Advertisement

Pollutant Concentrations and Toxic Effects on the Red Alga Ceramium tenuicorne of Sediments from Natural Harbors and Small Boat Harbors on the West Coast of Sweden

  • Britta Eklund
  • Tomas Hansson
  • Henrik Bengtsson
  • Ann-Kristin Eriksson Wiklund
Article

Abstract

This investigation set out to analyze the toxicity of surface sediments in a number of natural harbors and small boat harbors on the west coast of Sweden. This was done with the growth inhibition method with Ceramium tenuicorne. Also, concentrations of copper (Cu), lead (Pb), zinc (Zn), irgarol, organotin compounds, and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in the sediments were analyzed. The small boat harbors were heavily polluted by Cu, Zn, butyltins, and PAHs, and to a lesser extent by Pb. The Cu, Pb, Zn, and butyltins probably originated from their past and/or present use in antifouling paints, whereas the PAHs probably had multiple sources, including boat motor exhausts. The measured toxicity of the sediment was generally related to their Cu, Zn, and butyltin content, although other toxic substances than those analyzed here probably contributed to the toxicity in some of the harbors. The natural harbor sediments contained less pollutants and were less toxic than the small boat harbor sediments. Nevertheless, our data indicate that the boating pressure today may be high enough to produce toxic effects even in natural harbors in pristine areas. The strongest relationship between toxicity and the major pollutants was obtained when the sediment toxicity was expressed as gram wet weight per liter compared with gram dry weight per liter and gram total organic carbon per liter. Hence, for pollutants that can be elutriated with natural sea water, sediment toxicity expressed as gram wet weight per liter appears preferable.

Keywords

PAHs Fluoranthene Organotin Compound Sediment Toxicity Antifouling Paint 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This investigation was funded by the County Administrative Board of Västra Götaland, the Skagerrak and Kattegatt Water District Authority, and the City of Gothenburg.

