Advertisement

Pediatric Cardiology

, Volume 37, Issue 2, pp 271–277 | Cite as

Vasoactive Inotropic Score (VIS) as Biomarker of Short-Term Outcomes in Adolescents after Cardiothoracic Surgery

  • Richard U. GarciaEmail author
  • Henry L. WaltersIII
  • Ralph E. Delius
  • Sanjeev Aggarwal
Original Article

Abstract

Our aim was to evaluate the Vasoactive Inotropic Score (VIS) as a prognostic marker in adolescents following surgery for congenital heart disease. This single-center retrospective chart review included patients 10–18 years of age, who underwent cardiac surgery from 2009 to 2014. Hourly VIS was calculated for the initial 48 postoperative hours using standard formulae and incorporating doses of six pressors. The composite adverse outcome was defined as any one of death, resuscitation or mechanical support, arrhythmia, infection requiring antibacterial therapy, acute kidney injury or neurologic injury. Surgeries were risk-stratified by the type of surgical repair using the validated STAT score. Statistical analysis (SPSS 19.0) included Mann–Whitney U test, Chi-square test, ROC curves, and binary regression analysis. Our cohort (n = 149) had a mean (SD) age of 13.9 (2.4) years and included 97 (65.1 %) males. Maximal VIS at 24 and 48 h following surgery was significantly higher in subjects (n = 27) who suffered an adverse outcome. Subjects with adverse outcome had longer bypass and cross-clamp times, durations of stay in the hospital, and a higher rate of acute kidney injury, compared to those (n = 122) without postoperative adverse outcomes. The area under the ROC for maximum VIS at 24–48 h after surgery was 0.76, with sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values with 95 % CI of 67 (48–82) %, 74 (70–77) %, and 36 (26–44) % and 91 (86–95) %, respectively, at a cutoff >4.75. On binary logistic regression, maximum VIS on second postoperative day remained significantly associated with adverse outcome (OR 1.35; 95 % CI> 1.12–1.64, p = 0.002). Maximal VIS at 24 and 48 h correlated significantly with length of stay and time to extubation. Maximal VIS on the second postoperative day predicts adverse outcome in adolescents following cardiac surgery. This simple yet robust prognostic indicator may aid in risk stratification and targeted interventions in this population.

Keywords

Vasoactive Inotropic Score Postoperative outcomes Congenital heart disease Adolescents 

Notes

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

No conflict of interest, grants, or other financial support.

References

  1. 1.
    Alyn IB, Baker LK (1992) Cardiovascular anatomy and physiology of the fetus, neonate, infant, child, and adolescent. J Cardiovasc Nurs 6(3):1–11CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Butts RJ et al (2012) Comparison of maximum Vasoactive Inotropic Score and low cardiac output syndrome as markers of early postoperative outcomes after neonatal cardiac surgery. Pediatr Cardiol 33(4):633–638PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cabrera AG et al (2009) Preoperative lymphopenia is a predictor of postoperative adverse outcomes in children with congenital heart disease. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 138(5):1172–1179CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Davidson J et al (2012) Prospective validation of the Vasoactive-Inotropic Score and correlation to short-term outcomes in neonates and infants after cardiothoracic surgery. Intensive Care Med 38(7):1184–1190CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Duffy BK et al (2006) Usefulness of an elevated neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio in predicting long-term mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Cardiol 97(7):993–996CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gaies MG et al (2010) Vasoactive-Inotropic Score as a predictor of morbidity and mortality in infants after cardiopulmonary bypass. Pediatr Crit Care Med 11(2):234–238CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gaies MG et al (2014) Vasoactive-Inotropic Score is associated with outcome after infant cardiac surgery: an analysis from the Pediatric Cardiac Critical Care Consortium and Virtual PICU System Registries. Pediatr Crit Care Med 15(6):529–537PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Grossman A et al (2014) Cardiac indexes in young subjects with and without bicuspid aortic valve. Aviat Space Environ Med 85(2):135–138CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Horne BD et al (2005) Which white blood cell subtypes predict increased cardiovascular risk? J Am Coll Cardiol 45(10):1638–1643CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jackman L et al (2009) Late-onset hyperlactataemia following paediatric cardiac surgery. Intensive Care Med 35(3):537–545CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jacobs JP et al (2014) Reoperations for pediatric and congenital heart disease: an analysis of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) congenital heart surgery database. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Pediatr Card Surg Annu 17(1):2–8PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kim JW et al (2015) Preoperative factors as a predictor for early postoperative outcomes after repair of congenital transposition of the great arteries. Pediatr Cardiol 36(3):537–542CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kogon B, Oster M (2014) Assessing surgical risk for adults with congenital heart disease: Are pediatric scoring systems appropriate? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 147(2):666–671CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kumar M et al (2014) Vasoactive Inotrope Score as a tool for clinical care in children post cardiac surgery. Indian J Crit Care Med 18(10):653–658PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Laranjo S et al (2015) An insight into the autonomic and haemodynamic mechanisms underlying reflex syncope in children and adolescents: a multiparametric analysis. Cardiol Young 25(4):647–654CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lex DJ et al (2014) A comparison of the systems for the identification of postoperative acute kidney injury in pediatric cardiac patients. Ann Thorac Surg 97(1):202–210CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Meert KL, McCaulley L, Sarnaik AP (2012) Mechanism of lactic acidosis in children with acute severe asthma. Pediatr Crit Care Med 13(1):28–31CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mitchell E et al (2014) Neutrophil/Lymphocyte ratio and association with arch intervention in patients with hypoplastic left heart syndrome undergoing hybrid procedure. Congenit Heart Dis 9(6):543–548CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    O’Brien SM et al (2009) An empirically based tool for analyzing mortality associated with congenital heart surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 138(5):1139–1153CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Rudolph AM (2009) Congenital diseases of the heart: clinical-physiological considerations, 3rd edn. Wiley, Chichester, HobokenCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sanil Y, Aggarwal S (2013) Vasoactive-Inotropic Score after pediatric heart transplant: a marker of adverse outcome. Pediatr Transpl 17(6):567–572CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Schoentag RA, Cangiarella J (1993) The nuances of lymphocytopenia. Clin Lab Med 13(4):923–936PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wernovsky G et al (1995) Postoperative course and hemodynamic profile after the arterial switch operation in neonates and infants. A comparison of low-flow cardiopulmonary bypass and circulatory arrest. Circulation 92(8):2226–2235CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Richard U. Garcia
    • 1
    Email author
  • Henry L. WaltersIII
    • 2
  • Ralph E. Delius
    • 2
  • Sanjeev Aggarwal
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Cardiology, Carman and Ann Adams Department of Pediatrics, Children’s Hospital of MichiganWayne State University School of MedicineDetroitUSA
  2. 2.Division of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, Carman and Ann Adams Department of Pediatrics, Children’s Hospital of MichiganWayne State University School of MedicineDetroitUSA

Personalised recommendations