Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Characteristics of Volatile Organic Compounds in Nanjing and Suzhou, Two Urban Sites in the Yangtze River Delta, China

  • Published:
Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A field measurement study of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) was performed in January 2015 in the urban areas of two of the most important cities of the Yangtze River Delta: Nanjing and Suzhou. The objectives of this study included comparing the characteristics of VOC concentrations, comparing the impacts of emissions on VOCs, using species ratios to assess air mass age, and evaluating ozone formation potential (OFP) and secondary organic aerosol formation potential (SOAP) in air masses. The VOC concentrations in Nanjing (34.6 ± 5.8 ppbv) were higher than those of Suzhou (28.1 ± 5.6 ppbv). The most abundant VOC measured was ethane (6.6 ppbv in Nanjing and 3.6 ppbv in Suzhou). Relevant analysis shows that motor vehicle emissions in Suzhou were dominant, whereas industrial emissions in Nanjing also contributed to VOCs. During rush hour, the VOC concentrations in Nanjing were the highest (35.3 ppbv). The T/B ratio (0.92–1.79) for the two sites was observed to be relatively low in the other studied cities, indicating the source impact of traffic emissions in the two sites. Indicators X/B (0.26–0.39) and X/E (0.33–0.66) also confirmed an aging air mass was transported at the two sampling sites. According to principal component factor analysis results, vehicle emissions (44.8% in Nanjing and 30.6% in Suzhou) were the most important contribution to the two sites. Industrial sites were not only likely to experience industrial emissions but were affected by traffic emissions. Using the OFP method, both sites showed the largest percentage of alkenes (59.9% in Nanjing and 62.0% in Suzhou). When comparing SOAP, both sites showed an absolute majority of aromatics (97.6% in Nanjing and 98.3% in Suzhou). To control the formation of O3 and SOA in the two sites, it is necessary to reduce the concentration of alkenes and aromatics, respectively. By CPF analysis, pollutants transported from the SE and NE have significant effects on the Nanjing site. In the Suzhou, roads and industrial parks in the SE and S of Suzhou have significant impacts on the site.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • An JL, Zhu B, Wang HL, Li YY, Lin X, Yang H (2014) Characteristics and source apportionment of VOCs measured in Nanjing of Yangtze River Delta, China. Atmos Environ 97:206–214

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • An JL, Zou JN, Wang JX, Lin X, Zhu B (2015) Differences in ozone photochemical characteristics between the megacity Nanjing and its suburban surroundings, Yangtze River Delta, China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 22(24):19607–19617

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ashbaugh LL, Malm WC, Sadeh WZ (1985) A residence time probability analysis of sulphur concentrations at ground canyon national park. Atmos Environ 19:1263–1270

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson R, Arey J (2003) Atmospheric degradation of volatile organic compounds. Chem Rev 103(12):4605–4638

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barletta B, Meinardi S, Rowland FS, Chan CY, Wang XM, Zou SC, Chan LY, Blake DR (2005) Volatile organic compounds in 43 Chinese cities. Atmos Environ 39(32):5979–5990

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barletta B, Meinardi S, Simpson IJ, Zou SC, Rowland FS, Blake DR (2008) Ambient mixing ratios of nonmethane hydrocarbons (NMHCs) in two major urban centers of the Pearl River Delta (PRD) region: Guangzhou and Dongguan. Atmos Environ 42:4393–4408

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cai CJ, Geng FH, Tie XX, Yu Q, An JL (2010) Characteristics and source apportionment of VOCs measured in Shanghai, China. Atmos Environ 44:5005–5014

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carter WPL (1994) Development of ozone reactivity scales for volatile organic compounds. J Air Waste Manag Assoc 44(7):881–899

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carter WPL (2010) Development of the SAPRC-07 chemical mechanism and updated ozone reactivity scales. http://www.cert.ucr.edu/~carter/SAPRC. Accessed 2 Jan 2020

  • Chen TY, Simpson IJ, Blake DR, Rowland FS (2001) Impact of the leakage of liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) on Santiago air quality. Geophys Res Lett 28:2193–2196

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Deng YY, Li J, Li YQ, Wu RR, Xie SD (2019) Characteristics of volatile organic compounds, NO2, and effects on ozone formation at a site with high ozone level in Chengdu. J Environ Sci 75:334–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derwent RG, Jenkin ME, Utembe SR, Shallcross DE, Murrells TP, Passant NR (2010) Secondary organic aerosol formation from a large number of reactive man-made organic compounds. Sci Total Environ 408(16):3374–3381

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Geng FH, Cai C, Tie X, Yu Q, An J, Peng L, Zhou G, Xu J (2009) Analysis of VOC emissions using PCA/APCS receptor model at city of Shanghai, China. J Atmos Chem 62(3):229–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gentner DR, Harley RA, Miller AM, Goldstein AH (2009) Diurnal and seasonal variability of gasoline-related volatile organic compound emissions in Riverside, California. Environ Sci Technol 43:4247–4252

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Guenther A, Karl T, Harley P, Wiedinmyer C, Palmer PI, Geron C (2006) Estimates of global terrestrial isoprene emissions using MEGAN (Model of Emissions of Gases and Aerosols from Nature). Atmos Chem Phys 6:3181–3210

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Guo H, Wang T, Simpson IJ, Blake DR, Yu XM, Kwok YH, Li YS (2004) Source contributions to ambient VOCs and CO at a rural site in eastern China. Atmos Environ 38(27):4551–4560

