Advertisement

Pediatric Cardiology

, Volume 39, Issue 4, pp 674–681 | Cite as

Post-operative Catheterization Interventions at the Site of Surgery: An Application of the CRISP Scoring System

  • Katie Mowers
  • Toby Rockefeller
  • David Balzer
  • Ramzi Nicolas
  • Shabana Shahanavaz
Original Article

Abstract

Catheter-based interventions in the early post-operative period are performed with caution due to concerns for increased procedural risk, particularly across fresh suture lines. The recently published CRISP scoring system provides prospective risk stratification based on pre-procedural criterion. In an effort to refine the assessment of risk in patients undergoing post-operative catheter-based interventions, the predicted risk of an adverse event based on CRISP scores was compared to actual adverse event rates. A single-center, retrospective review of patients undergoing catheterization interventions within 6 weeks of cardiac surgery was conducted between Jan 2004 and Dec 2014. Patients who underwent dilation interventions across fresh suture lines (group 1) were compared to patients who underwent interventional procedures at other sites (group 2), and a CRISP score was calculated for all patients. Patients receiving only surveillance biopsies were excluded. Sixty-eight patients underwent 100 interventional procedures. Group 1 was composed of 44 patients receiving 64 interventions, while group 2 had 24 patients who underwent 36 interventions. Group 1 was comprised significantly more single ventricles and patients were smaller/younger. Group 1 had a significantly higher median CRISP score, but both groups were within Category 4. The rates of adverse events were similar between groups and comparable to predicted rates with the CRISP scoring system. Catheter-based interventions in the early post-operative period can be performed with no significant increase in the risk of serious adverse events when intervening across fresh suture lines. The CRISP scoring system can be a valuable tool in pre-procedural counseling of high-risk post-operative patients.

Keywords

COMP-complications Pediatric Catheterization Intervention 

Abbreviations

EPOCIC

Early post-operative cardiac interventional catheterization

CRISP

Catheterization Risk in Pediatrics Score

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

None of the authors have any relevant financial relationships to disclose.

References

  1. 1.
    Mazwi ML, Brown DW, Marshall AC, Pigula FA, Lausen PC, Polito A, Wypij D, Costello JM (2013) Unplanned reinterventions are associated with postoperative mortality in neonates with critical congenital heart disease. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 145:671–677CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Asoh K, Hickey E, Dorostkar PC, Chaturvedi R, van Arsdell G, Humpl T, Benson LN (2009) Outcomes of emergent cardiac catheterization following pediatric cardiac surgery. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 73:933–940CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rosales AM, Lock JE, Perry SB, Geggel RL (2002) Interventional catheterization management of perioperative peripheral pulmonary stenosis: balloon angioplasty or endovascular stenting. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 56:272–277CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nicholson GT, Kim DW, Vincent RN, Kogon BE, Miller BE, Petit CJ (2014) Cardiac catheterization in the early post-operative period after congenital cardiac surgery. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 7:1437–1443CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Zahn EM, Bodrolet NC, Nykanen DG, Ojito J, Hannan RL, Burke RP (2004) Interventional catheterization performed in the early postoperative period after congenital heart surgery in children. J Am Coll Cardiol 43:1264–1269CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nykanen DG, Zahn EM (2005) Transcatheter techniques in the management of perioperative vascular obstruction. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 66:573–579CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Booth KL, Roth SJ, Perry SB, del Nido PJ, Wessel DL, Laussen PC (2002) Cardiac catheterization of patients supported by extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. J Am Coll Cardiol 40:1681–1686CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Walayat M, McArthur K, Lilley S, Wilson N (2003) Feasibility and safety of immediate perioperative implantation of intravascular stents in cavopulmonary pathways. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 60:94–98CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kogon B, Villari C, Shah N, Kirshbom P, Kanter K, Kim D, Raviele A, Vincent R (2007) Occlusion of the modified Blalock-Taussig shunt: unique methods of treatment and review of catheter-based intervention. Congen Heart Dis 2:85–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Morchi GS, Pietra B, Boucek MM, Chan K-C (2008) Interventional cardiac catheterization procedures in pediatric cardiac transplant patients: transplant surgery is not the end of the road. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 72:831–836CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bhole V, Wright JGC, De Givoanni JV, Dhillon R, Miller PA, Desai T, Chikermane A, Jones T, Barron DJ, Brawn WJ, Stumper O (2011) Transcatheter interventions in the early postoperative period after the Fontan procedure. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 77:92–98CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nicholson G et al. (2015) Transcatheter interventions across fresh suture lines in infants and children: an 8-year experience. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 86:271–277Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nykanen DG, Forbes TJ, Du E, Divekar AA, Reeves JH, Hagler DJ, Fagan TE, Pedra CA, Fleming GA, Khan DM, Javois AJ, Gruenstein DH, Qureshi SA, Moore PM, Wax DH (2015) CRISP: Catheterization RISk Score for pediatrics: a report from the Congenital Cardiac Interventional Study Consortium (CCISC). Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 87:302–309CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Bergersen L, Marshall A, Gauvreau K, Beekman R, Hirsch R, Foerster S et al (2010) Adverse event rates in congenital cardiac catheterization: a multi-center experience. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 75:389–400PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Vincent RN, Moore J, Beekman RH, Benson L, Bergersen L, Holzer R et al (2016) Procedural characteristics and adverse events in diagnostic and interventional catheterisations in paediatric and adult CHD: initial report from the IMPACT Registry. Cardiol Young 26:70–78CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ho C, Krovetz L, Rowe R (1972) Major complications of cardiac catheterization and angiography in infants and children. Johns Hopkins Med J 131:247–258PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cassidy SC, Schmidt KG, Van Hare GF, Stanger P, Teitel DF (1992) Complications of pediatric cardiac catheterization: a 3-year study. J Am Coll Cardiol 19:1285–1293CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Vitiello R, McCrindle BW, Nykanen D, Freedom RM, Benson LN (1998) Complications associated with pediatric cardiac catheterization. J Am Coll Cardiol 32:1433–1440CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bergesen L, Gauvreau K, Foerster SR et al (2011) Catheterization for congenital heart disease adjustment for risk method (CHARM). JACC: Cardiovascular Interv 4(9):1037–1046Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Jayaram N, Beekman RH, Benson L et al (2015) Adjusting for risk associated with pediatric and congenital cardiac catheterization: a report from the NCDR IMPACT registry. Circulation 132(20):1863–1870PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Katie Mowers
    • 1
  • Toby Rockefeller
    • 1
  • David Balzer
    • 1
  • Ramzi Nicolas
    • 1
  • Shabana Shahanavaz
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Cardiology, Department of PediatricsWashington University School of Medicine/St. Louis Children’s HospitalSaint LouisUSA

Personalised recommendations