Skip to main content
Log in

Supercritical Fluid Extraction and Solid-Phase Extraction of AC 263,222 and Imazethapyr from Three Texas Soils

  • Published:
Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract.

Supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) using CO2 and solid-phase extraction (SPE) are two technologies recently discussed in the literature as alternatives to Soxhlet and liquid/liquid extraction (LLE). This research compared SFE and SPE extraction efficiency of two imidazolinone herbicides, AC263,222 and imazethapyr, from three soils. Recovery of the herbicides using SFE-CO2 with a 4.6:1 acetonitrile:acetic acid cosolvent was approximately 80% for Poth and Tremona soils and 60% when extracted from Ships soil with high clay content and high pH. SPE recovery of both herbicides averaged 78% and was not statistically different between soils. Combining SPE disks with a SPE cartridge cleanup procedure provided a faster filtration with cleaner filtrate compared with using SPE C-18 cartridges by themselves. Cleanup was needed after both SFE and SPE disk extraction due to interfering peaks in the chromatography.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Accepted: 19 April 1999

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pace, P., Senseman, S., Ketchersid, M. et al. Supercritical Fluid Extraction and Solid-Phase Extraction of AC 263,222 and Imazethapyr from Three Texas Soils. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 37, 440–444 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/s002449900538

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s002449900538

Keywords

Navigation