Advertisement

Pediatric Cardiology

, Volume 37, Issue 8, pp 1429–1435 | Cite as

Radiation Exposure by Three-Dimensional Rotational Angiography (3DRA) During Trans-catheter Melody Pulmonary Valve Procedures (TMPV) in a Pediatric Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory

  • Hoang H. NguyenEmail author
  • David T. Balzer
  • Joshua J. Murphy
  • Ramzi Nicolas
  • Shabana Shahanavaz
Original Article

Abstract

This retrospective study aims to evaluate radiation exposure by three-dimensional rotational angiography (3DRA) during trans-catheter Melody pulmonary valve (TMPV) procedures. 3DRA has been reported to have added value in the management of complex congenital heart disease aiding in the performance of interventional procedures albeit with concerns of higher radiation exposure. We test the hypothesis that 3DRA does not cause additional radiation exposure during TMPV procedures. We analyzed all 81 TMPV procedures performed at St. Louis Children’s Hospital, MO, USA, from January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2014. Dose-area product (DAP), DAP indexed to body weight (DAP/BW), fluoroscopy time (FT), and weight–fluoroscopy time product of each procedure were recorded. We reviewed each procedure’s images to determine whether additional interventions were performed (e.g., pulmonary artery angioplasty or treatment of conduit pseudo-aneurysm). 3DRA was used in 36 % of the procedures. 3DRA group had a higher number of additional procedures performed. The 3DRA group did not differ from the non-3DRA group in DAP, DAP/BW, and weight–fluoroscopy time product. 3DRA does not cause greater radiation exposure during TMPV procedures.

Keywords

Tetralogy of Fallot Congenital heart disease Right ventricular outflow tract dysfunction 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Dr. Toby Rockefeller for his critical reading of this manuscript.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

Dr. Balzer is a proctor for Medtronic. The remaining authors have no financial relationships relevant to this article to disclose. The authors have indicated they have no potential conflicts of interest to disclose.

References

  1. 1.
    Johnson JN, Hornik CP, Li JS, Benjamin DK, Yoshizumi TT, Reiman RE, Frush DP, Hill KD (2014) Cumulative radiation exposure and cancer risk estimation in children with heart disease. Circulation 130:161–167CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bacher K, Bogaert E, Lapere R, De Wolf D, Thierens H (2005) Patient-specific dose and radiation risk estimation in pediatric cardiac catheterization. Circulation 111:83–89CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ghelani SJ, Glatz AC, Stuthi D, Leahy R, Hirsch R, Armsby LB, Trucco SM, Holzer RJ, Bergersen L (2014) Radiation dose benchmarks during cardiac catheterization for congenital heart disease in the United States. J Am Coll Cardiol Interv 7:1060–1069CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hijazi ZM, Awad SM (2008) Pediatric cardiac interventions. J Am Coll Cardiol Interv 1:603–611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Glatz AC, Zhu X, Gillespie J, Hanna BD, Rome JJ (2010) Use of angiographic CT imaging in the cardiac catheterization laboratory for congenital heart disease. J Am Coll Cardiol Imaging 3:1149–1157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Glockler M, Koch A, Greim V, Shabaiek A, Ruffer A, Cesnjevar R, Achenbach S, Dittrich S (2011) The value of flat-detector computed tomography during catheterization of congenital heart disease. Eur Radiol 21:2511–2520CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Glockler M, Halbfass J, Koch A, Achenbach S, Dittrich S (2013) Multimodality 3D-roadmap for cardiovascular interventions in congenital heart disease: a single-center, retrospective analysis of 78 cases. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 82:436–442CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fagan T, Kay J, Carroll J, Neubauer A (2012) 3-D guidance of complex pulmonary artery stent placement using reconstructed rotational angiography with live overlay. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 79:414–421CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Boothroyd A, McDonald E, Moores BM, Sluming V, Carty H (1997) Radiation exposure to children during cardiac catheterization. Br J Radiol 70:180–185CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rassow J, Schmaltz AA, Heintrich F, Steffer C (2000) Effective doses to patients from paediatric cardiac catheterization. Br J Radiol 73:172–183CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Martinez LC, Vano E, Gutierrez F, Rodriguez C, Gilarranz R, Manzanas MJ (2007) Patient doses from fluoroscopically guided cardiac procedures in pediatrics. Phys Med Biol 52:4749–4759CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ubeda C, Vano E, Miranda P, Leyton F (2012) Pilot program on patient dosimetry in pediatric interventional cardiology in Chile. Med Phys 39:2424–2430CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chida K, Ohno T, Takegawa M, Yuuki H, Nakada M, Takahashi S, Zuguchi M (2010) Radiation doses to the pediatric cardiac catheterization and intervention patient. Am J Roent 195:1175–1179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Glatz AC, Patel A, Zhu X, Dori Y, Hanna BD, Gillespie MJ, Rome JJ (2014) Patient radiation exposure in a modern, large-volume, pediatric cardiac catheterization laboratory. Pediatr Cardiol 35:870–878CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Verghese GR, McElhinney DB, Strauss KJ, Bergensen L (2012) Characterization of radiation exposure and effect of a radiation monitoring policy in a large volume pediatric cardiac catheterization lab. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 79:294–301CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Reinke G, Halbfass J, Dittrich S, Banckwitz R, Kohler C, Achenbach S, Rompel O, Glocker M (2013) Three-dimensional rotational angiography in congenital heart disease: estimation of radiation exposure. Open J Radiol 3:124–129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Manica JLL, Borges MS, de Medeiros RF, dos Santos Fischer L, Broetto G, Rossi Filho RI (2014) A comparison of radiation dose between standard and 3D angiography in congenital heart disease. Arq Bras Cardiol 103:131–137PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Corredoira E, Vano E, Ubeda C, Gutierrez-Larraya F (2015) Patient doses in pediatric interventional cardiology: impact of 3D rotational angiography. J Radiol Prot 35:179–195CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Peters M, Krings G, Koster M, Molenschot M, Freund MW, Breur JMPJ (2015) Effective radiation dosage of three-dimensional rotational angiography in children. Europace 17:611–616CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kapins CEB, Coutinho RB, Barbosa FB, Silva CMC, Lima VC, Carvalho AC (2010) Use of 3D rotational angiography in congenital heart disease: experience with 53 patients. Rev Bras Cardiol Invasiva 18:199–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Berman DP, Khan DM, Gutierrez Y, Zahn EM (2012) The use of three-dimensional rotational angiography to assess the pulmonary circulation following cavo-pulmonary connection in patients with single ventricle. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 80:922–930CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kobayashi D, Meadows J, Forbes TJ, Moore P, Javois AJ, Pedra CA, Du W, Gruenstein DH, Wax DF, Hill JA, Graziano JN, Fagan TE, Alvarez WM, Nykanen DG, Divekar AA (2014) Standardizing radiation dose reporting in the pediatric cardiac catheterization laboratory: a multicenter study by the CCISC (Congenital Cardiovascular Interventional Study Consortium). Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 84:785–793CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hoang H. Nguyen
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • David T. Balzer
    • 1
  • Joshua J. Murphy
    • 1
    • 2
  • Ramzi Nicolas
    • 1
  • Shabana Shahanavaz
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Cardiology, Department of PediatricsWashington University in St. Louis School of MedicineSt. LouisUSA
  2. 2.Division of Cardiology, Department of PediatricsRush University Medical CollegeChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations