Skip to main content
Log in

Usefulness of Electroanatomical Mapping with Contact Force Monitoring for Accessory Pathways Ablation in Pediatric Population

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Cardiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The current approach for catheter ablation (CA) of accessory pathways (AP) includes the use of standard catheters under fluoroscopic visualization. We hypothesize that use of contact force (CF) irrigated tip catheters might increase procedural safety in pediatric patients compared to standard irrigated tip catheters, by decreasing the number of radiofrequency (RF) pulses required to obtain AP elimination. Seventy-one pediatric patients (13.7 ± 2.5 years, 45 male) with ventricular pre-excitation were enrolled in the study. CA was performed with a standard irrigated tip catheter up to June 2013 in 41 patients (Group S) and with a CF sensing irrigated tip catheter later on in 30 patients (Group CF). In the Group CF, RF was applied with a minimal CF of 5 g; CF > 35 g was avoided. Group CF procedures required less fluoroscopy (6.8 ± 4.8 min), compared to Group S (12.2 ± 10.8 min, p = 0.007). The number of RF pulses was smaller in Group CF compared to Group S (2.5 ± 2.0 vs 5.5 ± 1.9, p < 0.01). The mean CF during the effective RF pulse was 18 ± 7.7 g, force–time integral was 1040.7 ± 955.9 gs, Ablation Index was 513.0 ± 214.2. The procedure was acutely successful in 70 patients; at 12 months follow-up 2 patients had AP recurrence, one for each group. No major complications were reported. The use of CF irrigated tip catheters was associated with a smaller number of RF pulses and less fluoroscopy, as compared to mapping and ablation with standard irrigated tip catheters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kugler JD, Danford DA, Deal BJ, Gillette PC, Perry JC, Silka MJ, Van Hare GF, Walsh EP (1994) Radiofrequency catheter ablation for tachyarrhythmias in children and adolescents. The Pediatric Electrophysiology Society. N Engl J Med 330:1481–1487

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Brugada J, Blom N, Sarquella-Brugada G, Blomstrom-Lundqvist C, Deanfield J, Janousek J, Abrams D, Bauersfeld U, Brugada R, Drago F, de Groot N, Happonen JM, Hebe J, Yen Ho S, Marijon E, Paul T, Pfammatter JP, Rosenthal E, European Heart Rhythm Association, Association for European Paediatric and Congenital Cardiology (2013) Pharmacological and non-pharmacological therapy for arrhythmias in the pediatric population: EHRA and AEPC-Arrhythmia Working Group joint consensus statement. Europace 15:1337–1382

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Van Hare GF, Javitz H, Carmelli D, Saul JP, Tanel RE, Fischbach PS, Kanter RJ, Schaffer M, Dunnigan A, Colan S, Serwer G, Pediatric Electrophysiology Society (2004) Prospective assessment after pediatric cardiac ablation: demographics, medical profiles, and initial outcomes. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 15:759–770

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Mizuno H, Vergara P, Maccabelli G, Trevisi N, Eng SC, Brombin C, Mazzone P, Della Bella P (2013) Contact force monitoring for cardiac mapping in patients with ventricular tachycardia. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 24:519–524

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Smeets JL, Ben-Haim SA, Rodriguez LM, Timmermans C, Wellens HJ (1998) New method for nonfluoroscopic endocardial mapping in humans: accuracy assessment and first clinical results. Circulation 97:2426–2432

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Padovani R, Bernardi G, Malisan MR, Vano E, Morocutti G, Fioretti PM (2001) Patient dose related to the complexity of interventional cardiology procedures. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 94:189–192

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. ICRU (2005) Patient dosimetry for X rays used in medical imaging. J ICRU 5:1–113

    Google Scholar 

  8. Rehani MM, Ciraj-Bjelac O, Vano E, Miller DL, Walsh S, Giordano BD, Persliden J (2010) ICRP Publication 117. Radiological protection in fluoroscopically guided procedures performed outside the imaging department. Ann ICRP 40:1–102

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gulletta S, Tsiachris D, Della Bella P (2014) Catheter ablation of an anteroseptal accessory pathway guided by contact force monitoring technology and precise electroanatomical mapping. Europace 16:825

