Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Measuring Stress Velocity Index Using Mean Blood Pressure: Simple yet Accurate?

  • Original
  • Published:
Pediatric Cardiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The stress velocity index, or the relationship of the rate-corrected mean velocity of circumferential shortening (VCFc) to the end systolic wall stress (ESWS), is a sensitive, load-independent measure of left ventricular contractility. ESWS is technically difficult to obtain and requires simultaneous blood pressure measurement, carotid artery tracing, and phonocardiogram. We report our comparison of two simpler methods of measuring ESWS and, therefore, stress velocity index. Patients with normal cardiac anatomy who had completed anthracycline chemotherapy were evaluated. ESWS as measured by the standard method using a carotid artery tracing (ESWScar) was compared to ESWS obtained using mean arterial pressure (ESWSmap) or systolic blood pressure (ESWSsbp). The cohort included 63 patients, with 37 (59%) males and a median age of 13.1 years. The mean (±SD) ESWScar was 53.3±15.3 g/cm2 (range, 26.3–94 g/cm2); ESWSmap, 53 ±13.4 g/cm2 (range, 27.1–86.1 g/cm2); and ESWSsbp, 72.9 ± 18.2 g/cm2 (range, 40.8–117.2 g/cm2). ESWSmap and ESWSsbp closely correlated with ESWScar (coefficient correlation r = 0.88 and r = 0.87, respectively). Using ESWSmap, all patients were correctly classified as having normal or abnormal contractility as defined by stress velocity index, whereas ESWSsbp detected only two of the six patients with impaired contractility. We conclude that ESWSmap is a simple, highly sensitive and specific method for assessing left ventricular contractility. ESWSmap correlates closely with ESWScar and can be incorporated into the monitoring of cardiac dysfunction in the anthracycline-treated population. Further studies are needed to determine if this simplified measure accurately assesses the ESWS in other cardiac disease states.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aggarwal S, Pettersen MD, Bhambhani K, Gurczynski J, Thomas R, L'Ecuyer T (2007) B-type natriuretic peptide as a marker for cardiac dysfunction in anthracycline-treated children. Pediatr Blood Cancer 49: 812–816

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1:307–310

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Borow KM, Neumann A, Marcus RH, Sareli P, Lang RM (1992) Effects of simultaneous alterations in preload and afterload on measurements of left ventricular contractility in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy: comparisons of ejection phase, isovolumetric and end-systolic force-velocity indexes. J Am Coll Cardiol 20:787–795

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Colan SD, Borow KM, Neumann A (1984) Left ventricular end-systolic wall stress-velocity of fiber shortening relation: a load-independent index of myocardial contractility. J Am Coll Cardiol 4:715–724

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Courand JA, Marshall J, Chang Y, King ME (2001) Clinical applications of wall-stress analysis in the pediatric intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 29:526–533

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Karr SS, Martin GR (1994) A simplified method for calculating wall stress in infants and children. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 7:646–651

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lipshultz SE, Orav EJ, Sanders SP, Hale AR, McIntosh K, Colan SD (1992) Cardiac structure and function in children with human immunodeficiency virus infection treated with zidovudine. N Engl J Med 327:1260–1265

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Ross J Jr (1976) Afterload mismatch and preload reserve: a conceptual framework for the analysis of ventricular function. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 18:255–264

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Rowland DG, Gutgesell HP (1994) Use of mean arterial pressure for noninvasive determination of left ventricular end-systolic wall stress in infants and children. Am J Cardiol 74:98–99

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Sahn DJ, DeMaria A, Kisslo J, Weyman A (1978) Recommendations regarding quantitation in M-mode echocardiography: results of a survey of echocardiographic measurements. Circulation 58:1072–1083

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Sandor GG, Popov R, De Souza E, Morris S, Johnston B (1992) Rate-corrected mean velocity of fiber shortening-stress at peak systole as a load-independent measure of contractility. Am J Cardiol 69:403–407

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sanjeev Aggarwal.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Aggarwal, S., Pettersen, M.D., Gurckzynski, J. et al. Measuring Stress Velocity Index Using Mean Blood Pressure: Simple yet Accurate?. Pediatr Cardiol 29, 108–112 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-007-9101-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-007-9101-3

Keywords

Navigation