Skip to main content
Log in

Zero-Sum Stochastic Differential Game in Finite Horizon Involving Impulse Controls

  • Published:
Applied Mathematics & Optimization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper considers the problem of two-player zero-sum stochastic differential game with both players adopting impulse controls in finite horizon under rather weak assumptions on the cost functions (c and \(\chi \) not decreasing in time). We use the dynamic programming principle and viscosity solutions approach to show existence and uniqueness of a solution for the Hamilton–Jacobi–Bellman–Isaacs (HJBI) partial differential equation (PDE) of the game. We prove that the upper and lower value functions coincide.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aïd, R., Basei, M., Callegaro, G., Campi, L., Vargiolu, T.: Nonzero-sum stochastic differential games with impulse controls: a verification theorem with applications. arXiv preprint arXiv:1605.00039 (2016)

  2. Azimzadeh, P.: Zero-sum stochastic differential game with impulses, precommitment and unrestricted cost functions. Appl. Math. Optim. 1–32 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00245-017-9445-x

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Bayraktar, E., Huang, J-Y.: On the multidimensional controller and stopper games. SIAM J. Control Optim. (2013)

  4. Bayraktar, E., Emmerling, T., Menaldi, J.-L.: On the impulse control of jump diffusions. SIAM J. Control Optim. 51(3), 2612–2637 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Beer, G.: Topologies on Closed and Closed Convex Sets. Kluwer, Dordrecht (1993)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Belak, C., Christensen, S., Seifried, F.T.: A general verification result for stochastic impulse control problems. SIAM J. Control Optim. 55(2), 627–649 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Benth, F.E., Kholodnyi, V.A., Laurence, P. (eds.): Quantitative Energy Finance. Springer, New York (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bouchard, B.: Introduction to stochastic control of mixed diffusion processes, viscosity solutions and applications in finance and insurance. In: Lecture Notes Preprint (2007)

  9. Bouchard, B., Touzi, N.: Weak dynamic programming principle for viscosity solutions. SIAM J. Control Optim. 49(3), 948–962 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Buckdahn, R., Li, J.: Stochastic differential games and viscosity solutions of Hamilton–Jacobi–Bellman–Isaacs equations. SIAM J. Control Optim. 47, 444–475 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Cadenillas, A., Zapatero, F.: Optimal central bank intervention in the foreign exchange market. J. Econ. Theory 97, 218–242 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Cadenillas, A., Choulli, T., Taksar, M., Zhang, L.: Classical and impulse stochastic control for the optimization of the dividend and risk policies of an insurance firm. Math. Financ. 16, 181–202 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Chen, Y.-S.A., Guo, X.: Impulse control of multidimensional jump diffusions in finite time horizon. SIAM J. Control Optim. 51(3), 2638–2663 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Cosso, A.: Stochastic diferential games involving impulse controls and double-obstacle quasi-variational inequalities. SIAM J. Control Optim. 51(3), 2102–2131 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Crandall, M., Ishii, H., Lions, P.L.: Users guide to viscosity solutions of second order partial differential equations. Bull. Am. Math. Soc. 27, 1–67 (1992)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Dugundji, J.: Topolgy. Allyn and Bacon, Boston (1966)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Eastham, J.E., Hastings, K.J.: Optimal impulse control of portfolios. Math. Oper. Res. 13, 588–605 (1988)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. El Asri, B.: Minimax impulse control problems in finite horizon. arXiv:1305.0914 (2013)

  19. El Asri, B.: Stochastic optimal multi-modes switching with a viscosity solution approach. Stoch. Process. Appl. 123, 579–602 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. El Asri, B.: Deterministic minimax impulse control in finite horizon: the viscosity solution approach. ESAIM Control Optim. Calc. Var. 19, 63–77 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Evans, L.C., Souganidis, P.E.: Differential games and representation formulas for solutions of Hamilton–Jacobi–Isaacs equations. Indiana Univ. Math. J. 33(5), 773–797 (1984)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Fleming, W.H., Souganidis, P.E.: On the existence of value functions of two-player, zero-sum stochastic differential games. Indiana Univ. Math. J. 38(2), 293–314 (1989)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Hamadène, S., Lepeltier, J.-P., Peng, S.: BSDEs with continuous coefficients and stochastic differential games. In: Pitman Research Notes in Mathematics Series, pp. 115–128 (1997)

