Skip to main content
Log in

Right Ventricular Systolic Function After the Cone Procedure for Ebstein's Anomaly: Comparison Between Echocardiography and Cardiac Magnetic Resonance

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Cardiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although the Cone procedure has improved outcomes for patients with Ebstein´s anomaly (EA), neither RV systolic function recovery in long-term follow-up nor the best echocardiographic parameters to assess RV function are well established. Thus, we evaluated RV performance after the Cone procedure comparing two-dimensional (2DEcho) and three-dimensional (3DEcho) echocardiography to cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR). We assessed 27 EA patients after the Cone procedure (53% female, median age of 20 years at the procedure, median post-operative follow-up duration of 8 years). Echocardiography was performed 4 h apart from the CMR. RV global longitudinal strain (GLS), fractional area change (FAC), tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE), myocardial performance index and tissue Doppler S’ velocity were assessed using 2DEcho, whereas 3DEcho was used to evaluate RV volumes and ejection fraction (RVEF). Echocardiographic variables were compared to CMR-RVEF. All patients were in the NYHA functional class I. Median TAPSE was 15.9 mm, FAC 30.2%, and RV-GLS -15%; median RVEF by 3DEcho was 31.9% and 43% by CMR. Among 2DEcho parameters, RV-GLS and FAC had a substantial correlation with CMR-RVEF (r =  − 0.63 and r = 0.55, respectively); from 3DEcho, the indexed RV volumes and RVEF were closely correlated with CMR (RV-EDVi, r = 0.60, RV-ESVi, r = 0.72; and RVEF r = 0.60). RV systolic function is impaired years after the Cone procedure, despite a good clinical status. FAC and RV-GLS are useful 2DEcho tools to assess RV function in these patients; however, 3DEcho measurements appear to provide a better RV assessment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

EA:

Ebstein’s anomaly

RV:

Right ventricle

2DEcho:

Two-dimensional echocardiography

3DEcho:

Three-dimensional echocardiography

RVEF:

Right ventricle ejection fraction

CMR:

Cardiac magnetic resonance

TR:

Tricuspid regurgitation

RV-GLS:

Right ventricular global longitudinal strain

RV-FLS:

Right ventricular free wall longitudinal strain

FAC:

Fractional area change

TAPSE:

Tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion

MPI:

Myocardial performance index

RV-EDV:

Right ventricle end-diastolic volume

RV-EDVi:

Indexed right ventricle end-diastolic volume

RV-ESV:

Right ventricle end-systolic volume

RV-ESVi:

Indexed right ventricle end-systolic volume

NYHA:

New York Heart Association

References

  1. Brown ML, Dearani JA (2009) Ebstein malformation of the tricuspid valve: current concepts in management and outcomes. Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med 11:396–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Brown ML, Dearani JA (2011) Ebstein anomaly. In: Gatzoulis MA, Webb GD, Daubeney PEF (eds) Diagnosis and Management of adult congenital heart disease, vol 39. Elsevier Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 288–294

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Anderson KR, Lie JT (1979) The right ventricular myocardium in Ebstein’s anomaly: a morphometric histopathologic study. Mayo Clin Proc 54:181–184

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lee CM, Sheehan FH, Bouzas B, Chen SS, Gatzoulis MA, Kilner PJ (2013) The shape and function of the right ventricle in Ebstein’s anomaly. Int J Cardiol 167:704–710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gutberlet M, Oellinger H, Ewert P, Nagdyman N, Amthauer H, Hoffmann T et al (2000) Pre- and post-operative evaluation of ventricular function, muscle mass and valve morphology by magnetic resonance tomography in Ebstein’s anomaly. Rofo 172:436–442

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Therrien J, Henein MY, Li W, Somerville J, Rigby M (2000) Right ventricular long axis function in adults and children with Ebstein’s malformation. Int J Cardiol 73:243–249

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Vettukattil JJ, Bharucha T, Anderson RH (2007) Defining Ebstein’s malformation using three-dimensional echocardiography. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 6:685–690

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lu X, Vyacheslav N, Bu L, Stolpen A, Ayres N, Pignatelli RH et al (2008) Accuracy and reproducibility of real-time three-dimensional echocardiography for assessment of right ventricular volumes and ejection fraction in children. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 21:84–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. da Silva JP, Baumgratz JF, da Fonseca L, Franchi SM, Lopes LM, Tavares GM et al (2007) The cone reconstruction of the tricuspid valve in Ebstein’s anomaly. The operation: early and midterm results. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 133:215–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Anderson HN, Dearani JA, Said SM, Norris MD, Pundi KN, Miller AR et al (2014) Cone reconstruction in children with Ebstein anomaly: the Mayo Clinic experience. Congenit Heart Dis 9:266–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dearani JA, Said SM, O’Leary PW, Burkhart HM, Barnes RD, Cetta F (2013) Anatomic repair of Ebstein’s malformation: lessons learned with cone reconstruction. Ann Thorac Surg, 95:220–6; discussion 6–8

