Skip to main content

The Experience of Parents and Children Where Children Have Been Supported with a Ventricular Assist Device as a Bridge to Heart Transplantation

Abstract

There is little information to assist in understanding the experience endured by parents and children where children have been supported with a ventricular assist device (VAD) as a bridge to heart transplantation. Consequently, the aims of this study were to gain an understanding of children’s and parents’ experience where children have been supported with a VAD as a bridge to heart transplantation and to use this information to improve the Royal Children’s Hospital (RCH) VAD program. This study employed a qualitative approach using purposive sampling. Semistructured interviews were conducted with children aged 13 years or more and their parents to determine their experience of having required VAD support as a bridge to transplantation. Results demonstrated a lack of information that prepared families and children for the anticipated course of treatment on VAD support. Recommendations to improve the VAD program for parents and children include more information through meetings, as well as in a written format, and speaking to other families who had already experienced VAD. For children in particular, a visual of the VAD, its associated equipment, and an image of where it is placed in the body is vital information that is necessary prior to VAD support. Overall, the recommendations are important and should be made available to improve the experience for children and parents, not only of the RCH VAD program but for all hospitals offering VAD therapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Bunzel B, Laederach-Hofmann K, Wieselthaler G, Roethy W, Drees G (2005) Posttraumatic stress disorder after implantation of a mechanical assist device followed by heart transplantation: evaluation of patients and partners. Transplant Proc 37:1365–1368

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bunzel B, Laederach-Hofmann K, Wieselthaler G, Roethy W, Wolner E (2007) Mechanical circulatory support as a bridge to heart transplantation: what remains? Long-term emotional sequelae in patients and spouses. J Heart Lung Transplant 26:384–389

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Claassen M (2000) A handful of questions: supporting parental decision making. Clin Nurse Spec 14:189–195

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Chapman E, Parameshwar J, Jenkins D, Large S, Tsui S (2007) Psychological issues for patients with ventricular assist devices: a qualitative pilot study. Am J Crit Care 16:72–81

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Eder ML, Yamokoski AD, Wittman PW, Kodish ED (2007) Improving informed consent: suggestions from parents of children with leukemia. Pediatrics 119:849–859

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Grady KL, Meyer PM, Mattea A, Dressler D, Ormaza S, White-Williams C, Chillcott S, Kaan A, Loo A, Todd B, Klemme A, Piccione W, Costanzo MR (2003) Change in quality of life from before to after discharge following left ventricular assist device implantation. J Heart Lung Transplant 22:322–333

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Levetown M (2008) Communicating with children and families: from everyday interactions to skill in conveying distressing information. Pediatrics 121:1441–1460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Liamputtong P, Ezzy D (2005) Qualitative research methods, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, South Melbourne, pp 265–274

    Google Scholar 

  9. MacIver J, Ross HJ (2005) Withdrawal of ventricular assist device support. J Palliat Care 21:151–156

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Miles MB, Huberman AM (1994) Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook, 2nd edn. Sage, San Diego, pp 10–11

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sharma MS, Webber SA, Morell VO, Gandhi SK, Wearden PD, Buchanan JR, Kormos RL (2006) Ventricular assist device support in children and adolescents as a bridge to heart transplantation. Ann Thorac Surg 82:333–926

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Steven M, Broadis E, Carachi R, Brindley N (2008) Sign on the dotted line: parental consent. Pediatr Surg Int 24:847–849

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Tymstra T (1989) The imperative character of medical technology and the meaning of “anticipated decision regret”. Int J Technol Asses Health Care 5:207–213

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Wray J, Hallas CN, Banner NR (2007) Quality of life and psychological well-being during and after left ventricular assist device support. Clin Transplant 21:622–627

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Koller D (2006) Child Life Council Evidence-Based Practice Statement: Preparing Children and Adolescents for Medical Procedures. http://www.childlife.org/files/EBPPreparationStatement-Complete.pdf. Accessed 11 Feb 2011)

Download references

Acknowledgments

Many thanks for Jenni Livingston and Lynn Gillam for their ongoing assistance and support throughout this research project. A special thanks to Dr. Yves d’Udekem, Professor Daniel Penny, and Dr. Robert Weintraub for their expertise in making the RCH VAD and Heart Transplant Program a success.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hollie Gilmore.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gilmore, H., Newall, F. The Experience of Parents and Children Where Children Have Been Supported with a Ventricular Assist Device as a Bridge to Heart Transplantation. Pediatr Cardiol 32, 772–777 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-011-9962-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-011-9962-3

Keywords

  • Ventricular assist device (VAD)
  • Heart transplantation
  • Paediatrics
  • Families