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lin K, Chen S, Lin Y, Chang K (2006) Irrigated and cooledtip radiofrequency catheter ablation. In: Huang S, Wood M (eds) Catheter ablation of cardiac arrhythmias. WB Saunders, Philadelphia, pp 35–48

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Yildirim I, Karagoz T, Ertugrul I, Karagoz AH, Ozer S (2013) Efficacy and safety of cryoablation of parahissian accessory pathways in children: a single institution study. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 36:1495–1502

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kirsh JA, Gross GJ, O’Connor S, Hamilton RM, Cryocath International Patient Registry (2005) Transcatheter cryoablation of tachyarrhythmias in children: initial experience from an international registry. J Am Coll Cardiol 45:133–136

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kriebel T, Broistedt C, Kroll M, Sigler M, Paul T (2005) Efficacy and safety of cryoenergy in the ablation of atrioventricular reentrant tachycardia substrates in children and adolescents. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 16:960–966

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kuck KH, Reddy VY, Schmidt B, Natale A, Neuzil P, Saoudi N, Kautzner J, Herrera C, Hindricks G, Jais P, Nakagawa H, Lambert H, Shah DC (2012) A novel radiofrequency ablation catheter using contact force sensing: TOCCATA study. Heart Rhythm 9:18–23

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Perna F, Heist EK, Danik SB, Barrett CD, Ruskin JN, Mansour M (2011) Assessment of the catheter tip contact force resulting in cardiac perforation in the swine atria using the force sensing technology. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol 4:218–224

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Yamane T, Jais P, Shah DC, Hocini M, Peng JT, Deisenhofer I, Clementy J, Haissaguerre M (2000) Efficacy and safety of an irrigated-tip catheter for the ablation of accessory pathways resistant to conventional radiofrequency ablation. Circulation 102:2565–2568

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Natale A, Reddy VY, Monir G, Wilber DJ, Lindsay BD, McElderry HT, Kantipudi C, Mansour MC, Melby DP, Packer DL, Nakagawa H, Zhang B, Stagg RB, Boo LM, Marchlinski FE (2014) Paroxysmal AF catheter ablation with a contact force sensing catheter: results of the prospective, multicenter SMART-AF trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 64:647–656

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Reddy VY, Shah D, Kautzner J, Schmidt B, Saoudi N, Herrera C, Jais P, Hindricks G, Peichl P, Yulzari A, Lambert H, Neuzil P, Natale A, Kuck KH (2012) The relationship between contact force and clinical outcome during radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in the TOCCATA study. Heart Rhythm 9:1789–1795

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Das M, Loveday JJ, Wynn GJ, Gomes S, Saeed Y, Bonnett LJ, Waktare JEP, Todd DM, Hall MCS, Snowdon RL, Modi S, Gupta D (2017) Ablation index, a novel marker of ablation lesion quality: prediction of pulmonary vein reconnection at repeat electrophysiology study and regional differences in target values. Europace 19:775–783

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank the engineers Claudio Albertini and Emanuele Merola for the procedure support and data collection.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

SG: concept/design, data collection, critical revision of article, and approval of article. PV: concept/design, statistics, drafting article. LG: data collection, approval of article. GD: data collection, approval of article. AR: approval of article. CMB: data collection, approval of article. NT: approval of article. PDB: critical revision of article and approval of article.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Simone Gulletta.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Dr. Pasquale Vergara is a consultant for Biosense Webster. Dr. Della Bella is a consultant for St. Jude Medical and has received honoraria for lectures from Biosense Webster, St. Jude Medical, and Biotronik. The other authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Research Involving Human Participants and/or Animals

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Parents or their legal representatives provided written informed consent in accordance with local guidelines.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gulletta, S., Vergara, P., Gigli, L. et al. Usefulness of Electroanatomical Mapping with Contact Force Monitoring for Accessory Pathways Ablation in Pediatric Population. Pediatr Cardiol 40, 713–718 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-019-02051-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-019-02051-0

Keywords

Navigation