Letter to the Editor


This letter to the editor explains why the results presented in “Crane (Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 66:176–200, Crane 2014)” does not support the hypothesis that refined tar sealers (RTS) are a significant source of PAHs in urban sediments. Additional analysis of Crane’s data indicates that sediment chemistry can be explained in the absence of RTS.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2


  1. Boehm PD (2006) Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). In: Morrison R, Murphy B (eds) Environmental forensics—a contaminant-specific approach. Elsevier, New York, p 315

    Google Scholar 

  2. Crane JL (2014) Source apportionment and distribution of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, risk considerations, and management implications for urban stormwater pond sediments in Minnesota, USA. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 66:176–200

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. DeMott RP, Gauthier TD (2006) Comment on “parking lot sealcoat: an unrecognized source of urban polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons”. Environ Sci Technol 40:3657–3658

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Erceg-Hurn DM, Mirosevich VM (2008) Modern robust statistical methods. Am Psychol 63:591–601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Li A, Jang J-K, Scheff PA (2003) Application of EPA CMB8.2 model for source apportionment of sediment PAHs in Lake Calumet, Chicago. Environ Sci Technol 37:2958–2965

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Mahler BJ, Van Metre PC, Bashara TJ, Wilson JT, Johns DA (2005) Parking lot sealcoat: an unrecognized source of urban polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Environ Sci Technol 39:5560–5566

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Minn. Stat. §116.202 (2013) Coal tar sealant use and sale prohibited

  8. O’Reilly KT, Pietari J, Boehm PD (2012) A forensic assessment of coal tar sealants as a source of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in urban sediments. Environ Forensics 13:185–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. O’Reilly KT, Pietari J, Boehm PD (2014a) Parsing pyrogenic PAHs: forensic chemistry, receptor models, and source control policy. Integ Environ Assess Manag 10:279–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. O’Reilly KT, Ahn S, Pietari J, Boehm PD (2014b) Use of receptor models to evaluate sources of PAHs. Polycycl Aromat Compd J. doi:10.1080/10406638.2014.907817

    Google Scholar 

  11. Van Metre PC, Mahler BJ (2010) Contribution of PAHs from coal–tar pavement sealcoat and other sources to 40 U.S. lakes. Sci Tot Environ 409:334–344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Van Metre PC, Mahler BJ, Wilson JT, Burbank TL (2008) Collection and analysis of samples for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in dust and other solids related to sealed and unsealed pavement from 10 cities across the United States, 2005–07. U S Geol Surv Data Ser, 361

Download references


Kirk O’Reilly has received funding from the Pavement Coatings Technology Council.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kirk O’Reilly.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

O’Reilly, K. Letter to the Editor. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 68, 1–3 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00244-014-0094-7

Download citation


  • PAHs
  • Source Input
  • Principal Component Analysis Plot
  • Source Profile
  • Chemical Mass Balance