Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Evaluation of the Left Ventricular Hemodynamic Status of Double-Root Translocation Patients Through Vector Flow Mapping

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Cardiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The double-root translocation (DRT) procedure is considered as a new choice for surgical management of complex congenital heart disease. Our study aims to investigate the left ventricular hemodynamic status after DRT by energy loss (EL), involving 42 patients who underwent DRT as well as 42 healthy volunteers as controls. The EL of left ventricle (LV) during different periods (rapid filling-RF, atrial contraction-AC, isovolumic contraction-IVC, rapid ejection-RE) of the same cardiac cycle were obtained and analyzed. Compared to the controls, global LV and apical three chamber-EL at AC and IVC periods in DRT group were higher (p < 0.05), and EL at RE period of DRT group was moderately lower. In the correlation analysis, the global EL at the RF was correlated with E wave (r = 0.47, p = 0.03), E/e′ (r = 0.50, p = 0.02), BSA (r = − 0.54, p = 0.01), and age (r = − 0.67, p < 0.001). AC and RE- global EL were significantly correlated with E/e′ (r = 0.49, r = 0.59, p < 0.05). There was a strong positive correlation between E/e′ and global EL at the IVC (r = 0.62, p = 0.003) and a moderate negative correlation with age (r = − 0.44, p = 0.04). The present study confirms that EL is a feasible and reproducible indicator for quantitatively evaluating LV hemodynamic status in patients who underwent DRT and reveals that DRT can lead to approximatively normal long-term hemodynamic performance of LV.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rastelli GC, McGoon DC, Wallace RB (1969) Anatomic correction of transposition of the great arteries with ventricular septal defect and subpulmonary stenosis. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 58:545–552

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lecompte Y, Neveux JY, Leca F et al (1982) Reconstruction of the pulmonary outflow tract without prosthetic conduit. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 84:727–733

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Hu SS, Liu ZG, Li SJ et al (2008) Strategy for biventricular outflow tract reconstruction: Rastelli, REV, or Nikaidoh procedure? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 135:331–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2007.09.060

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hu S, Xie Y, Li S et al (2010) Double-root translocation for doubleoutlet right ventricle with noncommitted ventricular septal defect or double-outlet right ventricle with subpulmonary ventricular septal defect associated with pulmonary stenosis: an optimized solution. Ann Thorac Surg 89:1360–1365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.02.007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hayashi T, Itatani K, Inuzuka R et al (2015) Dissipative energy loss within the left ventricle detected by vector flow mapping in children: normal values and effects of age and heart rate. J Cardiol 66:403–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jjcc.2014.12.012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Leischik R, Littwitz H, Dworrak B et al (2015) Echocardiographic evaluation of left atrial mechanics: function, history, novel techniques, advantages, and pitfalls. Biomed Res Int 2015:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/765921

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Uejima T, Koike A, Sawada H et al (2010) A new echocardiographic method for identifying vortex flow in the left ventricle: numerical validation. Ultrasound Med Biol 36:772–788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2010.02.017

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Akiyama K, Maeda S, Matsuyama T et al (2017) Vector flow mapping analysis of left ventricular energetic performance in healthy adult volunteers. BMC Cardiovasc Disord 17:21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-016-0444-7

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Zhong Y, Liu YT, Wu T et al (2016) Assessment of left ventricular dissipative energy loss by vector flow mapping in patients with end-stage renal disease. J Ultrasound Med 35:965–973. https://doi.org/10.7863/ultra.15.06009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Li CM, Bai WJ, Liu YT, Tang H, Rao L (2017) Dissipative energy loss within the left ventricle detected by vector flow mapping in diabetic patients with controlled and uncontrolled blood glucose levels. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 33:1151–1158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-017-1100-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bahlmann E, Gerdts E, Cramariuc D et al (2013) Prognostic value of energy loss index in asymptomatic aortic stenosis. Circulation 127:1149–1156. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.078857

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Stugaard M, Koriyama H, Katsuki K et al (2015) Energy loss in the left ventricle obtained by vector flow mapping as a new quantitative measure of severity of aortic regurgitation: a combined experimental and clinical study. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 16:723–730. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jev035

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lang RM, Badano LP, Mor-Avi V et al (2015) Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 28(1):1–39. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/jew041

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Itatani K, Okada T, Uejima T et al (2013) Intraventricular flow velocity vector visualization based on the continuity equation and measurements of vorticity and wall shear stress. Jpn J Appl Phys 52:07–16. https://doi.org/10.7567/JJAP.52.07HF16

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Loerakker S, Cox L, van Heijst G et al (2008) Influence of dilated cardiomyopathy and a left ventricular assist device on vortex dynamics in the left ventricle. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng 11(6):649–660

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Dr. Yiran Hu ( Fuwai Hospital, Beijing, China) for his assistance of echocardiographic data analysis.

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

HL involved in design and drafting article. QLM and YHF performed data collection and data analysis. RL did critical revision of article. SHH and KJP participated in approval of the article.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kunjing Pang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest with respect to this manuscript.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in this study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, H., Hu, S., Meng, Q. et al. Evaluation of the Left Ventricular Hemodynamic Status of Double-Root Translocation Patients Through Vector Flow Mapping. Pediatr Cardiol 41, 1466–1472 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-020-02407-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-020-02407-x

Keywords

Navigation