Skip to main content
Log in

Measurement of Cardiac Output in Children by Pressure-Recording Analytical Method

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Cardiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We evaluated two pressure-recording analytical method (PRAM) software versions (v.1 and v.2) to measure cardiac index (CI) in hemodynamically stable critically ill children and investigate factors that influence PRAM values. The working hypothesis was that PRAM CI measurements would stay within normal limits in hemodynamically stable patients. Ninety-five CI PRAM measurements were analyzed in 47 patients aged 1–168 months. Mean CI was 4.1 ± 1.4 L/min/m2 (range 2.0–7.0). CI was outside limits defined as normal (3–5 L/min/m2) in 53.7 % of measurements (47.8 % with software v.1 and 69.2 % with software v.2, p = 0.062). Moreover, 14.7 % of measurements were below 2.5 L/min/m2, and 13.6 % were above 6 L/min/m2. CI was significantly lower in patients with a clearly visible dicrotic notch than in those without (3.7 vs. 4.6 L/min/m2, p = 0.004) and in children with a radial arterial catheter (3.5 L/min/m2) than in those with a brachial (4.4 L/min/m2, p = 0.021) or femoral catheter (4.7 L/min/m2, p = 0.005). By contrast, CI was significantly higher in children under 12 months (4.2 vs. 3.6 L/min/m2, p = 0.034) and weighing under 10 kg (4.2 vs. 3.6 L/min/m2, p = 0.026). No significant differences were observed between cardiac surgery patients and the rest of children. A high percentage of CI measurements registered by PRAM were outside normal limits in hemodynamically stable, critically ill children. CI measured by PRAM may be influenced by the age, weight, location of catheter, and presence of a dicrotic notch.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ballestero Y, López-Herce J, Urbano J, Solana MJ, Botrán M, Bellón JM, Carrillo A (2011) Measurement of cardiac output in children by bioreactance. Pediatr Cardiol 32:469–472

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ballestero Y, Urbano J, López-Herce J, Solana MJ, Botrán M, Vinciguerra D, Bellón JM (2012) Pulmonary arterial thermodilution, femoral arterial thermodilution and bioreactance cardiac output monitoring in a pediatric hemorrhagic hypovolemic shock model. Resuscitation 83:125–129

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Biais M, Cottencau V, Stecken L, Jean M, Ottolenghi L, Roullet S, Quinart A, Sztark F (2012) Evaluation of stroke volume variations obtained with the pressure-recording analytic method. Crit Care Med 40:1186–1191

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Boehne M, Baustert M, Paetzel V, Köditz H, Schoof S, Happel CM, Bertram H (2014) Determination of cardiac output by ultrasound dilution technique in infants and children: a validation study against direct Fick principle. Br J Anaesth 112:469–476

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Burattini R, Di Salvia PO (2007) Development of systemic arterial mechanical properties from infancy to adulthood interpreted by four-element windkessel models. J Appl Physiol 103:66–79

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Calamandrei M, Mirabeli L, Muschetta S, Gensini GF, De Siomne L, Romano SM (2008) Assessment of cardiac output in children: a comparison between the pressure-recording analytical method and Doppler echocardiography. Pediatr Crit Care Med 9:310–312

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Compton F, Schäfer JH (2009) Noninvasive cardiac output determination: broadening the applicability of hemodynamic monitoring. Semin Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 13:44–55

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Crittendon I 3rd, Dreyer WJ, Decker JA, Kim JJ (2012) Ultrasound dilution: an accurate means of determining cardiac output in children. Pediatr Crit Care Med 13:42–46

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. de Wilde RB, Geerts BF, Cui J, van den Berg PC, Jansen JR (2009) Performance of three minimally invasive cardiac output monitoring systems. Anaesthesia 64:762–769

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Dellinger RP, Levy MM, Carlet JM, Bion J, Parker MM, Jaeschke R, Reinhart K, Angus DC, Brun-Buisson C, Beale R, Calandra T, Dhainaut JF, Gerlach H, Harvey M, Marini JJ, Marshall J, Ranieri M, Ramsay G, Sevransky J, Thompson BT, Townsend S, Vender JS, Zimmerman JL, Vincent JL, International Surviving Sepsis Campaign Guidelines Committee, American Association of Critical-Care Nurses; American College of Chest Physicians, American College of Emergency Physicians, Canadian Critical Care Society, European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, European Society of Intensive Care Medicine, European Respiratory Society, International Sepsis Forum, Japanese Association for Acute Medicine, Japanese Society of Intensive Care Medicine, Society of Critical Care Medicine, Society of Hospital Medicine, Surgical Infection Society, World Federation of Societies of Intensive and Critical Care Medicine. (2008) Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: Crit Care Med.;36:296-327

