Skip to main content
Log in

Observations on the Estrogenic Activity and Concentration of 17β-Estradiol in the Discharges of 12 Wastewater Treatment Plants in Southern Australia

  • Published:
Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There is very little information on the overall level of estrogenic activity, or concentrations of specific hormonal compounds in wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) discharges in Australia, compared with Europe, Japan, and North America. To partly address this, in 2004, water samples were collected as “grab” or “spot” samples from 12 WWTP facilities across southern Victoria at the point at which effluent enters the environment, either as recycled water or direct discharge to the receiving water. The WWTPs were of a variety of treatment types and served a diverse range of rural and regional municipalities. For instance, of the 12 WWTPs, 3 served municipalities with populations greater than 100,000, 4 with populations between 20,000 and 100,000, and 5 with populations less than 5,000. The principal treatment process in six was an activated sludge system, and three were trickle-filter-based systems. The remaining plants fall into a “miscellaneous” category, each plant having a mixture of treatment processes within the overall systems. The estrogenic activity and 17β-estradiol concentrations of the samples were assessed using a yeast-based, in vitro reporter gene assay and enzyme-linked immunosorbant assays, respectively. Most of the effluents showed estrogenic activity in the assays (hER, no response: 7.9 ng/L EEQ; mER, no response: 44.5 ng/L EEQ). There was no correlation between estrogenic response and the results of a concurrent toxicity assay, suggesting that a lack of bioassay response was related to lack of estrogenic compounds, rather than the direct toxic effect of the sample. Estradiol concentrations were for the most part in the range 2–5 ng/L, with one sample at 18 ng/L. Despite the assurance our results might provide (of minimal impact in most cases if there is significant dilution), there is still a need for further extensive on-ground reassurance research to provide data for higher-level risk assessment by industry and government agencies. In particular, more research is warranted to verify the estrogenic activity and to expand the range of specific hormone/metabolites reported in these studies. Moreover, studies are required to determine if the estrogenic activity reported in this and other recent Australian studies is sufficient to induce a physiological effect in exposed aquatic organisms, especially Australian native fish.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allinson G, Allinson M, Salzman S et al (2007) Hormones in recycled water. Final Report. Department of Primary Industries, Queenscliff, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Auriol M, Filali-Meknassi Y, Tyagi RD, Adams CD, Surampalli RY (2006) Endocrine disrupting compounds removal from wastewater, a new challenge. Process Biochem 41:525–539. doi:10.1016/j.procbio.2005.09.017

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Braga O, Smythe GA, Schafer AI, Feitz AJ (2005a) Fate of steroid estrogens in Australian inland and coastal wastewater treatment plants. Environ Sci Technol 39:3351–3358. doi:10.1021/es0501767

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Braga O, Smythe GA, Schafer AI, Feltz AJ (2005b) Steroid estrogens in primary and tertiary wastewater treatment plants. Water Sci Technol 52:273–278

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman H (2003) Removal of endocrine disruptors by tertiary treatments and constructed wetlands in subtropical Australia. Water Sci Technol 47:151–156

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Colborn T, Dumanoski D, Myers JP (1996) Our stolen future: “Are we threatening our fertility, intelligence and survival? A Scientific Detective Story”. Dutton, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Fotsis T, Adlerkreutz H (1987) The multicomponent analysis of estrogens in urine by ion exchange chromatographic and GC-MS-I. Quantification of estrogens after initial hydrolysis of conjugates. J Steroid Biochem 28:203–213. doi:10.1016/0022-4731(87)90379-7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fotsis T, Jarvenpaa P, Adlerkreutz H (1980) Purification of urine for quantification of the complete estrogen profile. J Steroid Biochem 12:503–508. doi:10.1016/0022-4731(80)90314-3

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hintemann T, Schneider C, Scholer HF, Schneider RJ (2006) Field study using two immunoassays for the determination of estradiol and ethinylestradiol in the aquatic environment. Water Res 40:2287–2294. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2006.04.028

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hogan A, Peck M, van Dam R, Kennett R (2005) Screening for endocrine disrupting activity in surface waters of Kakadu National Park. Ecol Manage Restor 6:219–221. doi:10.1111/j.1442-8903.2005.239-4.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson AC, Belfroid A, Di Corcia A (2000) Estimating steroid oestrogen inputs into activated sludge treatment works and observations on their removal from the effluent. Sci Total Environ 256:163–173. doi:10.1016/S0048-9697(00)00481-2

