Abstract
The increasing contamination of water bodies with mercury raises concerns about its possible effects on aquatic organisms. The combined use of several biomarkers allows researchers to study the impact of a chemical at different levels of biological organization. In the present work, we determined the response of histological (gills and liver), somatic (condition factor and hepato-somatic index), and behavioral (predator–prey relationship, through the presentation of a computer-animated image) biomarkers in the native species Psalidodon eigenmanniorum exposed to 100 µg L−1 of inorganic Hg (IHg) during 96 h. We also assessed whether there was a change in the biomarkers analyzed after 7 days in Hg-free water compared with those exposed to IHg. In exposed fish, IHg caused damage to the gills and liver tissues. The condition factor showed no difference between IHg-exposed organisms and control organisms, while the hepato-somatic index was lower in IHg-exposed fish. As for the behavioral analyses, it was observed that the presentation of a stimulus induced changes in the behavioral responses of fish exposed to IHg, which showed a heightened state of alertness with respect to control. On the other hand, after 7 days in Hg-free water, the organisms generally showed no changes in biomarkers compared with IHg-exposed fish. Our results contribute new data on IHg toxicity in a native species and provide information on the plasticity of damage to reverse itself. Furthermore, this work provides baseline information for environmental assessments in water bodies where mercury is present.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Availability of Data and Materials
Not applicable.
Code Availability
Not applicable.
References
Ahmed O, Seguin D, Gerlai R (2011) An automated predator avoidance task in zebrafish. Behav Brain Res 216:166–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2010.07.028
Alinnor IJ (2005) Assessment of elemental contaminants in water and fish samples from Aba River. Environ Monit Assess 102:15–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-005-1011-3
AnvariFar H, Amirkolaie AK, Jalali AM et al (2018) Environmental pollution and toxic substances: cellular apoptosis as a key parameter in a sensible model like fish. Aquat Toxicol 204:144–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquatox.2018.09.010
Atchison GJ, Henry MG, Sandheinrich MB (1987) Effects of metals on fish behavior: a review. Environ Biol Fishes 18:11–25
Ballesteros ML, Bianchi GE, Carranza M, Bistoni MA (2007) Endosulfan acute toxicity and histomorphological alterations in Jenynsia multidentata (Anablepidae, Cyprinodontiformes). J Environ Sci Health Part B 42:351–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/03601230701309577
Bernet D, Schmidt H, Meier W et al (1999) Histopathology in fish: proposal for a protocol to assess aquatic pollution. J Fish Dis 22:25–34. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2761.1999.00134.x
Bonifacio AF, Cazenave J, Bacchetta C et al (2016) Alterations in the general condition, biochemical parameters and locomotor activity in Cnesterodon decemmaculatus exposed to commercial formulations of chlorpyrifos, glyphosate and their mixtures. Ecol Indic 67:88–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.02.011
Bria A, Marda J, Zhou J et al (2017) Hepatic progenitor cell activation in liver repair. Liver Res 1:81–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livres.2017.08.002
Brown C, Laland K, Krause J (2006) Fish cognition and behavior. Blackwell, Oxford
Cox AG, Goessling W (2015) The lure of zebrafish in liver research: regulation of hepatic growth in development and regeneration. Curr Opin Genet Dev 32:153–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gde.2015.03.002
Di Rienzo J, Casanoves F, Balzarini M et al (2018) InfoStat [Internet]. versión 24
Don Xavier ND, Bijoy Nandan S, Jayachandran PR et al (2019) Chronic effects of copper and zinc on the fish, Etroplus suratensis (Bloch, 1790) by continuous flow through (CFT) bioassay. Mar Environ Res 143:141–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marenvres.2018.11.002
Egan RJ, Bergner CL, Hart PC et al (2009) Understanding behavioral and physiological phenotypes of stress and anxiety in zebrafish. Behav Brain 205:38–44
Figueiredo-Fernandes A, Ferreira-Cardoso JV, Garcia-Santos S et al (2007) Histopathological changes in liver and gill epithelium of Nile tilapia, Oreochromis niloticus, exposed to waterborne copper. Pesqui Vet Bras 27:103–109
Filenko OF, Xihua DU, Xulong C, Yugi Z (1988) Distribution of mercury in the tissues of carp and its biological effects. Hydrobiol J 24:64–68
Flores Quintana C (2009) Células cloro en peces teleósteos. Rev Vet 20:57–60
Froese R (2006) Cube law, condition factor and weight–length relationships: history, meta-analysis and recommendations. J Appl Ichthyol 22(4):241–253
