Skip to main content
Log in

Ultrasound- Versus Landmark-Guided Femoral Catheterization in the Pediatric Catheterization Laboratory: A Randomized-Controlled Trial

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Cardiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ultrasound (US) is the standard of care for vascular access in many clinical scenarios. Limited data exist regarding the benefits of US- versus landmark (LM)-guided femoral vascular access in the pediatric catheterization laboratory. This study aimed to compare US- and LM-guided vascular access in the pediatric catheterization laboratory. A single operator randomized 95 patients (201 vessels) to undergo either LM- or US-guided vascular access. The primary end point was the access success rate. Number of attempts, inadvertent access, time to sheath placement, and complications also were compared between the two groups. No difference was seen in the overall access success rate: 98 % with US versus 93 % with LM (p = 0.17). The success rate for the targeted vessel was higher with US (89 %) than with LM (67 %) (p = 0.012). US facilitated fewer attempts (1.1 ± 0.4 vs 1.4 ± 0.9; p = 0.048) and improved the first-attempt success rate (87 vs 77 %; p = 0.049). The time to access did not differ significantly between the two groups (US 2:55 ± 4:03 vs LM 3:37 ± 2:54; p = 0.28). No differences in complication rates were noted. The benefits of US were accentuated in the subgroup weighing less than 10 kg. In this study, US access in the pediatric catheterization laboratory did not improve overall success. However, US improved accuracy and reduced the number attempts necessary for access without prolonging the access time of the procedure. Small children realized the greatest benefit of US-guided access.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Al Sofyani K, Julia G, Abdulaziz B, Sylvain R (2012) Ultrasound guidance for central vascular access in the neonatal and pediatric intensive care unit. Anaesthesia 6:120–124

    Google Scholar 

  2. Alten JA, Borasino S, Gurley WQ, Law MA, Toms R, Dabal RJ (2012) Ultrasound-guided femoral vein catheterization in neonates with cardiac disease. Pediatr Crit Care Med 13:654–659

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Altin RS, Flicker S, Naidech HJ (1988) Pseudoaneurysm and arteriovenous fistula after femoral artery catheterization: association with low femoral punctures. Am J Roentgenol 152:629–631

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Aouad MT, Kanazi GE, Abdallah FW, Moukaddem FH, Turbay MJ, Obeid MY, Siddik-Sayid SM (2010) Femoral vein cannulation performed by residents: a comparison between ultrasound-guided and landmark technique in infants and children undergoing cardiac surgery. Anesth Analg 111:724–728

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Atkinson P, Boyle A, Robinson S, Campbell-Hewson G (2005) Should ultrasound guidance be used for central venous catheterization in the emergency department. Emerg Med J 22:158–164

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Baum P, Matsumoto A, Teitelbaum G, Zuurbier R, Barth K (1989) Anatomic relationships between the common femoral artery and vein: CT evaluation and clinical significance. Radiology 173:775–777

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Brotschi B, Hug MI, Latal B, Neuhaus D, Buerki C, Kroiss S, Spoerri C (2011) Incidence and predictors of indwelling arterial catheter-related thrombosis in children. J Thromb Haemost 9:1157–1162

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cassidy SC, Schmidt KG, Van Harl GF, Stanger P, Teitel DF (1992) Complications of pediatric cardiac catheterization: a 3-year study. J Am Coll Cardiol 19:1285–1293

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Froehlich CD, Rigby MR, Rosenberg ES, Roerig PL, Easley KA, Stockwell JA (2009) Ultrasound-guided central venous catheter placement decreases complications and decreases placement attempts compared with the landmark technique in patients in a pediatric intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 37:1090–1096

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Girod DA, Harwitz RA, Caldwell RL (1982) Heparinization for prevention of thrombosis following pediatric percutaneous arterial catheterization. Pediatr Cardiol 3:175–180

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Goerig M, Agarwal K (2008) Werner Forssmann: “the typical man before his time!”: self-experiment shows feasibility of cardiac catheterization. AINS 43:162–165

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Grebenik CR, Boyce A, Sinclair ME, Evans RD, Mason DG, Martin B (2004) NICE guidelines for central venous catheterization in children: is the evidence base sufficient? Br J Anaesth 92:827–830

