Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Utility of 3D Printed Cardiac Models for Medical Student Education in Congenital Heart Disease: Across a Spectrum of Disease Severity

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Cardiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The most common modes of medical education for congenital heart disease (CHD) rely heavily on 2-dimensional imaging. Three-dimensional (3D) printing technology allows for the creation of physical cardiac models that can be used for teaching trainees. 3D printed cardiac models were created for the following lesions: pulmonic stenosis, atrial septal defect, tetralogy of Fallot, d-transposition of the great arteries, coarctation of the aorta, and hypoplastic left heart syndrome. Medical students participated in a workshop consisting of different teaching stations. At the 3D printed station, students completed a pre- and post-intervention survey assessing their knowledge of each cardiac lesion on a Likert scale. Students were asked to rank the educational benefit of each modality. Linear regression was utilized to assess the correlation of the mean increase in knowledge with increasing complexity of CHD based on the Aristotle Basic Complexity Level. 45 medical students attended the CHD workshop. Students’ knowledge significantly improved for every lesion (p < 0.001). A strong positive correlation was found between mean increase in knowledge and increasing complexity of CHD (R2 = 0.73, p < 0.05). The 3D printed models, pathology specimens and spoken explanation were found to be the most helpful modalities. Students “strongly agreed” the 3D printed models made them more confident in explaining congenital cardiac anatomy to others (mean = 4.23, ± 0.69), and that they recommend the use of 3D models for future educational sessions (mean = 4.40, ± 0.69). 3D printed cardiac models should be included in medical student education particularly for lesions that require a complex understanding of spatial relationships.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Reller MD et al (2008) Prevalence of congenital heart defects in metropolitan Atlanta, 1998–2005. J Pediatr 153(6):807–813

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. van der Linde D et al (2011) Birth prevalence of congenital heart disease worldwide: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 58(21):2241–2247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Marelli AJ et al (2014) Lifetime prevalence of congenital heart disease in the general population from 2000 to 2010. Circulation 130(9):749–756

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hoyek N et al (2009) Enhancement of mental rotation abilities and its effect on anatomy learning. Teach Learn Med 21(3):201–206

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gerrah R et al (2014) Adjustment of the surgical plan in repair of congenital heart disease: the power of cross-sectional imaging and three-dimensional visualization. Congenit Heart Dis 9(1):E31–E36

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Riesenkampff E et al (2009) The practical clinical value of three-dimensional models of complex congenitally malformed hearts. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 138(3):571–580

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Garcia J et al (2018) 3D printing materials and their use in medical education: a review of current technology and trends for the future. BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn 4(1):27–40

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Costello JP et al (2014) Utilizing three-dimensional printing technology to assess the feasibility of high-fidelity synthetic ventricular septal defect models for simulation in medical education. World J Pediatr Congenit Heart Surg 5(3):421–426

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. McMenamin PG et al (2014) The production of anatomical teaching resources using three-dimensional (3D) printing technology. Anat Sci Educ 7(6):479–486

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lim KH et al (2016) Use of 3D printed models in medical education: a randomized control trial comparing 3D prints versus cadaveric materials for learning external cardiac anatomy. Anat Sci Educ 9(3):213–221

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Soemantri D, McColl G, Dodds A (2018) Measuring medical students' reflection on their learning: modification and validation of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ). BMC Med Educ 18(1):274

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Sobral DT (2000) An appraisal of medical students' reflection-in-learning. Med Educ 34(3):182–187

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Farooqi KM, Mahmood F (2018) Innovations in preoperative planning: insights into another dimension using 3D printing for cardiac disease. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 32(4):1937–1945

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bramlet M et al (2017) Impact of three-dimensional printing on the study and treatment of congenital heart disease. Circ Res 120(6):904–907

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Farooqi KM et al (2016) Application of virtual three-dimensional models for simultaneous visualization of intracardiac anatomic relationships in double outlet right ventricle. Pediatr Cardiol 37(1):90–98

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Farooqi KM et al (2016) 3D printing to guide ventricular assist device placement in adults with congenital heart disease and heart failure. JACC Heart Fail 4(4):301–311

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Farooqi KM et al (2016) Use of a three dimensional printed cardiac model to assess suitability for biventricular repair. World J Pediatr Congenit Heart Surg 7(3):414–416

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Olivieri LJ et al (2016) "Just-in-time" simulation training using 3-D printed cardiac models after congenital cardiac surgery. World J Pediatr Congenit Heart Surg 7(2):164–168

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Loke YH et al (2017) Usage of 3D models of tetralogy of Fallot for medical education: impact on learning congenital heart disease. BMC Med Educ 17(1):54

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Biglino G et al (2015) 3D-manufactured patient-specific models of congenital heart defects for communication in clinical practice: feasibility and acceptability. BMJ Open 5(4):e007165

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Lacour-Gayet F et al (2004) The Aristotle score for congenital heart surgery. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Pediatr Card Surg Annu 7:185–191

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Cignoni P, Corsini M, Dellepiane M, Ganovelli F, Ranzuglia G (2008) MeshLab: an open-source mesh processing tool, in sixth eurographics Italian chapter conference, Italy, pp 129–136

  23. Su W et al (2018) Three-dimensional printing models in congenital heart disease education for medical students: a controlled comparative study. BMC Med Educ 18(1):178

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. White SC, et al (2018) Utility of three-dimensional models in resident education on simple and complex intracardiac congenital heart defects. Congenit Heart Dis 13(6):1045–1049

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Costello JP et al (2015) Incorporating three-dimensional printing into a simulation-based congenital heart disease and critical care training curriculum for resident physicians. Congenit Heart Dis 10(2):185–190

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Jones TW, Seckeler MD (2017) Use of 3D models of vascular rings and slings to improve resident education. Congenit Heart Dis 12(5):578–582

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Farooqi KM, et al (2015) Use of 3-dimensional printing to demonstrate complex intracardiac relationships in double-outlet right ventricle for surgical planning. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging 8(5):e003043.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Gosnell J et al (2016) Integration of computed tomography and three-dimensional echocardiography for hybrid three-dimensional printing in congenital heart disease. J Digit Imaging 29(6):665–669

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Yoo SJ, van Arsdell GS (2017) 3D printing in surgical management of double outlet right ventricle. Front Pediatr 5:289

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Bene KL, Bergus G (2014) When learners become teachers: a review of peer teaching in medical student education. Fam Med 46(10):783–787

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part by the Rachel Cooper Innovative Technologies Fund. We would like to thank the Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons, medical school class of 2021 for their participation in this study. This publication was supported in part by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health, through Grant Number UL1TR001873. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kanwal M. Farooqi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors have read and approved the manuscript. The other authors have nothing to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 750 kb)

Supplementary file2 (DOCX 880 kb)

Supplementary file3 (WMV 10194 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Smerling, J., Marboe, C.C., Lefkowitch, J.H. et al. Utility of 3D Printed Cardiac Models for Medical Student Education in Congenital Heart Disease: Across a Spectrum of Disease Severity. Pediatr Cardiol 40, 1258–1265 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-019-02146-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-019-02146-8

Navigation