  24. Hamadène, S., Hassani, M.: BSDEs with two reflecting barriers: the general result. Probab. Theory Relat. Fields 132, 237–264 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Isaacs, R.: Differential games: a mathematical theory with applications to warfare and pursuit, control and optimization. Wiley, New York, London, Sydney (1965)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Jaillet, P., Ronn, E.I., Tompaidis, S.: Valuation of commodity-based swing options. Manag. Sci. 50, 909–921 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Jeanblanc, M., Shiryayev, S.: Optimization of the flow of dividends. Russ. Math. Surv. 50, 257–277 (1995)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. Jeanblanc-Picqué, M.: Impulse control method and exchange rate. Math. Financ. 3, 161–177 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Karatzas, I., Wang, H.: A barrier option of American type. Appl. Math. Optim. 42, 259–279 (2000)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  30. Karatzas, I., Zamfirescu, I.-M.: Game approach to the optimal stopping problem. Stochastics 77, 401–435 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  31. Kharroubi, I., Ma, J., Pham, H., Zhang, J.: Backward SDEs with constrained jumps and quasi-variational inequalities. Ann. Probab. 38, 794–840 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  32. Korn, R.: Protfolio optimization with strictly positive transaction costs and impulse control. Financ. Stoch. 2, 85–114 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Korn, R.: Some applications of impulse control in mathematical finance. Math. Methods Oper. Res. 50, 493–518 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  34. LyVath, V., Mnif, M., Pham, H.: A model of optimal portfolio selection under liquidity risk and price impact. Financ. Stoch. 11, 51–90 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  35. Mauer, D.C., Triantis, A.: Interactions of corporate financing and investment decisions: a dynamic framework. J. Financ. 49, 1253–1277 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Morton, A.J., Pliska, S.: Optimal portfolio management with fixed transaction costs. Math. Financ. 5, 337–356 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Mundaca, G., Oksendal, B.: Optimal stochastic intervention control with application to the exchange rate. J. Math. Econom. 29, 225–243 (1998)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  38. Oksendal, B., Sulem, A.: Optimal consumption and portfolio with both fixed and proportional transaction costs. SIAM J. Control. Optim. 40, 1765–1790 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  39. Pham, H.: Optimal stopping of controlled jump diffusion processes: a viscosity solution approach. J. Math. Syst. Estim. Control 8, 1–27 (1998)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  40. Seydel, R.C.: Existence and uniqueness of viscosity solutions for QVI associated with impulse control of jump-diffusions. Stoch. Process. Appl. 119(10), 3719–3748 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  41. Stettner, L.: Zero-sum Markov games with stopping and impulsive strategies. Appl. Math. Optim. 9, 1–24 (1982)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  42. Tang, S., Yong, J.M.: Finite horizon stochastic optimal switching and impulse controls with a viscosity solution approach. Stoch. Stoch. Rep. 45(3–4), 145–176 (1993)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  43. Yong, J.M.: Zero-sum differential games involving impulse controls. Appl. Math. Optim. 29, 243–261 (1994)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  44. Zhang, F.: Stochastic differential games involving impulse controls. ESAIM Control Optim. Calc. Var. 17(3), 749–760 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank gratefully Professor A. Popier and Professor S. Hamadène for helpful discussions and suggestions related to this work. We also would like to thank the referees for their careful reading and for their helpful comments and suggestions that led to considerable improvements in the paper. \(\square \)

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brahim El Asri.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

El Asri, B., Mazid, S. Zero-Sum Stochastic Differential Game in Finite Horizon Involving Impulse Controls. Appl Math Optim 81, 1055–1087 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00245-018-9529-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00245-018-9529-2

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation