Validation of Right Atrial Area as a Measure of Right Atrial Size and Normal Values of in Healthy Pediatric Population by Two-Dimensional Echocardiography
- 59 Downloads
Right atrial (RA) size is a prognostic indicator for heart failure and cardiovascular death in adults. Data regarding use of RA area (RAA) by two-dimensional echocardiography as a surrogate for RA size and allometric modeling to define appropriate indexing of the RAA are lacking. Our objective was to validate RAA as a reliable measure of RA size and to define normal reference values by transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) in a large population of healthy children and develop Z-scores using a validated allometric model for indexing RAA independent of age, sex, and body size. Agreement between RAA and volume by 2D, 3D TTE, and MRI was assessed. RAA not volume by 2D TTE is an excellent surrogate for RA size. RAA/BSA1 has an inverse correlation with BSA with a residual relationship to BSA (r = − 0.54, p < 0.0001). The allometric exponent (AE) derived for the entire cohort (0.85) also fails to eliminate the residual relationship. The entire cohort divided into two groups with a BSA cut-off of 1 m2 to provide the best-fit allometric model (r = 0). The AE by least square regression analysis for each group is 0.95 and 0.88 for BSA < 1 m2 and > 1 m2, respectively, and was validated against an independent sample. The mean indexed RAA ± SD for BSA ≤ 1 m2 and > 1 m2 is 9.7 ± 1.3 cm2 and 8.7 ± 1.3 cm2, respectively, and was used to derive Z-scores. RAA by 2D TTE is superior to 2D or 3D echocardiography-derived RA volume as a measure of RA size using CMR as the reference standard. RAA when indexed to BSA1, decreases as body size increases. The best-fit allometric modeling is used to create Z scores. RAA/BSA0.95 for BSA < 1 m2 and RAA/BSA0.88 for those with BSA > 1 m2 can be used to derive Z scores.
KeywordsRight atrial area Pediatrics Z scores Allometric
The authors would like to acknowledge Erika Pedri RDCS and Rosalie Castaldo RDCS for echocardiographic measurements.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
- 1.Kassen RE, Humpl T, Friedberg MK (2013) Prognostic significance of 2-dimensional, M-mode, and Doppler echo indices of right ventricular function in children with pulmonary arterial hypertension. Am J Cardiol 165:1024–1031Google Scholar
- 9.Rudski LG, Lai WW, Afilalo J, Hua L, Handschumacher MD, Chandrasekaran K, Solomon SD, Louie EK, Schiller NB (2010) Guidelines for the echocardiographic assessment of the right heart in adults: a report from the American Society of Echocardiography endorsed by the European Association of Echocardiography, a registered branch of the European Society of Cardiology, and the Canadian Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 23:685–713 (quiz 786)CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 10.Sarikouch S, Koerperich H, Boethig D, Peters B, Lotz J, Gutberlet M, Beerbaum P, Kuehne T (2011) Reference values for atrial size and function in children and young adults by cardiac MR: a study of the german competence network congenital heart defects. J Magn Reson Imaging 33:1028–1039. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.22521 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 12.Aune E, Baekkevar M, Roislien J, Rodevand O, Otterstad JE (2009) Normal reference ranges for left and right atrial volumen indexes and ejection fractions obtained with real-time three-dimensional echocardiography. Eur J Echocardiogr 10:738–744. https://doi.org/10.1093/ejechocard/jep054 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 24.Kebed K, Kruse E, Addetia K, Ciszek B, Thykattil M, Guile B et al (2017) Atrial-focused views improve the accuracy of two-dimensional echocardiographic measurements of the left and right atrial volumes: a contribution to the increase in normal values in the guidelines update. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 33:209–218CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar