Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of Water Contamination on Site Selection by Amphibians: Experiences from an Arena Approach With European Frogs and Newts

  • Published:
Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Pesticide residues in breeding ponds can cause avoidance by at least some amphibian species. So far, outdoor experiments have been performed only with artificial pools in areas where the focus species usually occur and new colonization has been observed. Results of this kind of study are potentially influenced by natural disturbances and therefore are of limited comparability. We used an easily manufactured and standardizable arena approach, in which animals in reproductive condition for some hours had a choice among pools with different concentrations of a contaminant. Because there has been much debate on the potential environmental impacts of glyphosate-based herbicides, we investigated the impact of glyphosate isopropylamine salt (GLY-IS), Roundup LB PLUS (RU-LB-PLUS), and glyphosate’s main metabolite aminomethylphosphonic acid (AMPA) on individual residence time in water. The following European amphibian species were tested: Common frog (Rana temporaria), Palmate newt (Lissotriton helveticus), and Alpine newt (Ichthyosaura alpestris). The residence time in water was not significantly affected by concentrations below or slightly above the European Environmental Quality Standards for AMPA or the German “worst-case” expected environmental concentrations for GLY-IS and RU-LB-PLUS. Occasionally, microclimatic cofactors (nightly minimum ground temperature, water temperature) apparently influenced the residence time. The major drawback of such quick behavior studies is that results can only be transferred to perception and avoidance of contaminated water but not easily to site selection by amphibians. For example, testing oviposition site selection requires more natural water bodies and more time. Hence, to develop a standard procedure in risk assessment, an intermediate design between an arena approach, as presented here, and previously performed field studies should be tested.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Battaglin WA, Rice KC, Focazio MJ, Salmons S, Barry RX (2009) The occurrence of GLY, atrazine, and other pesticides in vernal pools and adjacent streams in Washington, DC, Maryland, Iowa, and Wyoming, 2005–2006. Environ Monitor Assess 155:281–307

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boone MD, Cowman D, Davidson C, Hayes T, Hopkins W, Relyea R, Schiesari L, Semlitsch R (2007) Evaluating the role of environmental contaminants in amphibian population declines. In: Gascon C, Collins JP, Moore RD, Church DR, McKay JE, Mendelson JR III (eds) Amphibian conservation action plan. IUCN/SSC Amphibian Specialist Group, Gland and Cambridge, pp 32–35

  • Browner CM (1994) The administration’s proposals. EPA J 20:6–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Bundesamt für Verbraucherschutz und Lebensmittelsicherheit (BVL) (2010) Glyphosate—Comments from Germany on the paper by Paganelli, A. et al. (2010) Glyphosate-based herbicides produce teratogenic effects on vertebrates by impairing retinoic acid signaling. BVL, Braunschweig, Germany, pp 1–8

  • Carey S, Crk T, Flaherty C, Hurley P, Hetrick J, Moore K, et al. (2008) Risk of glyphosate use to federally threatened California red-legged frog (Rana aurora draytonii). United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) Environmental Fate and Effects Division, Washington, DC

  • Cauble K, Wagner RS (2005) Sublethal effects of the herbicide glyphosate on amphibian metamorphosis and development. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 75:429–435

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Coupe RH, Kalkhoff SJ, Capel PD, Gregoire C (2012) Fate and transport of glyphosate and aminomethylphosphonic acid in surface waters of agricultural basins. Pest Manag Sci 68:16–30

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson C (2004) Declining downwind: Amphibian population declines in California and historical pesticide use. Ecol Appl 14:1892–1902

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson C, Shaffer HB, Jennings MR (2002) Spatial tests of the pesticide drift, habitat destruction, UV-B, and climate-change hypotheses for California amphibian declines. Conserv Biol 16:1588–1601

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dinehart SK, Smith LM, McMurry ST, Anderson TA, Smith PN, Haukos DA (2009) Toxicity of a glufosinate- and several glyphosate-based herbicides to juvenile amphibians from the Southern High Plains, USA. Sci Total Environ 407:1065–1071

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Duellman WE, Trueb L (1986) Biology of amphibians. John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD

    Google Scholar 

  • Duke SO, Powles SB (2008) Glyphosate: a once-in-a-century herbicide. Pest Manag Sci 64:319–325

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Everitt B, Howell D (2005) Encyclopedia of statistics in behavioral science. Wiley, New York, NY

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fuentes L, Moore LJ, Rodgers JH Jr, Bowerman WW, Yarrow GK, Chao WY (2011) Comparative toxicity of two glyphosate formulations (original formulation of Roundup® and Roundup WeatherMAX®) to six North American larval anurans. Environ Toxicol Chem 30:2756–2761

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gertzog BJ, Kaplan LJ, Nichols D, Smith GR, Rettig JE (2010) Avoidance of three herbicide formulations by Eastern red-backed salamanders (Plethodon cinereus). Herp Conserv Biol 6:237–241

    Google Scholar 

  • Giesy JP, Dobson S, Solomon KR (2000) Ecotoxicological risk assessment for Roundup® herbicide. Rev Environ Contam Toxicol 167:35–120

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hopey ME, Petranka JW (1994) Restriction of wood frogs to fishfree habitats: how important is adult choice? Copeia 1994:1023–1025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houlahan JE, Findlay CS, Schmidt BR, Meyer AH, Kuzmin SL (2000) Quantitative evidence for global amphibian population declines. Nature 404:752–755