References

  1. Alzieu CL, Sanjuan J, Deltreil JP, Borel M (1986) Tin contamination in Arcachon Bay: effects on oyster shell anomalies. Mar Pollut Bull 17:494–498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anon (1995) Public health statement, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, Atlanta, GA http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/ToxProfiles/tp69-c1-b.pdf. Accessed 4 Dec 2015
  3. Anon (1999) Environmental quality criteria—coasts and seas. Report no. 4914. Swedish Environmental Protection Agency, Stockholm Sweden (In Swedish)Google Scholar
  4. Anon (2005) Common implementation strategy for the water framework directive. Environmental quality standards (EQS). Substance data sheet. Priority substance no. 30 tributyltin compounds (TBT-ion) CAS-No. 688-73-3 (36643-28-4). Final version, Brussels, 15 January 2005. https://circabc.europa.eu/sd/d/899759c1-af89-4de4-81bf-488c949887c8/30_Tributyltin_EQSdatasheet_150105.pdf. Accessed 4 Dec 2015
  5. Anon (2007) Revision of classification of metals and organic environmental pollutants in water and sediments. Report TA-2229/2007. Norwegian Pollution Control Authority, Oslo, Norway (in Norwegian) http://www.miljodirektoratet.no/old/klif/publikasjoner/2229/ta2229.pdf. Accessed 4 Dec 2015
  6. Anon (2010) Boat life survey 2010—an investigation of Swedish pleasure boats and their use. Swedish Transport Agency, MIND Research, Sollentuna, Sweden (in Swedish) https://www.transportstyrelsen.se/globalassets/global/sjofart/dokument/fritidsbatar/batlivsundersokningen_2010.pdf. Accessed 4 Dec 2015
  7. Anon (2011) Basis for assessment of environmental pollutants in marine sediments. Mimeo. Swedish Environmental Protection Agency, Stockholm, Sweden (in Swedish)Google Scholar
  8. Anon (2015) Regulations of the Swedish Agency for Marine and Water Management on revision of the regulations of the Swedish Agency for Marine and Water Management (HVMFS 2013:19) on classification and environmental quality standards of surface waters. HVMFS 2015:4. Swedish Agency for Marine and Water Management, Gothenburg, Sweden (in Swedish)Google Scholar
  9. Bangkedphol S, Keenan HE, Davidson C, Sakultantimetha A, Songsasen A (2009) The partition behavior of tributyltin and prediction of environmental fate, persistence and toxicity in aquatic environments. Chemosphere 77:1326–1332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bengtsson H, Cato I (2011) TBT in small boat harbors in The County of Västra Götaland 2010—a study of burden and trends. Report no. 2011:30. County Administrative Board of Västra Götaland, Sweden (In Swedish) https://www.alingsas.se/sites/default/files/tbt_vastra_gotaland.pdf. Accessed 4 Dec 2015
  11. Bengtsson H, Wernersson A-S (2012) TBT, copper, zinc, and irgarol in surface water, sludge, and soil in small boat harbors. Report no. 2012:16. County Administrative Board of Västra Götaland, Sweden (in Swedish) http://www.lansstyrelsen.se/vastragotaland/SiteCollectionDocuments/Sv/publikationer/2012/2012-16.pdf. Accessed 4 Dec 2015
  12. Biselli S, Bester K, Hühnerfuss H, Fent K (2000) Concentrations of the antifouling compound irgarol 1051 and of organotins in water and sediments of German North and Baltic Sea marinas. Mar Pollut Bull 40:233–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brooks SJ, Waldock M (2009) Copper biocides in the marine environment. In: Arai T, Harino H, Ohji M, Langston WJ (eds) Ecotoxicology of antifouling biocides. Springer, Tokyo, pp 413–428CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bruno E, Eklund B (2003) Two new growth inhibition tests with the filamentous algae Ceramium strictum and C. tenuicorne (Rhodophyta). Environ Pollut 125:287–293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bryan GW, Gibbs PE, Hummerstone LG, Burt GR (1986) The decline of the gastropod Nucella lapillus around south-west England: evidence for the effect of tributyltin from antifouling paints. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 66:611–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Castro H, Ramalheira F, Quintino V, Rodrigues AM (2006) Amphipod acute and chronic sediment toxicity assessment in estuarine environmental monitoring: an example from Ria de Aveiro, NW Portugal. Mar Pollut Bull 53:91–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cato I (2003) Organotin compounds in Swedish sediments—an overlooked environmental problem. In: R&D seminar at SGU March 11–12 2003, Documentation. Report 2003:4. Geological Survey of Sweden, Uppsala, Sweden (In Swedish and English)Google Scholar
  18. Cato I, Magnusson M, Granmo Å, Borgegren A (2007) Tinorganic compounds—a threat to life in the sea. In: Viklund K, Tidlund A, Brenner U, Lindblom R (eds) The sea 2007—on the environmental status of Swedish marine areas, Swedish Environmental Protection Agency, pp 77–81 (In Swedish) http://www.havet.nu/dokument/Havet2007.pdf. Accessed 4 Dec 2015
