Advertisement

Pediatric Cardiology

, Volume 39, Issue 6, pp 1181–1187 | Cite as

Impact of Fetal Somatic Growth on Pulmonary Valve Annulus Z-Scores During Gestation and Through Birth in Patients with Tetralogy of Fallot

  • Alisa Arunamata
  • Sowmya Balasubramanian
  • Rajesh Punn
  • Amy Quirin
  • Theresa A. Tacy
Original Article

Abstract

Previous studies have suggested reduced pulmonary valve annulus (PVA) growth and progression of pulmonary outflow obstruction in fetuses with tetralogy of Fallot (TOF). The goals of this study were to (1) investigate the trajectory of PVA growth in utero, and (2) compare two methods of z-score determination for fetal and postnatal PVA size by echocardiography in order to improve prenatal counseling for patients with TOF. Fetal echocardiograms (FE) at a single institution with a diagnosis of TOF between 8/2008 and 12/2015 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients included had at least 2 FEs and 1 immediate postnatal echocardiogram (TTE). Fetal and postnatal demographic, clinical, and echocardiographic data were collected. Fetal body surface area (BSA) was calculated by estimating fetal weight and height; z-scores were determined based on fetal gestational age (GA) and BSA for both FEs and TTEs. Fetal PVA z-scores by GA or BSA were then compared to postnatal PVA z-scores by BSA. Twenty-two patients with 44 FEs and 22 TTEs were included. GA at the first FE was 23 weeks ± 3.4 and 32 weeks ± 3.1 at the second FE. There was no difference in PVA z-scores (by BSA) between the first and second FE (p = 0.34), but a decrease in PVA z-scores (by BSA) between the second FE and TTE (− 1.6 ± 0.5 vs. − 2.0 ± 0.7; p = 0.01). Repeat comparison with fetal PVA z-scores indexed to GA revealed no difference in z-scores between the first and second FE, but an increase in PVA z-scores between the second FE (by GA) and TTE (by BSA) (− 4.1 ± 1.0 vs. − 2.0 ± 0.7; p < 0.0001). The rate of PVA growth between the two FEs (23 µm/day ± 9.8) and between the second FE and TTE (28 µm/day ± 42) remained comparable (p = 0.57); however, the rate of BSA increase was greater in later gestation (9 cm2/day ± 3 vs. 20 cm2/day ± 11; p = 0.001). In patients with TOF, the rate of PVA growth appears to remain consistent through gestation; however, somatic growth rate increases in late gestation. Fetal PVA z-scores indexed to GA are thus inaccurate in predicting postnatal PVA z-scores typically indexed to BSA. This observation should be considered during prenatal consultation and delivery planning.

Keywords

Fetal cardiology Congenital heart disease Tetralogy of Fallot Fetal ultrasound Fetal somatic growth Echocardiography 

Abbreviations

BSA

Body surface area

FE

Fetal echocardiogram

GA

Gestational age

PS

Pulmonary stenosis

PVA

Pulmonary valve annulus

TOF

Tetralogy of Fallot

TTE

Transthoracic echocardiogram

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This article does not contain any studies with animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed Consent

This is a retrospective data review study, hence need for consent was waived from the Institutional Review Board. Permission was granted for this retrospective data review.

References

  1. 1.
    Bailliard F, Anderson RH (2009) Tetralogy of Fallot. Orphanet J Rare Dis 4:2CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Galindo A, Mendoza A, Arbues J, Grañeras A, Escribano D, Nieto O (2009) Conotruncal anomalies in fetal life: accuracy of diagnosis, associated defects and outcome. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 146:55–60CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Poon LC, Huggon IC, Zidere V, Allan LD (2007) Tetralogy of Fallot in the fetus in the current era. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 29:625–627CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hornberger LK, Sanders SP, Sahn DJ, Rice MJ, Spevak PJ, Benacerraf BR, McDonald RW, Colan SD (1995) In utero pulmonary artery and aortic growth and potential for progression of pulmonary outflow tract obstruction in tetralogy of Fallot. J Am Coll Cardiol 25:739–745CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Allan LD, Sharland GK (1992) Prognosis in fetal tetralogy of Fallot. Pediatr Cardiol 13:1–4PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Rice MJ, McDonald RW, Reller MD (1993) Progressive pulmonary stenosis in the fetus: two case reports. Am J Perinatol 10:424–427CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Escribano D, Herraiz I, Granados M, Arbues J, Mendoza A, Galindo A (2011) Tetralogy of Fallot: prediction of outcome in the mid-second trimester of pregnancy. Prenat Diagn 31:1126–1133PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sluysmans T, Colan SD (2009) Structural measurements and adjustment for growth, Chap. 5. In: Lai WW, Cohen MS, Geva T, Mertens L (eds) Echocardiography in pediatric and congenital heart disease. Wiley-Blackwell, West SussexGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Colan SD (2009) Normal echocardiographic values for cardiovascular structures. In: Lai WW, Cohen MS, Geva T, Mertens L (eds) Echocardiography in pediatric and congenital heart disease. Wiley-Blackwell, West Sussex, pp 765–785Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jonas RA (2009) Early primary repair of tetralogy of Fallot. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Pediatr Card Surg Annu 1:39–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Stewart RD, Backer CL, Young L, Mavroudis C (2005) Tetralogy of Fallot: results of a pulmonary valve-sparing strategy. Ann Thorac Surg 80:1431–1439CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Doubilet PM (2014) Ultrasound evaluation of the first trimester. Radiol Clin North Am 52:1191–1199CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Robinson HP, Fleming JE (1975) A critical evaluation of sonar ‘‘crown–rump length’’ measurements. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 82:702–710CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hadlock FP, Harrist RB, Carpenter RJ, Deter RL, Park SK (1984) Sonographic estimation of fetal weight: the value of femur length in addition to head and abdomen measurements. Radiology 150:535–540CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Aviram A, Yogev Y, Ashwal E, Hiersch L, Hadar E, Gabbay-Benziv R (2017) Prediction of large for gestational age by various sonographic fetal weight estimation formulas-which should we use? J Perinatol 37:513–517CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Vintzileos AM, Campbell WA, Neckles S, Pike CL, Nochimson DJ (1984) The ultrasound femur length as a predictor of fetal length. Obstet Gynecol 64:779–782PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Haycock GB, Schwartz GJ, Wisotsky DH (1978) Geometric method for measuring body surface area: a height-weight formula validated in infants, children, and adults. J Pediatr 93:62–66CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sharland GK, Allan LD (1992) Normal fetal cardiac measurements derived by cross-sectional echocardiography. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2:175–181CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Achiron R, Golan-Porat N, Gabbay U, Rotstein Z, Heggesh J, Mashiach S, Lipitz S (1998) In utero ultrasonographic measurements of fetal aortic and pulmonary artery diameters during the first half of gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 11:180–184CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Brenner WE, Edelman DA, Hendricks CH (1976) A standard of fetal growth for the United States of America. Am J Obstet Gynecol 126:555–564CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Nakashima K, Itatani K, Oka N, Kitamura T, Horai T, Hari Y, Miyaji K (2014) Pulmonary annulus growth after the modified Blalock-Taussig shunt in tetralogy of Fallot. Ann Thorac Surg 98:934–940CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Department of PediatricsStanford University School of MedicinePalo AltoUSA

Personalised recommendations