmias on periodic ARMs in patients following the Fontan procedure regardless of symptomatic status.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this article.

Code availability

JMP® PRO version 14.0.0; SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.

References

  1. Fontan F, Baudet E (1971) Surgical repair of tricuspid atresia. Thorax 26:240–248

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Wernovsky G, Rome JJ, Tabbutt S et al (2006) Guidelines for the outpatient management of complex congenital heart disease. Congenit Heart Dis 1:10–26

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Rychik J, Atz AM, Celermajer DS, et al (2019) Evaluation and management of the child and adult with fontan circulation: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation CIR0000000000000696.

  4. Dennis M, Zannino D, du Plessis K et al (2018) Clinical outcomes in adolescents and adults after the Fontan procedure. J Am Coll Cardiol 71:1009–1017

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Yap S-C, Harris L, Chauhan VS, Oechslin EN, Silversides CK (2011) Identifying high risk in adults with congenital heart disease and atrial arrhythmias. Am J Cardiol 108:723–728

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Pundi KN, Johnson JN, Dearani JA et al (2015) 40-Year follow-up after the Fontan operation: long-term outcomes of 1,052 patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 66:1700–1710

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Rijnbeek PR, Witsenburg M, Schrama E, Hess J, Kors JA (2001) New normal limits for the paediatric electrocardiogram. Eur Heart J 22:702–711

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Stephenson EA, Lu M, Berul CI et al (2010) Arrhythmias in a contemporary Fontan cohort: prevalence and clinical associations in a multicenter cross-sectional study. J Am Coll Cardiol 56:890–896

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Pundi KN, Pundi KN, Johnson JN et al (2017) Sudden cardiac death and late arrhythmias after the Fontan operation. Congenit Heart Dis 12:17–23

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. d’Udekem Y, Iyengar AJ, Cochrane AD et al (2007) The Fontan procedure: contemporary techniques have improved long-term outcomes. Circulation 116:I157-164

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Quinton E, Nightingale P, Hudsmith L et al (2015) Prevalence of atrial tachyarrhythmia in adults after Fontan operation. Heart 101:1672–1677

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Di Maria MV, Brown DW, Cetta F et al (2019) Surveillance testing and preventive care after Fontan operation: a multi-institutional survey. Pediatr Cardiol 40:110–115

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Deal BJ, Jacobs ML (2012) Management of the failing Fontan circulation. Heart 98:1098–1104

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design, material preparation, data collection and analysis. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Taylor P. Saley and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Allison C. Hill.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no relevant conflicts of interest to disclose.

Ethical approval

This research study was conducted retrospectively from data obtained for clinical purposes. We consulted extensively with the IRB of Children’s Hospital Los Angeles who determined that our study did not need ethical approval. An IRB official waiver of ethical approval was granted from the IRB of Children’s Hospital Los Angeles.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Saley, T.P., Patel, N.D., Bar-Cohen, Y. et al. Utility of Surveillance Ambulatory Rhythm Monitoring in the Pediatric Fontan Population. Pediatr Cardiol 42, 1442–1448 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-021-02630-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-021-02630-0

Keywords

Navigation