  19. Cornelissen G, Pettersen A, Nesse E, Eek E, Helland A, Breedveld GD (2008) The contribution of urban runoff to organic contaminant levels in harbour sediments near two Norwegian cities. Mar Pollut Bull 56:565–573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Council Directive 76/769/EEC of 27 July 1976 on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to restrictions on the marketing and use of certain dangerous substances and preparationsGoogle Scholar
  21. Council Directive 89/677/EEC of 21 December 1989 amending for the eighth time Directive 76/769/EEC on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to restrictions on the marketing and use of certain dangerous substances and preparationsGoogle Scholar
  22. Diez S, Abalos M, Bayona JM (2002) Organotin contamination in sediments from the Western Mediterranean enclosures following 10 years of TBT regulation. Water Res 36:905–918CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Diez S, Jover E, Albaigés J, Bayona JM (2006) Occurrence and degradation of butyltins and wastewater marker compounds in sediments from Barcelona harbor, Spain. Environ Int 32:858–865CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. DIN ISO 10694 (1996) Soil quality—determination of organic and total carbon after dry combustion (elementary analysis) (ISO 10694:1995). Deutsches Institut für Normung, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  25. EFSA (2004) Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain on a request from the Commission to assess the health risks to consumers associated with exposure to organotins in foodstuffs (Question No. EFSA-Q-2003-110). EFSA J 102:1–119Google Scholar
  26. Eklund B (2005) Development of growth inhibition test with the marine and brackish water red alga Ceramium tenuicorne. Mar Pollut Bull 50:921–930CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Eklund B, Eklund D (2014) Pleasure boatyard soils are often highly contaminated. Environ Manag 53:930–946CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Eklund B, Elfström M, Borg H (2008) Tributyltin originates from pleasure boats in Sweden in spite of firm restrictions. Open Environ Sci 2:124–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Eklund B, Elfström M, Gallego I, Bengtsson B-E, Breitholtz M (2010) Biological and chemical characterization of harbour sediments from the Stockholm area. J Soils Sediments 10:127–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Eklund B, Johansson L, Ytreberg E (2014) Contamination of a boatyard for maintenance of pleasure boats. J Soils Sediments 14:955–967CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Ekman S (1911) Neue Apparate zur qualitativen und quantitativen Erforschung der Bodenfauna der Seen. Int Rev Ges Hydrobiol Hydrogr 3:553–564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Eriksson Wiklund A-K, Vilhelmsson S, Eklund B (2009) Contaminants and habitat choice in the Baltic Sea: behavioural experiments with the native species, Monoporeia affinis, and the invasive genus, Marenzelleria. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 81:238–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Fent K (2006) Worldwide occurrence of organotins from antifouling paints and effects in the aquatic environment. In: Ioannis KK (ed) Handbook of environmental chemistry, vol 5O. Springer, Berlin, pp 71–100Google Scholar
  34. Gabrielsen TM, Brochmann C, Rueness J (2003) Phylogeny and interfertility of North Atlantic populations of ‘Ceramium strictum’ (Ceramiales, Rhodophyta): how many species? Eur J Phycol 38:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hansson T, Åkerman G, Tjärnlund U, Grunder K, Zebühr Y, Sundberg H, Balk L (2007) Chapter 15: results of the biotoxicity measurements. In: Blondel P, Caiti A (eds) Buried waste in the seabed—acoustic imaging and bio-toxicity—results from the European SITAR project. Springer Praxis, Berlin, pp 127–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Harino H, Fukushima M, Yamamoto Y, Kawai S, Miyazaki N (1998) Organotin compounds in water, sediment, and biological samples from the Port of Osaka, Japan. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 35:558–564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hawthorne SB, Grabanski CB, Miller DJ (2006) Measured partitioning coefficients for parent and alkyl polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in 114 historically contaminated sediments: part 1. KOC values. Environ Toxicol Chem 25:2901–2911CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Hoch M (2001) Organotin compounds in the environment: an overview. Appl Geochem 16:719–753CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Horiguchi T, Shiraishi H, Shimizu M, Morita M (1997) Effects of triphenyltin chloride and five other organotin compounds on the development of imposex in the rock shell, Thais clavigera. Environ Pollut 95:85–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. ISO 10710:2010 (2010) Water quality—growth inhibition test with the marine and brackish water macroalga Ceramium tenuicorne. International Organization for Standardization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  41. Jones B, Bolam T (2007) Copper speciation survey from UK marinas, harbours and estuaries. Mar Pollut Bull 54:1127–1138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Konstantinou IK, Albanis TA (2004) Worldwide occurrence and effects of antifouling paint booster biocides in the aquatic environment: a review. Environ Int 30:235–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lüning K (1990) Seaweeds: their environment, biogeography, and ecophysiology. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  44. Lunn I (1974) Antifouling: a brief introduction to the origins and developments of the marine antifouling industry. BCA Publications, Iver Lunn & Co. Ltd, Thame, LondonGoogle Scholar
