Abstract
The complexity and potential biases involved in decision making have long been recognised and examined in both the aviation and business industries. More recently, the medical community have started to explore this concept and its particular importance in our field. Paediatric cardiology is a rapidly expanding field and for many of the conditions we treat, there is limited evidence available to support our decision-making. Variability exists within decision-making in paediatric cardiology and this may influence outcomes. There are no validated tools available to support and examine consistent decision-making for various treatment strategies in children with congenital heart disease in a multidisciplinary cardiology and cardiothoracic institution. Our primary objective was to analyse the complexity of decision-making for children with cardiac conditions in the context of our joint cardiology and cardiothoracic conference (JCC). Two paediatric cardiologists acted as investigators by observing the weekly joint cardiology–cardiothoracic surgery conference and prospectively evaluating the degree of complexity of decision-making in the management of 107 sequential children with congenital heart disease discussed. Additionally, the group consensus on the same patients was prospectively assessed to compare this to the independent observers. Of 107 consecutive children discussed at our JCC conference 32 (27%) went on to receive surgical intervention, 20 (17%) underwent catheterisation and 65 (56%) received medical treatment. There were 53 (50%) cases rated as simple by one senior observer, while 54 (50%) were rated as complex to some degree. There was high inter-observer agreement with a Krippendorff’s alpha of ≥ 0.8 between 2 observers and between 2 observers and the group consensus as a whole for grading of the complexity of decision-making. Different decisions were occasionally made on patients with the same data set. Discussions revisiting the same patient, in complex cases, resulted in different management decisions being reached in this series. Anchoring of decision-making was witnessed in certain cases. Potential application of decision making algorithms is discussed in making decisions in paediatric cardiology patients. Decision-making in our institution’s joint cardiology–cardiothoracic conference proved to be complex in approximately half of our patients. Inconsistency in decision-making for patients with the same diagnosis, and different decisions made for the same complex patient at different time points confounds the reliability of the decision-making process. These novel data highlight the absence of evidence-based medicine for many decisions, occasional lack of consistency and the impact of anchoring, heuristics and other biases in complex cases. Validated decision-making algorithms may assist in providing consistency to decision-making in this setting.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ryan A, Duignan S, Kenny D, McMahon CJ (2018) Decision making in paediatric cardiology. Are we prone to heuristics, biases and traps? Pediatr Cardiol 39(1):160–167
Hammond JS, Keeney RL, Raiffa H (1998) The hidden traps in decision making. Harv Bus Rev 76:47–58
Hammond JS, Keeney RL, Raiffa H (1999) Smart choices: a practical guide to making better decisions. Harvard Business School Press, Cambridge, MA
Tversky A, Kahneman D (1974) Judgments under uncertainty: heuristics and biases. Science 185(4157):1124–1131
Kahneman D, Frederick S (2005) A model of heuristic judgment. In: Holyoak KJ, Morrison RG (eds) The Cambridge handbook of thinking and reasoning. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 267–293
Baskin E, Novemsky N, Dhar R (2015) Framing choice as an opportunity encourages situational attribution. In: Diehl K, Yoon C (eds) NA-advances in consumer research, vol 43. Association for Consumer Research, Duluth, pp 80–94
Allen SW, Gauvreau K, Bloom BT, Jenkins K (2003) Evidence-based referral results in significantly reduced mortality after congenital heart surgery. Pediatrics 112(1 Pt 1):24–28
Tichenor PJ, Donohoe GA, Olien CN (1970) Mass media flow and differential growth in knowledge. Public Opin Q 34:159–170
National Institute for Cardiovascular Outcomes Research. https://nicor4.nicor.org.uk/CHD/an_paeds.nsf/WSummaryYears?openview&RestrictToCategory=2015&start=1&count=500. Accessed 5 Jan 2018
Simmonds J, Murchan H, James A, Crispino G, O’Brien J, Crumlish K, Franklin O, Fenton M, Burch M, McMahon CJ (2016) Outcome of shared care for paediatric cardiac transplantation between two nations with different healthcare systems. J Heart Lung Transplant 34(6):806–814
Bruner J (1966) Toward a theory of instruction. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Feltes TF, Bacha E, Beekman RH 3rd, Cheatham JP, Feinstein JA, Gomes AS (2011) Indications for cardiac catheterization and intervention in pediatric cardiac disease: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 123:2607–2652
Sackett DL. Rosenberg WMC, Gray JA, Haynes RB, Richardson WS (1996) Evidence-based medicine: what it is and what it isn’t. BMJ 312:71–72
Ellenberg J (2006) How not to be wrong. Penguin Press, London
Greenhalgh T (2013) Uncertainty and clinical method. In: Somers L, Launer J (eds) Clinical uncertainty in primary care: the challenge of collaborative engagement. Springer, New York
Engebretsen E, Heggen K, Wieringa S, Greenhalgh T (2016) Uncertainty and objectivity in clinical decision making: a clinical case in emergency medicine. Med Health Care Philos 19:595–603
Lonergan B (1992) Insight: a study of human understanding. Volume 3 of the collected Works of Bernard Lonergan. University of Toronto Press, Toronto
Luo J, Yu R (2015) Follow the heart or the head? The interactive influence model of emotion and cognition. Front Psychol 6:573
Hunink MGM, Glasziou PP, Siegel JE, Weeks JC, Pliskin JS, Elstein AS, Weinstein MC (2001) Decision making in health and medicine: integrating evidence and values. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Acknowledgements
We wish to acknowledge Professor Nathan Novemsky, Professor of Marketing and Psychology, Yale School of Behavioural Management, New Haven, Connecticut, U.S.A. for his original encouragement to study this area. We are also grateful to Mr. Andrew Pendred for generating the figures. We are grateful to our colleagues for allowing us study their decision-making process in the ‘JCC’.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest.
Ethical Approval
This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Duignan, S., Ryan, A., O’Keeffe, D. et al. Prospective Analysis of Decision Making During Joint Cardiology Cardiothoracic Conference in Treatment of 107 Consecutive Children with Congenital Heart Disease. Pediatr Cardiol 39, 1330–1338 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-018-1899-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-018-1899-3