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hind D, Calvert N, McWilliams R, Davdison A, Paisley S, Beverley C, Thomas S (2003) Ultrasonic locating devices for central venous cannulation: meta-analysis. BMJ 327:361

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ino T, Benson LN, Freedom RM, Barker GA, Airpursky A, Rowe RD (1998) Thrombolytic therapy for femoral artery thrombosis after pediatric cardiac catheterization. Am Heart J 115:633–639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Iwashima S, Ishikawa T, Onzeke T (2008) Ultrasound-guided versus landmark-guided femoral access in pediatric cardiac catheterization. Pediatr Cardiol 29:339–342

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kim D, Orron DE, Skillman JJ et al (1992) Role of superficial femoral artery puncture in the development of pseudoaneurysm and arteriovenous fistula complicating percutaneous transfemoral cardiac catheterization. Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn 25:91–97

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kroger K, Netterlrodt J, Müntches C, Neudorf U, Feuersenger A, Rudofsky G, Schmalz AA (2004) Impact of age, height, and body mass index on arterial diameters in infants and children: a model for predicting femoral artery diameter prior to cardiovascular procedures. J Endovasc Ther 11:419–423

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lewi G, Taylor DC, Reith E, Wasnick JD (2005) Utility of ultrasound-guided central venous cannulation in pediatric surgical patients: a clinical series. Paediatr Anaesth 15:953–958

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lewi G, Taylor DG, Reith E, Wasnick JD (2005) Utility of ultrasound-guided central venous cannulation in pediatric surgical patients: a clinical series. Paediatr Anaesth 15:953–958

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Misolek H, Karpe J, Jalowiecki P, Marcinkowski A, Grzanka M (2012) Usefulness of ultrasound guidance for central venous catheterization in patients with end-stage renal disease. Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther 44:208–211

    Google Scholar 

  21. Seto AH, Abu-Fadel MS, Sparling JM, Zacharias SJ, Daly TS, Harrison AT, Suh WM, Vera JA, Aston CE, Winters RJ, Patel PM, Hennebry TA, Kern MJ (2013) Real-time ultrasound guidance facilitates femoral arterial access and reduces vascular complications: femoral arterial access with ultrasound trial (FAUST). JACC Cardiovasc Interv 3:751–758

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Shekelle PG, Wachter RM, Pronovost PJ, Schoelles K, McDonald KM, Dy SM, Shojania K, Reston J, Berger Z, Johnsen B, Larkin JW, Lucas S, Martinez K, Motala A, Newberry SJ, Noble M, Pfoh E, Ranji SR, Rennke S, Schmidt E, Shanman R, Sullivan N, Sun F, Tipton K, Treadwell JR, Tsou A, Vaiana ME, Weaver SJ, Wilson R, Winters BD (2013) Making health care safer II: an updated critical analysis of the evidence for patient safety practices: comparative effectiveness review no. 211 (prepared by the Southern California-RAND Evidence-based Practice Center under Contract No. 290-2007-10062-I). AHRQ publication no. 13-E001-EF. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville. http://www.ahrq.gov/research/findings/evidence-based-reports/ptsafetyuptp.html. Accessed 2 Mar 2013

  23. Trojanos CA, Hartman GS, Glas KE, Skubas NJ, Eberhardt RT, Walker JD, Reeves ST, Councils on Intraoperative Echocardiography and Vascular Ultrasound of the American Society of Echocardiography (2011) Guidelines for performing ultrasound-guided vascular cannulation: recommendations of the American Society of Echocardiography and the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 24:1291–1318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Venkataraman ST, Thompson AE, Orr RA (1997) Femoral vascular catheterization in critically ill infants and children. Clin Pediatr Phila 36:311–319

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Venkataraman S, Thompson A, Orr R (1997) Femoral vascular catheterization in critically ill infants and children. Clin Pediatr 36:311–319

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Vitello R, McCrindle BW, Nykanen D, Freedom RM, Benson LN (1998) Complications associated with pediatric cardiac catheterization. J Am Coll Cardiol 32:1433–1440

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark A. Law.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Law, M.A., Borasino, S., McMahon, W.S. et al. Ultrasound- Versus Landmark-Guided Femoral Catheterization in the Pediatric Catheterization Laboratory: A Randomized-Controlled Trial. Pediatr Cardiol 35, 1246–1252 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-014-0923-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-014-0923-5

Keywords

Navigation