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson AC, Sumpter JP (2001) Removal of endocrine-disrupting chemicals in activated sludge treatment works. Environ Sci Technol 35:4697–4703. doi:10.1021/es010171j

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Khan SJ, Wintgens T, Sherman P, Zaricky J, Schäfer AI (2004) Removal of hormones and pharmaceuticals in the Advanced Water Recycling Demonstration Plant in Queensland, Australia. Water Sci Technol 50:15–22

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kinneberg K (2003) Evaluation of in vitro assays for determination of estrogenic activity in the environment. Danish Environmental Protection Agency Report No. 43

  • Leusch FDL, Chapman HF, Korner W, Gooneratne SR, Tremblay LA (2005) Efficacy of an advanced sewage treatment plant in southeast Queensland, Australia, to remove estrogenic chemicals. Environ Sci Technol 39:5781–5786. doi:10.1021/es0484303

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Leusch FDL, Chapman H, van der Heuvel MR, Tan BLL, Gooneratne SR, Tremblay LA (2006) Bioassay-derived androgenic and estrogenic activity in municipal sewage in Australia and New Zealand. Ecotox Environ Safety 65:403–411. doi:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2005.07.020

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Manning T (2005) Endocrine-disrupting chemicals: a review of the state of the science. Aust J Ecotox 11:1–52

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Matsui S, Takigami H, Matsuda T et al (2000) Estrogen and estrogen mimics contamination in water and the role of sewage treatment. Water Sci Technol 42:173–179

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Matthiessen P, Arnold D, Johnson AC, Pepper TJ, Pottinger TG, Pulman KGT (2006) Contamination of headwater streams in the United Kingdom by oestrogenic hormones from livestock farms. Sci Total Environ 367:616–630. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2006.02.007

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mispagel C, Shiraishi F, Allinson M, Allinson G (2005) Estrogenic activity of treated municipal effluent from seven sewage treatment plants in Victoria, Australia. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 74:853–856. doi:10.1007/s00128-005-0659-2

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Morozova VS, Levashova AI, Eremin SA (2005) Determination of pesticides by enzyme immunoassay. J Anal Chem 60:202–217. doi:10.1007/s10809-005-0075-0

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rutishauser BV, Pesonen M, Escher BI et al (2004) Comparative analysis of estrogenic activity in sewage treatment plant effluents involving in vitro assays and chemical analysis of steroids. Environ Toxicol Chem 23:857–864. doi:10.1897/03-286

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sarmah AK, Northcott GL, Leusch FDL, Tremblay LA (2006) A survey of endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) in municipal sewage and animal waste effluents in the Waikato region of New Zealand. Sci Total Environ 355:135–144. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2005.02.027

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Svenson A, Allard AS, Ek M (2003) Removal of estrogenicity in Swedish municipal sewage treatment plants. Water Res 37:4433–4443. doi:10.1016/S0043-1354(03)00395-6

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tilton F, Benson WH, Schlenk D (2002) Evaluation of estrogenic activity from a municipal wastewater treatment plant with predominantly domestic input. Aquat Toxicol 61:211–224. doi:10.1016/S0166-445X(02)00058-9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • WHO/IPCS (2002) Global assessment of the state-of-the-science of endocrine disruptors. In: Damstra T, Barlow S, Bergman A, Kavlock R, Van Der Kraak G (eds) World Health Organisation/International Program on Chemical Safety, Geneva. Available from http://www.who.int/ipcs/publications/new_issues/endocrine_disruptors/en/

  • Ying G-G, Kookana RS, Ru Y-J (2002) Occurrence and fate of hormone steroids in the environment. Environ Int 28:545–551. doi:10.1016/S0160-4120(02)00075-2

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ying G-G, Kookana RS, Waite TD (2004) Endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) and pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PCPPs) in reclaimed water in Australia. Australian Water Conservation and Reuse Research Program, Australian Water Association and CSIRO, Adelaide

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The research was in part supported by the Australian Research Council (Discovery Grant No. DP0343410), the Victorian Water Trust (Project No. 33 V-4000), and the Department of Primary Industries (Project Nos. 08271, 08280, and 06889). The project team gives its thanks to all of the Victorian water authorities, who, in one way or another, contributed to the success of this project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. Allinson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mispagel, C., Allinson, G., Allinson, M. et al. Observations on the Estrogenic Activity and Concentration of 17β-Estradiol in the Discharges of 12 Wastewater Treatment Plants in Southern Australia. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 56, 631–637 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00244-008-9261-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00244-008-9261-z

Keywords

Navigation