Skip to main content
Log in

Diagnostic Accuracy and Safety of Confirm Rx™ Insertable Cardiac Monitor in Pediatric Patients

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Cardiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Insertable cardiac monitors (ICM) are subcutaneously implanted devices that monitor a patient’s heart rate and rhythm (Rossano in Pediatrics 112(3):e228, 2003). The diagnostic accuracy and safety of the Confirm RxTM (Abbott, Minneapolis, MN) ICM in pediatric patients is unknown. This is a single center, retrospective, IRB-approved review of patients ≤ 21 years implanted with Confirm RxTM ICMs from 2017 to 2020. Data collected included demographics, indications, presence of P-wave and R-wave amplitude at implantation and follow-up, number/appropriateness of transmissions pre and post implementation of SharpSenseTM technology, reprogramming to improve accuracy, time from implantation to arrhythmia detection, and complications. There were 29 patients (median age: 8 years, 59% females). P-waves were identified in all patients and average R-wave amplitude was 0.85 mV (0.26–1.03 mV). There was no significant difference in R-wave amplitude based on size (BSA ≥ 1.5 m2: 0.76 mV, < 1.5 m2: 0.91 mV) or congenital heart disease (+CHD: 0.86 mV, −CHD: 0.85 mV). Arrhythmias identified were the following: wide complex tachycardia (1), supraventricular tachycardia (4), bradycardia/sinus pause (3), and premature ventricular contraction (1). SharpSenseTM implementation decreased the false-positive rate in device-initiated transmissions (55.4% to 0%, p < 0.00001). Average time from implantation to arrhythmia detection was 2.63 months (range: 0–8.8). A single complication of cellulitis occurred. Confirm RxTM is appropriate for implant in pediatric patients regardless of age, BSA, or CHD. Implementation of SharpSense™ technology dramatically decreased the false-positive rate. Follow-up studies could utilize additional monitoring devices to provide analysis on potential events that the Confirm RxTM ICM missed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rossano J, Bloemers B, Sreeram N, Balaji S, Shah MJ (2003) Efficacy of implantable loop recorders in establishing symptom-rhythm correlation in young patients with syncope and palpitations. Pediatrics 112(3):e228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bisignani A, De Bonis S, Mancuso L, Ceravolo G, Bisignani G (2019) Implantable loop recorder in clinical practice. J Arrhythm 35(1):25–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Giancaterino S, Lupercio F, Nishimura M, Hsu JC (2018) Current and future use of insertable cardiac monitors. JACC Clin Electrophysiol 4(11):1383–1396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Padmanabhan D, Kancharla K, El-Harasis MA et al (2019) Diagnostic and therapeutic value of implantable loop recorder: a tertiary care center experience. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 42(1):38–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dwivedi A, Joza J, Malkani K et al (2018) Implantable Loop Recorder in Inherited Arrhythmia Diseases: A Critical Tool for Symptom Diagnosis and Advanced Risk Stratification. JACC Clin Electrophysiol 4(10):1372–1374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bezzerides VJ, Walsh A, Martuscello M et al (2019) The Real-World Utility of the LINQ Implantable Loop Recorder in Pediatric and Adult Congenital Heart Patients. JACC Clin Electrophysiol 5(2):245–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Lee R, Mittal S (2018) Utility and limitations of long-term monitoring of atrial fibrillation using an implantable loop recorder. Heart Rhythm 15(2):287–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Sakhi R, Theuns D, Szili-Torok T, Yap SC (2019) Insertable cardiac monitors: current indications and devices. Expert Rev Med Devices 16(1):45–55

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. D’Souza R, Thomas E, Macicek S, Aziz P, Shivapour JK, Snyder C (2017) P-and R-wave amplitude sensed by reveal LINQt loop recorder in pediatric patients. J Innovat Cardiac Rhythm Manage. 8:2584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Drago F, Battipaglia I, Di Mambro C (2018) Neonatal and pediatric arrhythmias: clinical and electrocardiographic aspects. Card Electrophysiol Clin 10(2):397–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Abbott. Confirm Rx™ ICM With SharpSense™ Technology. https://www.cardiovascular.abbott/us/en/hcp/products/cardiac-rhythm-management/confirm-rx-insertable-cardiac-monitor.html. Published 2020. Accessed.

Download references

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors are responsible for the contents and have read and approved the manuscript for submission.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher S. Snyder.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yoon, J.G., Fares, M., Hoyt, W. et al. Diagnostic Accuracy and Safety of Confirm Rx™ Insertable Cardiac Monitor in Pediatric Patients. Pediatr Cardiol 42, 142–147 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-020-02463-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-020-02463-3

Keywords

Navigation