Gammons CH, Slotton DG, Gerbrandt B et al (2006) Mercury concentrations of fish, river water, and sediment in the Río Ramis-Lake Titicaca watershed, Peru. Sci Total Environ 368:637–648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2005.09.076
Garnero PL, Monferran MV, González GA et al (2018) Assessment of exposure to metals, As and Se in water and sediment of a freshwater reservoir and their bioaccumulation in fish species of different feeding and habitat preferences. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 163:492–501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.07.023
Garnero PL, Monferran MV, Bistoni MA (2020) Uptake, tissue distribution and elimination in a native fish species Astyanax eigenmanniorum exposed to inorganic mercury. Aquat Toxicol 226:105567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquatox.2020.105567
Gerlai R, Fernandes Y, Pereira T (2009) Zebrafish (Danio rerio) responds to the animated image of a predator: Towards the development of an automated aversive task. Behav Brain Res J 201:318–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2009.03.003
Giari L, Manera M, Dezfuli BS (2008) Histo-cytological responses of Dicentrarchus labrax (L.) following mercury exposure. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 70:400–410. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2007.08.013
Haro JG, Bistoni MA (2007) “Peces de Córdoba,” 1a ed. Córdoba, Argentina
Hinton DE, Lauren DJ (1990) Liver structural alterations accompanying chronic toxicity in fishes: potential biomarkers of exposure. In: Shigart LR (ed) McCarty JF. Biomarkers of environmental contamination, Lewis Publ, pp 15–57
Hirt LM, Domitrovic HA (2002) Toxicity and histopathological response in Cichlasoma dimerus (Pisces, Cichlidae) exposes to mercury dichloride in acute and subletal tests. Rev Ictiol 10:37–52
Kania HJ, O’Hara J (1974) Behavioral alterations in a simple predator–prey system due to sublethal exposure to mercury. Trans Am Fish Soc 103:134–136. https://doi.org/10.1577/1548-8659(1974)103
Leone OL, Valdecantos S, Martínez VH (2018) Histopathological markers of environmental stress in the fish Odonthestes bonariensis (Atheriniformes, Atherinopsidae) in two reservoirs of Argentina. UNED Res J 10:273–282
Levin ED, Bencan Z, Cerutti DT (2007) Anxiolytic effects of nicotine in zebrafish. Physiol Behav 90:54–58
Mallatt J (1985) Fish gill structural changes induced by toxicants and other irritants: a statistical review. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 42:630–648
Mela M, Randi MAF, Ventura DF et al (2007) Effects of dietary methylmercury on liver and kidney histology in the neotropical fish Hoplias malabaricus. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 68:426–435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2006.11.013
Monteiro DA, Rantin FT, Kalinin AL (2010) Inorganic mercury exposure: toxicological effects, oxidative stress biomarkers and bioaccumulation in the tropical freshwater fish matrinxã, Brycon amazonicus (Spix and Agassiz, 1829). Ecotoxicology 19:105–123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-009-0395-1
Muñoz L, Weber P, Dressler V et al (2015) Histopathological biomarkers in juvenile silver catfish (Rhamdia quelen) exposed to a sublethal lead concentration. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 113:241–247
Nero V, Farwell A, Lister A et al (2006) Gill and liver histopathological changes in yellow perch (Perca flavescens) and goldfish (Carassius auratus) exposed to oil sands process-affected water. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 63:365–377. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2005.04.014
Oliveira Ribeiro CA, Guimaraes JRD, Pfeiffer WC (1996) Accumulation and distribution of inorganic mercury in a tropical fish (Trichomycterus zonatus). Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 34:190–195. https://doi.org/10.1006/eesa.1996.0063
Olurin KB, Olojo EAA, Mbaka GO, Akindele AT (2006) Histopathological responses of the gill and liver tissues of Clarias gariepinus fingerlings to the herbicide, glyphosate. African J Biotechnol 5:2480–2487
Polverino G, Liao JC, Porfiri M (2013) Mosquitofish (Gambusia affinis) preference and behavioral response to animated images of conspecifics altered in their color, aspect ratio, and swimming depth. PLoS ONE 8:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0054315
Qin M, Wong A, Seguin D, Gerlai R (2014) Induction of social behavior in zebrafish: live versus computer animated fish as stimuli. Zebrafish 11:185–197. https://doi.org/10.1089/zeb.2013.0969
Rautenberg GE, Amé MV, Monferran MV et al (2014) A multi-level approach using Gambusia affinis as a bioindicator of environmental pollution in the middle-lower basin of Suquía River. Ecol Indic 48:706–720. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.09.025