  12. Vogel M, Marx GR, Tworetzky W, Cecchin F, Graham D, Mayer JE et al (2012) Ebstein’s malformation of the tricuspid valve: short-term outcomes of the ‘‘cone procedure’’ versus conventional surgery. Congenit Heart Dis 7:50–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lange R, Burri M, Eschenbach LK, Badiu CC, daSilva JP, Nagdyman N, et al (2015) Da Silva’s cone repair for Ebstein’s anomaly: effect on right ventricular size and function. Eur J Cardio Thorac Surg 48(2):316–320

  14. Ibrahim M, Tsang VT, Caruana M, Hughes ML, Jenkyns S, Perdreau E et al (2015) Cone reconstruction for Ebstein’s anomaly: patient outcomes, biventricular function and cardiopulmonary exercise capacity. J Thorac Cadiovasc Surg 149(9):1144–1150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Lang RM, Badano LP, Mor-Avi V, Afilalo J, Armstrong A, Ernande L et al (2015) Recommendation for cardiac chamber quantification by Echocardiography in adults: an update from the American Society of Echocardiorgaphy and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 28(1):1–39e14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Morris DA, Krisper M, Nakatani S, Kohncke C, Otsuji Y, Belyavskiy E et al (2017) Normal range and usefulness of right ventricular systolic strain to detect subtle right ventricular systolic abnormalities in patiens with heart failure: a multicentre study. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 18(2):212–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zoghbi WA, Adams D, Bonow RO, Enriquez-Sarano M, Foster E, Graysburn PA et al (2017) Recommendations for noninvasive evaluation of native valvular regurgitation. A report from the American Society of Echocardiography developed in collaboration with the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 30(4):303–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Perdreau E, Tsang V, Hughes ML, Ibrahim M, Kataria S, Janagarajan K et al (2018) Change in biventricular function after cone reconstruction of Ebstein´s anomaly: an echocardiographic study. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 19(7):808–815

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Prakasa KR, Wang J, Tandri H, Dalai D, Bomma C, Chojnowski R et al (2007) Utility of tissue Doppler and strain echocardiography in arrythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol 100(3):507–512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kühn A, Meierhofer C, Rutz T, Rondak I-C, Röhlig C, Schreiber C et al (2016) Non-volumetric echocardiographic indices and qualitative assessment of right ventricular systolic function in Ebstein’s anomaly: comparison with CMR-derived ejection fraction in 49 patients. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 17:930–935

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Avitabile CM, Whitehead K, Fogel M, Mercer-Rosa L (2014) Tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion does not correlate with right ventricular ejection fraction in patients with hypoplastic left heart syndrome after Fontan operation. Pediatr Cardiol 35(7):1253–1258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Pettersen E, Helle-Valle T, Edvardsen T, Lindberg H, Smith HJ, Smevik B et al (2007) Contraction pattern of the systemic right ventricle shift from longitudinal to circumferential shortening and absent global ventricular torsion. J Am Coll Cardiol 49:2450–2456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Sheehan FH, Ge S, Vick GW III, Urnes K, Kerwin WS, Bolson EL et al (2008) Three-dimensional shape analysis of right ventricular remodeling in repaired tetralogy of Fallot. Am J Cardiol 101:107–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Van der Zwann HB, Geleijnse NL, McGhie JS, Boersma E, Helbing WA, Meijboom FJ et al (2011) Right ventricular quantification in clinical practice: two-dimensional vs* three-dimensional echocardiography compared with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Eur J Echocardiogr 12(9):656–664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kühl HP, Schreckenberg M, Rulands D, Katoh M, Schäfer W, Schummers G et al (2004) High-resolution transthoracic real-time three-dimensional echocardiography: quantification of cardiac volumes and function using semi-automatic border detection and comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 43(11):2083–2090

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ostenfeld E, Carlsson M, Shahgaldi K, Roijer A, Holm J (2012) Manual correction of semi-automatic three-dimensional echocardiography is needed for right ventricular assessment in adults; validation with cardiac magnetic resonance. Cardiovasc Ultrasound. https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-7120-10-1

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Crean AM, Maredia N, Ballard G, Menezes R, Whartson G, Foster J et al (2011) 3D Echo systematically underestimated right ventricular volumes compared to cardiovascular magnetic resonance in adult congenital heart disease with moderate to severe RV dilatation. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 13(1):78

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. Dr. Mercer-Rosa is supported by grant NIH K01HL125521 and by Pulmonary Hypertension Association Supplement to K01HL125521.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alessandro Cavalcanti Lianza.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lianza, A.C., Rodrigues, A.C.T., Mercer-Rosa, L. et al. Right Ventricular Systolic Function After the Cone Procedure for Ebstein's Anomaly: Comparison Between Echocardiography and Cardiac Magnetic Resonance. Pediatr Cardiol 41, 985–995 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-020-02347-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-020-02347-6

Keywords

Navigation