  11. Egan JR, Festa M, Cole AD, Nunn GR, Gillis J, Winlaw DS (2005) Clinical assessment of cardiac performance in infants and children following cardiac surgery. Intensive Care Med 31:568–573

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gazit AZ, Cooper DS (2011) Emerging technologies. Pediatr Crit Care Med 12(suppl):S55–S61

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Giomarelli P, Biagioli B, Scolletta S (2004) Cardiac output monitoring by pressure-recording analytical method in cardiac surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 26:515–520

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. López-Herce J, Bustinza A, Sancho L, Mencía S, Carrillo A, Moral R, Bellón JM (2009) Cardiac output and blood volume parameters using femoral arterial thermodilution. Pediatr Int 51:59–65

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Mathews L, Singh KRK (2008) Cardiac output monitoring. Ann Card Anaesth 11:56–68

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Paarmann H, Groesdonk HV, Sedemund-Adib B, Hanke T, Heinze H, Heringlake M, Schön J (2011) Lack of agreement between pulmonary arterial thermodilution cardiac output and the pressure-recording analytical method in post-operative cardiac surgery patients. Br J Anaesth 106:475–481

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Proulx F, Lemson J, Choker G, Tibby SM (2011) Hemodynamic monitoring by transpulmonary thermodilution and pulse contour analysis in critically ill children. Pediatr Crit Care Med 12:459–466

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Romano SM, Pistolesi M (2002) Assessment of cardiac output from systemic arterial pressure in humans. Crit Care Med 30:1834–1841

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Rupérez M, López-Herce J, García C, Sánchez C, García E, Vigil D (2004) Comparison between cardiac output measured by the pulmonary arterial thermodilution technique and that measured by the femoral arterial thermodilution technique in a pediatric animal model. Pediatr Cardiol 25:119–123

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Saxena R, Durward A, Puppala NK, Murdoch IA, Tibby SM (2013) pressure-recording analytical method for measuring cardiac output in critically ill children: a validation study. Br J Anaesth 110:425–431

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Scolletta S, Romano SM, Biagioli B, Capannini G, Giomarelli P (2005) pressure-recording analytical method (PRAM) for measurement of cardiac output during various haemodynamic states. Br J Anaesth 95:159–165

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Scolletta S, Donadello K, Taccone ES, Franchi F (2010) The mostcare (PRAM) system. Minerva Anestesiol 76(Suppl 1):1–4

    Google Scholar 

  23. Senzaki H, Akagi M, Hishi T, Ishizawa A, Yanagisawa M, Masutani S, Kobayashi T, Awa S (2002) Age-associated changes in arterial elastic properties in children. Eur J Pediatr 161:547–551

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Tibby SM, Murdoch IA (2003) Monitoring cardiac function in intensive care. Arch Dis Child 88:46–52

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Tibby SM, Hatherill M, Durward A, Murdoch IA (2001) Are transoesophageal Doppler parameters a reliable guide to paediatric haemodynamic status and fluid management? Intensive Care Med 27:201–205

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Van Lieshout JJ, Wesseling KH (2001) Continuous cardiac output by pulse contour analysis? Br J Aanesth 86:467–469

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

To the nurses of the Pediatric Intensive Care Department of the Gregorio Marañón General University Hospital, Madrid, Spain, for their collaboration in performing the study.

This study has been (partially) supported by a grant from the Spanish Health Institute Carlos III (RD12/0026/006). JU has a research contract “Juan Rodés”; JL has a research contract “Río Hortega”; RG has a predoctoral research contract all by the Spanish Health Institute Carlos III.

MostcareR monitor was provided for the study by Vytech Health, Padova, Italy.

Conflict of interest

The responsible author declares that the submission is with the full knowledge and approval of the listed coauthors, and declare to have no conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jesús López-Herce.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Urbano, J., López, J., González, R. et al. Measurement of Cardiac Output in Children by Pressure-Recording Analytical Method. Pediatr Cardiol 36, 358–364 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-014-1014-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-014-1014-3

Keywords

Navigation