Rosso JJ (2006) PECES PAMPEANOS: GUÍA Y ECOLOGÍA, L.O.L.A. L. Buenos Aires
Sarmento A, Guilhermino L, Afonso A (2004) Mercury chloride effects on the function and cellular integrity of sea bass (Dicentrarchus labrax) head kidney macrophages. Fish Shellfish Immunol 17:489–498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsi.2004.05.004
Speedie N, Gerlai R (2008) Alarm substance induced behavioral responses in zebrafish (Danio rerio). Behav Brain Res 188:168–177
Stentiford GD, Longshaw M, Lyons BP et al (2003) Histopathological biomarkers in estuarine fish species for the assessment of biological effects of contaminants. Mar Environ Res 55:137–159
Van der Oost R, Beyer J, Vermeulen NPE (2003) Fish bioaccumulation and biomarkers in environmental risk assessment: a review. Environ Toxicol Pharmacol 13:57–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1382-6689(02)00126-6
Vieira LR, Gravato C, Soares AMVM et al (2009) Acute effects of copper and mercury on the estuarine fish Pomatoschistus microps: linking biomarkers to behaviour. Chemosphere 76:1416–1427. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2009.06.005
Vieira C, Morais S, Ramos S et al (2011) Mercury, cadmium, lead and arsenic levels in three pelagic fish species from the Atlantic Ocean: intra- and inter-specific variability and human health risks for consumption. Food Chem Toxicol 49:923–932. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2010.12.016
Vogl C, Grillitsch B, Wytek R et al (1999) Qualification of spontaneous undirected locomotor behavior of fish for sublethal toxicity testing. Part I. Variability of measurement parameters under general test conditions. Environ Toxicol Chem 18:2736–2742
Wang X, Wang WX (2019) The three “B” of fish mercury in China: bioaccumulation, biodynamics and biotransformation. Environ Pollut 250:216–232
Wang J, Feng X, Anderson CWN et al (2012) Remediation of mercury contaminated sites—a review. J Hazard Mater 221–222:1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.04.035
Webber HM, Haines TA (2003) Effects of methylmercury on the predator avoidance behavior of a freshwater forage fish, golden shiner (Notemigonus crysoleucas). Environ Toxicol Chem 22:1556–1561
Wendelaar Bonga SE, Lock RAC (2008) The osmoregulatory system. In: Di Giulio RT, Hinton D (eds) The Toxicology of Fishes, p 1071
Wood CM (2001) Toxic responses of the gill. In: Schlenk D, Benson WH (eds) Target organ toxicity in marine and freshwater teleosts. CRC Press, Boca Raton, p 363
Wu L, Yu Q, Zhang G et al (2019) Single and combined exposures of waterborne Cu and Cd induced oxidative stress responses and tissue injury in female rare minnow (Gobiocypris rarus). Comp Biochem Physiol Part C Toxicol Pharmacol 222:90–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpc.2019.04.013
Acknowledgements
The authors thank the National Scientific and Technical Research Council (CONICET, PIP 112-201101-01084) 461 and the Science and Technology Office (SECYT, 2014–2015. Res no.: 203/14) of the National University of Córdoba (Argentina) for grants and subsidies. We also thank Joaquín Gastaminza for his help during sample measurement with the ICP-MS.
Funding
The authors have not disclosed any funding.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
The authors' contributions are as follows: Paola L. Garnero conducted the laboratory experiments, directed mercury measurements and histological and behavioral data analyses, and wrote the article. María L. Ballesteros collaborated with the behavioral analysis and revision of the manuscript. Magdalena V. Monferran provided expertise in mercury measurements and conceptualization. Natalia G. Rivetti contributed to laboratory tests and data interpretation. María de los Ángeles Bistoni collaborated with the experimental design, conceptualization, and project administration. All authors have read and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate
The use of experimental animals followed the guidelines of the Bioethics and Animal Welfare Committee of the National Scientific and Technical Research Council—Argentina (Res 1047/2005), Argentina. The protocol was approved (Acta 04/2018) by the Institutional Committee for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (CICUAL) of the Institute of Animal Diversity and Ecology (IDEA-CONICET).
Competing interests
The authors state that there are no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Garnero, P.L., Ballesteros, M.L., Monferran, M.V. et al. Multi-biomarker Assessment in a Native Species Psalidodon eigenmanniorum Under Inorganic Mercury and Recovery Scenarios. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 83, 142–154 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00244-022-00946-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00244-022-00946-3