Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Assessment of Nonlethal Methods for Predicting Muscle Tissue Mercury Concentrations in Coastal Marine Fishes

  • Published:
Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Caudal fin clips and dorsolateral scales were analyzed as a potential nonlethal approach for predicting muscle tissue mercury (Hg) concentrations in marine fish. Target fish were collected from the Narragansett Bay (Rhode Island, USA) and included black sea bass Centropristis striata [n = 54, 14–55 cm total length (TL)], bluefish Pomatomus saltatrix (n = 113, 31–73 cm TL), striped bass Morone saxatilis (n = 40, 34–102 cm TL), summer flounder Paralichthys dentatus (n = 64, 18–55 cm TL), and tautog Tautoga onitis (n = 102, 27–61 cm TL). For all fish species, Hg concentrations were greatest in muscle tissue [mean muscle Hg = 0.47–1.18 mg/kg dry weight (dw)] followed by fin clips (0.03–0.09 mg/kg dw) and scales (0.01–0.07 mg/kg dw). The coefficient of determination (R 2) derived from power regressions of intraspecies muscle Hg against fin and scale Hg ranged between 0.35 and 0.78 (mean R 2 = 0.57) and 0.14–0.37 (mean R 2 = 0.30), respectively. The inclusion of fish body size interaction effects in the regression models improved the predictive ability of fins (R 2 = 0.63–0.80; mean = 0.71) and scales (R 2 = 0.33–0.71; mean = 0.53). According to the high level of uncertainty within the regression models (R 2 values) and confidence interval widths, scale analysis was deemed an ineffective tool for estimating muscle tissue Hg concentrations in the target species. In contrast, the examination of fin clips as predictors of muscle Hg had value as a cursory screening tool; however, this method should not be the foundation for developing human consumption advisories. It is also noteworthy that the efficacy of these nonlethal techniques was highly variable across fishes and likely depends on species-specific life-history characteristics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baker RF, Blanchfield PJ, Paterson MJ, Flett RJ, Wesson L (2004) Evaluation of nonlethal methods for the analysis of mercury in fish tissue. Trans Am Fish Soc 133:568–576

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Balcom P, Fitzgerald W, Vandal G, Lamborg C, Rolfhus K, Langer C et al (2004) Mercury sources and cycling in the Connecticut River and Long Island Sound. Mar Chem 90:53–74

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bloom NS (1992) On the chemical form of mercury in edible fish and marine invertebrate tissue. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 49:1010–1017

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Červenka R, Bednařik A, Komárek J, Ondračkova M, Jurajda P, Víek T et al (2011) The relationship between the mercury concentration in fish muscles and scales/fins and its significance. Cent Eur J Chem 9:1109–1116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen C, Amirbahman A, Fisher N, Harding G, Lamborg C, Nacci D et al (2008) Methylmercury in marine ecosystems: spatial patterns and processes of production, bioaccumulation, and biomagnification. Ecohealth 5:399–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collette BB, Klein-MacPhee G (2002) Bigelow and Schroeder’s fishes of the Gulf of Maine, 3rd edn. Smithsonian, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Drohan AF, Manderson JP, Packer DB (2006) Essential fish habitat source document: black sea bass, Centropristis striata, life history and habitat characteristics, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Technical Memorandum, 2nd edn. NOAA/National Marine Fisheries Service-NE-200, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Gremillion P, Cizdziel J, Cody N (2005) Caudal fin mercury as a non-lethal predictor of fish—muscle mercury. Environ Chem 2:96–99

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton S, Holley Buhl K, Bullard F, Weston L, McDonald S (2002) Impact of selenium and other trace elements on the endangered razorback sucker. Environ Toxicol 17:297–323

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hightower JM, Moore D (2003) Mercury levels in high-end consumers of fish. Environ Health Perspect 111:1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Kannan K, Smith R, Lee R, Windom H, Heitmuller P, Macauley J et al (1998) Distribution of total mercury and methylmercury in water, sediment, and fish from South Florida estuaries. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 34:109–118

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lake J, Ryba S, Serbst J, Libby A (2006) Mercury in fish scales as an assessment method for predicting muscle tissue mercury concentrations in largemouth bass. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 50:539–544

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Osmundson B, May T, Osmundson DB (2000) Selenium concentrations in the Colorado pikeminnow (Ptychocheilus lucius): relationship with flows in the upper Colorado River. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 38:479–485