  45. Magnusson M, Borgegren A, Granmo Å (2005) Investigation of imposex on the Swedish west coast using Nassarius nitidus as a bioindicator species 2005. Swedish Environmental Protection Agency, Contract no 212 0519Google Scholar
  46. Maguire RJ (2000) Review of the persistence, bioaccumulation and toxicity of tributyltin in aquatic environments in relation to Canada’s Toxic Substances Management Policy. Water Qual Res J Can 35:633–679Google Scholar
  47. Matthiessen P, Reed J, Johnson M (1999) Sources and potential effects of copper and zinc concentrations in the estuarine waters of Essex and Suffolk, United Kingdom. Mar Pollut Bull 38:908–920CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. McPherson C, Chapman PM, deBruyn AMH, Cooper L (2008) The importance of benthos in weight of evidence sediment assessments: a case study. Sci Total Environ 394:252–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Method 200.8 (1994) Determination of trace elements in waters and wastes by inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry, Revision 5.4, EMMC Version. US Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OHGoogle Scholar
  50. Method 200.7 (1994) Determination of metals and trace elements in water and wastes by inductively coupled plasma-atomic emission spectrometry, Revision 4.4, EMMC Version. US Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OHGoogle Scholar
  51. Nendza M (2002) Inventory of marine biotest methods for the evaluation of dredged material and sediments. Chemosphere 48:865–883CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Rueness J (1978) Hybridization in red algae. In: Irvine DEG, Price JH (eds) Modern approaches to the taxonomy of red and brown algae. Academic Press, London, pp 247–262Google Scholar
  53. Singh N, Turner A (2009) Trace metals in antifouling paint particles and their heterogeneous contamination of coastal sediments. Mar Pollut Bull 58:559–564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. SS 28113 (1981) Water analyses: determination of dry substance and ignition residue in water, sludge, and sediment. SIS Swedish Standards Institute, Stockholm (In Swedish)Google Scholar
  55. Sternbeck J, Fäldt J, Österås AH (2006) Screening of organotin compounds in the Swedish environment. Report. WSP Environmental, Stockholm, Sweden. http://www.imm.ki.se/Datavard/PDF/Screening%20tennorganiska%20060630.pdf. Accessed 4 Dec 2015
  56. Strand J, Jacobsen JA, Pedersen B, Granmo Å (2003) Butyltin compounds in sediment and molluscs from the shipping strait between Denmark and Sweden. Environ Pollut 124:7–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Takahashi CK, Turner A, Millward GE, Glegg GA (2012) Persistence and metallic composition of paint particles in sediments from a tidal inlet. Mar Pollut Bull 64:133–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Thomas KV, Blake SJ, Waldock MJ (2000) Antifouling paint booster biocide contamination in UK marine sediments. Mar Pollut Bull 40:739–745CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Turner A (2010) Marine pollution from antifouling paint particles. Mar Pollut Bull 60:159–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Turner A (2013) Metal contamination of soils, sediments and dusts in the vicinity of marine leisure boat maintenance facilities. J Soils Sediments 13:1052–1056CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Vindimian E (2001) Excel macro: REGTOX. http://www.normalesup.org/~vindimian/en_download.html. Accessed 4 Dec 2015
  62. Voulvoulis N, Scrimshaw MD, Lester JN (2002) Comparative environmental assessment of biocides used in anti-fouling paints. Chemosphere 47:789–795CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Warnken J, Dunn RJK, Teasdale PR (2004) Investigation of recreational boats as a source of copper at anchorage sites using time-integrated diffusive gradients in thin film and sediment measurements. Mar Pollut Bull 49:833–843CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Yebra DM, Kiil S, Dam-Johansen K (2004) Antifouling technology—past, present and future steps towards efficient and environmentally friendly antifouling coatings. Prog Org Coat 50:75–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Environmental Science and Analytical Chemistry (ACES)Stockholm UniversityStockholmSweden
  2. 2.Environmental Protection DepartmentCounty Administrative Board of Västra GötalandGöteborgSweden

Personalised recommendations