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Howe CM, Berrill M, Pauli BD, Helbing CC, Werry K, Veldhoen N (2004) Toxicity of glyphosate-based pesticides to four North American frog species. Environ Toxicol Chem 23:1928–1938

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jones DK, Hammond JI, Relyea RA (2010) Roundup® and amphibians: the importance of concentration, application time, and stratification. Environ Toxicol Chem 29:2016–2025

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Keen WH (1982) Habitat selection and interspecific competition in two species of plethodontid salamanders. Ecology 63:94–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landler L, Gollmann G (2011) Magnetic orientation of the common toad: establishing an arena approach for adult anurans. Front Zool 8:6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mann RM, Bidwell JR (1999) The toxicity of glyphosate and several glyphosate formulations to four species of southwestern Australian frogs. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 36:193–199

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Perkins PJ, Boermans HJ, Stephenson GR (2000) Toxicity of glyphosate and triclopyr using the frog embryo teratogenesis assay-Xenopus. Environ Toxicol Chem 19:940–945

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team (2009) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R foundation for statistical computing. R Development Core Team, Vienna

    Google Scholar 

  • Relyea RA (2005) The lethal impact of Roundup® on aquatic and terrestrial amphibians. Ecol Appl 15:1118–1124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Relyea R, Hoverman JT (2006) Assessing the ecology in ecotoxicology: a review and synthesis in freshwater systems. Ecol Lett 9:1157–1171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Relyea RA, Jones DK (2009) The toxicity of Roundup OriginalMAX® to 13 species of larval amphibians. Environ Toxicol Chem 28:2004–2008

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Resetarits WJ Jr, Wilbur HM (1991) Calling site choice by Hyla chrysoscelis: effect of predators, competitors, and oviposition sites. Ecology 72:778–786

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rueppel ML, Brightwell BB, Schaefer J, Marvel JT (1977) Metabolism and degradation of glyphosate in soil and water. J Agric Food Chem 25:517–528

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schlüpmann M, Günther R (1996) Grasfrosch—Rana temporaria LINNAEUS, 1758. In: Günther R (ed) Die Amphibien und Reptilien Deutschlands. Gustav Fischer, Jena, pp 412–454

    Google Scholar 

  • Skark C, Zullei-Seibert N, Schottler U, Schlett C (1998) The occurrence of glyphosate in surface water. Int J Environ Anal Chem 70:93–104

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smith GR, Todd A, Rettig JE, Nelson F (2003) Microhabitat selection by Northern cricket frogs (Acris crepitans) along a west-central Missouri creek: field and experimental observations. J Herpetol 37:383–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith PN, Cobb GP, Godard-Codding C, Hoff D, McMurry ST, Rainwater TR, Reynolds KD (2007) Contaminant exposure in terrestrial vertebrates. Environ Pollut 150:41–64

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Struger J, Thompson D, Staznik B, Martin P, McDaniel T, Marvin C (2008) Occurrence of glyphosate in surface waters of Southern Ontario. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 80:378–384

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stuart SN, Hoffmann M, Chanson JS, Cox NA, Berridge RJ, Ramani P et al (2008) Threatened amphibians of the world. Lynx Editions, Barcelona

    Google Scholar 

  • Takahashi M (2007) Oviposition site selection: pesticide avoidance by gray treefrogs. Environ Toxicol Chem 26:1476–1480

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vonesh RJ, Buck JC (2007) Pesticide alters oviposition site selection by bray treefrogs. Oecologia 154:219–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vonesh RJ, Kraus JM (2009) Pesticide alters habitat selection and aquatic community composition. Oecologia 160:379–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wells KD (1977) The social behaviour of anuran amphibians. Anim Behav 25:666–693

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winkler C, Heunisch G (1997) Fotografische Methoden der Individualerkennung bei Bergmolch (Triturus alpestris) und Fadenmolch (Triturus helveticus) (Urodela, Salamandridae). In: Henle K, Veith M (eds) Naturschutzrelevante Methoden der Feldherpetologie. Deutsche Gesellschaft für Herpetologie und Terrarienkunde, Rheinbach, pp 71–77

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Permissions to conduct the experiments were obtained by the Landesuntersuchungsamt (Koblenz, Germany) and the Struktur und Genehmigungsdirektion Nord (Koblenz, Germany). N. W. is grateful for financial support from the Graduiertenkolleg at Trier University, which was funded by the German Research Foundation. We are grateful to Willy Werner and Frank Thomas for creating the testing area at the Department of Geobotany, Trier University, available to us. Rainer Ruff and Theresa Scheuren helped with observations and construction of the arenas. Ulrich Schulte helped with frog and newt collecting. Furthermore, we are grateful to Bernd Fontaine for technical support and to Kate Pond for improving the language of the manuscript. Axel Hochkirch, Katharina Wollenberg Vallero, and Michael Veith provided important discussion on the study design and analyses.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Norman Wagner.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wagner, N., Lötters, S. Effects of Water Contamination on Site Selection by Amphibians: Experiences from an Arena Approach With European Frogs and Newts. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 65, 98–104 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00244-013-9873-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00244-013-9873-9

Keywords

Navigation