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Packer DB, Griesbach SJ, Berrien PL, Zetlin CA, Johnson DL, Morse WW (1999) Essential fish habitat source document: summer flounder, Paralichthys dentatus, life history and habitat characteristics, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Technical Memorandum. NOAA/National Marine Fisheries Service-NE-151, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne EJ, Taylor DL (2010) Effects of diet composition and trophic structure on mercury bioaccumulation in temperate flatfishes. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 58:431–443

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson SA, Van Sickle J, Hughes RM, Schacher JA, Echols SF (2005) A biopsy procedure for determining filet and predicting whole-fish mercury concentration. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 48:99–107

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Piraino M, Taylor D (2009) Bioaccumulation and trophic transfer of mercury in striped bass (Morone saxatilis) and tautog (Tautoga onitis) from the Narragansett Bay (Rhode Island, USA). Mar Environ Res 69:117–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rolfhus K, Sandheinrich M, Wiener J, Bailey S, Thoreson K, Hammerschmidt C (2008) Analysis of fin as a nonlethal method for monitoring mercury in fish. Environ Sci Tech 42:871–877

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ryba SA, Lake JL, Serbst JR, Libby AD, Ayvazian S (2008) Assessment of caudal fin clip as a non-lethal technique for predicting muscle tissue mercury concentrations in largemouth bass. Environ Chem 5:200–203

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt CJ, Brumbaugh WG (2007) Evaluation of potentially nonlethal sampling methods for monitoring mercury concentrations in smallmouth bass (Micropterus dolomieu). Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 53:84–95

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Secor DH, Piccoli PM (2007) Oceanic migration rates of upper Chesapeake Bay striped bass (Morone saxatilis) determined by otolith microchemical analysis. Fish Bull 105:62–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Shepherd GR, Packer DB (2006) Essential fish habitat source document: bluefish, Pomatomus saltatrix, life history and habitat characteristics, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Technical Memorandum. NOAA/National Marine Fisheries Service-NE-198 NOACC, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith TR, Buckley LJ (2003) RNA–DNA ratio in scales from juvenile cod provides a nonlethal measure of feeding condition. Trans Am Fish Soc 132:9–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steimle FW, Shaheen PA (1999) Essential fish habitat source document: Tautog (Tautoga onitis) life history and habitat requirement, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Technical Memorandum. NOAA/National Marine Fisheries Service-NE-118, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Steimle FW, Zetlin CA, Berrien PL, Chang S (1999) Essential fish habitat source document: black sea bass, Centropristis striata, life history and habitat characteristics, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Technical Memorandum. NOAA/National Marine Fisheries Service-NE-143, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Szczebak JT, Taylor DL (2011) Ontogenetic patterns in bluefish (Pomatomus saltatrix feeding ecology and the effect on mercury biomagnification. Environ Toxicol Chem 60:1447–1458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tringali MD, Leber KM, Halstead WG, McMichael R, O’Hop J, Winner B et al (2008) Marine stock enhancement in Florida: a multi-disciplinary, stakeholder-supported, accountability-based approach. Rev Fish Sci 16:51–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) (1997) Mercury study report to congress, volumes I–VII: fate and transport of mercury in the environment EPA-452/R-97-005. USEPA, Washington

  • United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) (1998) Mercury in solids and solutions by thermal decompression, amalgamation, and atomic absorption spectrophotometry EPA Method 7473 Report. USEPA, Washington

  • United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) (2002) EPA-821-C-02-003. USEPA, Washington

  • Valová Z, Hudcová H, Roche K, Svobodová J, Bernardová I, Jurajda P (2013) No relationship found between mercury and lead concentrations in muscle and scales of chub Squalius cephalus L. Environ Monit Assess 185:3359–3368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wells BK, Thorrold SR, Jones CM (2003) Stability of elemental signatures in the scales of spawning weakfish Cynoscion regalis. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 60:361–369

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

We are grateful to E. Payne, J. Szczebak, J. Linehan, S. Helming, L.F. Ho, M. Gardner, N. Ares, N. Kutil, G. LeBlanc and B. Bourque (Roger Williams University, Bristol, RI) for assistance in sample collection and preparation. The project described was supported by the Roger Williams University Foundation Fund Based Research Grant and by Award P20RR016457 from the National Center for Research Resources. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Center for Research Resources or the National Institutes of Health.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David L. Taylor.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Piraino, M.N., Taylor, D.L. Assessment of Nonlethal Methods for Predicting Muscle Tissue Mercury Concentrations in Coastal Marine Fishes. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 65, 715–723 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00244-013-9946-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00244-013-9946-9

Keywords

Navigation