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Guo H, Cheng HR, Ling ZH, Louie PKK, Ayoko GA (2011) Which emission sources are responsible for the volatile organic compounds in the atmosphere of Pearl River Delta? J Hazard Mater 188:116–124

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ho KF, Lee SC, Ho WK, Blake DR, Cheng Y, Li YS, Ho SSH, Fung K, Louie PKK, Park D (2009) Vehicular emission of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from a tunnel study in Hong Kong. Atmos Chem Phys 9(19):7491–7504

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson RA, Wichern DW (2008) Applied multivariate statistical analysis, 6th edn. Prentice Hall, Eaglewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim SW, McKeen SA, Frost GA, Lee SH, Trainer M, Richter A, Angevine WA, Atlas E, Bianco L, Boersma KF, Brioude J, Burrows JP, de Gouw J, Fried A, Gleason J, Hilboll A, Mellqvist J, Peischl J, Richter D, Rivera C, Ryerson T, Lintel Hekkert S, Walega J, Warneke C, Weibring P, Williams E (2011) Evaluations of NOx and highly reactive VOC emission inventories in Texas and their implications for ozone plume simulations during the Texas Air Quality Study 2006. Atmos Chem Phys 11(22):11361–11386

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kroll JH, Seinfeld JH (2008) Chemistry of secondary organic aerosol: formation and evolution of low-volatility organics in the atmosphere. Atmos Environ 42:3593–3624

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kwon KD, Jo WK, Lim HJ, Jeong WS (2007) Characterization of emissions composition for selected household products available in Korea. J Hazard Mater 148:192–198

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Leuchner M, Rappenglück B (2010) VOC source-receptor relationships in Houston during TexAQS-II. Atmos Environ 44:4056–4067

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y, Shao M, Lu SH, Chang CC, Wang JL, Chen G (2008) Volatile organic compound (VOC) measurements in the Pearl River Delta (PRD) region, China. Atmos Chem Phys 8(6):1531–1545

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lyu XP, Chen N, Guo H, Zhang WH, Wang N, Wang Y (2016) Ambient volatile organic compounds and their effect on ozone production in Wuhan, central China. Sci Total Environ 541(60):200–209

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy MC, Aklilu YA, Brown SG, Lyder DA (2013) Source apportionment of volatile organic compounds measured in Edmonton, Alberta. Atmos Environ 81(2):504–516

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mo ZW, Shao M, Lu SH, Niu H, Zhou MY, Sun J (2017) Characterization of non-methane hydrocarbons and their sources in an industrialized coastal city, Yangtze River Delta, China. Sci Total Environ 593–594:641–653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohan Rao AM, Pandit GG, Sain P, Sharma S, Krishnamoorthy TM, Nambi KV (1997) Non-methane hydrocarbons in industry locations of Bombay. Atmos Environ 31:1077–1085

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Na K, Kim YP, Moon KC, Moon I, Fung K (2001) Concentrations of volatile organic compounds in an industry area of Korea. Atmos Environ 35:2747–2756

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Na K, Moon KC, Kim YP (2005) Source contribution to aromatic VOC concentration and ozone formation potential in the atmosphere of Seoul. Atmos Environ 39:5517–5524

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson PF, Quigley SM (1983) The m, p-xylenes: ethylbenzene ratio. A technique for estimating hydrocarbon age in ambient atmospheres. Atmos Environ 17:659–662

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ohura T, Amagai T, Fusaya M (2006) Regional assessment of ambient volatile organic compounds in an industry harbor area, Shizuoka, Japan. Atmos Environ 40:238–248

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shao P, An JL, Xin JY, Wu FK, Wang JX, Ji D, Wang Y (2016) Source apportionment of VOCs and the contribution to photochemical ozone formation during summer in the typical industrial area in the Yangtze River Delta, China. Atmos Res 176:64–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sosa ER, Humberto Bravo A, Violeta Mugica A, Pablo Sanchez A, Emma Bueno L, Krupa S (2009) Levels and source apportionment of volatile organic compounds in southwestern area of Mexico City. Environ Pollut 157(3):1038–1044

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • US Environmental Protection Agency (2008) Fuel trends report: gasoline 1995–2005, EPA420-R-08-002

  • Wang XM, Sheng GY, Fu JM, Chan CY, Lee SC, Chan LY, Wang ZS (2002) Urban roadside aromatic hydrocarbons in three cities of the Pearl River Delta, People’s Republic of China. Atmos Environ 36:5141–5148

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Watson JG, Chow JC, Fujita EM (2001) Review of volatile organic compounds source apportionment by chemical mass balance. Atmos Environ 35:1567–1584

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xie Y, Berkowitz CM (2006) The use of positive matrix factorization with conditional probability function in air quality studies: an application to hydrocarbon emissions in Houston, Texas. Atmos Environ 40:3070–3091

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xu ZN, Huang X, Nie W, Chi XG, Xu Z, Zheng LF, Sun P, Ding AJ (2017) Influence of synoptic condition and holiday effects on VOCs and ozone production in the Yangtze River Delta region, China. Atmos Environ 168:112–124

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by grants from the National Key Research and Development Program of China (Nos. 2017YFC0210003, 2016YFA0602003), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 91544229), and the Qing Lan Project. The authors also thank the reviewers for their constructive and valuable comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Junlin An.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOC 70 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

An, J., Su, X., Zhang, Y. et al. Characteristics of Volatile Organic Compounds in Nanjing and Suzhou, Two Urban Sites in the Yangtze River Delta, China. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 78, 416–429 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00244-020-00719-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00244-020-00719-w

Navigation