Skip to main content

A Bayesian Approach to Probabilistic Risk Assessment in Municipal Playgrounds

Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology volume 56, pages 165–172 (2009)Cite this article

Abstract

A Bayesian risk assessment of the exposure of children up to 6 years of age to trace elements in the sandy substrate of municipal playgrounds in Madrid, Spain was carried out. As a first step, exposure variables and parameters were borrowed from US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) databases. However, the use of these non-site-specific exposure data introduced a high arbitrariness in the assumed distributions, which, in the Bayes approach, translates into a high uncertainty for those distributions that is also reflected in the risk outcome. In order to reduce this uncertainty, site-specific values for children’s body weight and exposure frequency were determined from three surveys of 75, 56, and 34 individuals, respectively, carried out in randomly selected playgrounds in Madrid. This information was used in a Bayesian approach to modify the prior distributions of exposure frequency and body weight adapted from the literature. As a result, the predictive distributions of risk values for arsenic and mercury presented a reduced arbitrariness and a significantly lower uncertainty than those obtained either from the prior distributions borrowed from the US EPA or from the limited data gathered in Madrid separately.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Access options

Buy single article

Instant access to the full article PDF.

43,34 €

Price includes VAT (Finland)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

References

  • Aldenberg T, Jaworska JS (2000) Uncertainty of the Hazardous concentration and fraction affected for normal species sensitivity distributions. Ecotoxicol Environ Safety 46:1–18

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson E, Browne N, Duletsky S, Ramig J, Warn T (1989) Development of statistical distributions or ranges of standard factors used in exposure assessments. EPA/600/S8–85/010. US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchardt-Boyd H, Pedersen F, Cohr KH et al (1999) Exposure scenarios and guidance values for urban soil pollutants. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 30:197–208

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • CCME (Canadian Council of Ministers of Environment) (1996) A protocol for the derivation of environmental and human health soil quality guidelines. Report No. CCME-EPC 101E. CCME, Winnipeg, Manitota

  • CDRH (Center for Devices and Radiological Health) (2006) Draft guidance for industry and FDA staff: guidance for the use of Bayesian statistics in medical device clinical trials. US Department of Health and Human Services. Food and Drug Administration, Rockville, MD

  • CONCAWE (European Association for Environment, Health and Safety in Refining and Distribution) (1997) European oil industry guideline for risk-based assessment of contaminated sites. Report No. 2/97. The Oil Companies European Organisation for Environment, Health and Safety, Brussels

  • De Miguel E, Iribarren I, Chacón E, Ordoñez A, Charlesworth S (2007) Risk-based evaluation of the exposure of children to trace elements in playgrounds in Madrid (Spain). Chemosphere 66:505–513

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • DEFRA (UK Department for Environment, Food, Rural Affairs) (2002) The contaminated land exposure assessment (CLEA) model: technical basis and algorithms. R&D publication CLR 10. UK Environment Agency, London

    Google Scholar 

  • ECB (European Chemical Bureau) (2007) European Chemical Substances Information System (ESIS). Available from http://www.ecb.jrc.it/esis/

  • Englehardt JD (2004) Predictive Bayesian dose-response assessment for appraising absolute health risk from available information. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 10:69–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans E, Ma M, Kingston L, Leharne S (1992) The speciation pattern of lead in the vicinity of two London schools. Environ Int 18:153–162

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman D (2004) Extrapolation in risk assessment: improving the quantificationof uncertainty, and improving information to reduce the uncertainty. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 8:177–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen MM, Hurwitz WN (1943) On the theory of sampling from finite populations. Ann Math Statist 14:333–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hemond HF, Solo-Gabriele HM (2004) Children’s exposure to Arsenic from CCA-treated wooden decks and playground structures. Risk Anal 24:51–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Instituto Nacional de Meteorología (2004) Precipitación anual: Madrid. Available from http://www.inm.es/web/index.html

  • Iribarren I, Callaba A, De Miguel E, Aguilar A, Fdez-Canteli P (2005) Determinación de Niveles Genéricos de Referencia para protección de la salud humana de metales pesados y otros elementos traza en suelos de la Comunidad de Madrid. Inedit. Madrid (in Spanish)

  • Katki HA (2006) Effect of misreported family history on mendelian mutation prediction models. Biometrics 62:478–487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morales KH, Ibrahim JG, Chen Ch-J, Ryan LM (2006) Bayesian model averaging with applications to benchmark dose estimation for arsenic in drinking water. J Am Statist Assoc 101:9–17

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nayak K, Kundu S (2001) Calculating and describing uncertainty in risk assessment: the Bayesian approach. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 7:307–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ogino S, Wilson RB (2004) Bayesian analysis and risk assessment in genetic counseling and testing. J Mol Diagn 6:1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Patil GP, Rao CR (1978) Weighted distributions and size-biased sampling with applications to wildlife populations and human families. Biometrics 34:179–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Post E, Hoaglin D, Deck L, Larntz K (2001) An empirical Bayes approach to estimating the relation of mortality to exposure to particulate matter. Risk Anal 21:837–842

    Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team (2004) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available from http://www.R-project.org

  • Ricci PF, Rice D, Ziagos J, Cox LA Jr (2003) Precaution, uncertainty and causation in environmental decisions. Environ Int 29:1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sansgiry P, Akman O (2000) Transformations of the lognormal distribution as a selection model. Am Statist 54:307–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shalat SL, Solo-Gabriele HM, Fleming LE et al (2006) A pilot study of children’s exposure to CCA-treated wood from playground equipment. Sci Total Environ 367:80–88

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shibata T, Solo-Gabriele HM, Fleming LE, Shalat SL, Cai Y, Townsend T (2005) Potential arsenic exposure to children associated with in-service and recycled CCA-treated wood in tropical environments. WIT Trans Ecol Envioron 85:349–365

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stein WE, Dattero R (1985) Sampling bias and the inspection paradox. Math Mag 58:96–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • US EPA (US Environmental Protection Agency) (1996) Soil screening guidance: technical background document. EPA/540/R-95/128. US EPA, Washington, DC. Available from http://www.epa.gov/superfund/health/conmedia/soil/toc.htm#p2

  • US EPA (US Environmental Protection Agency) (1997) Exposure factors handbook. Volume I. General factors. EPA/600/P-95/002Fa. US EPA, Washington, DC. Available from http://www.epa.gov/ncea/pdfs/efh/front.pdf

  • US EPA (US Environmental Protection Agency) (2001) Supplemental guidance for developing soil screening levels for superfund sites. OSWER 9355.4–24. US EPA, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • US EPA (US Environmental Protection Agency) (2002) Child-specific exposure factors handbook. EPA-600-P-00–002 B. US EPA, Washington, DC. Available from http://www.cfpub.epa.gov/ncea/cfm/recordisplay.cfm?deid=55145

  • US EPA (US Environmental Protection Agency) (2007) National Center for Environmental Assessment. Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS). Available from http://www.epa.gov/iris

  • US EPA (US Environmental Protection Agency) (2007) Office of Research and Development. Health Effects Assessment Summary Tables (HEAST). EPA-540-R-97-036. US EPA, Washington, DC

  • Valleron AJ (2000) Mise en évidence des faits et recherche des causes en épidémiologie environnementale: enjeux méthodologiques. CR Acad Sci Paris, Sci Vie/Life Sci 323:617–628

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Varis O, Kuikka S (1997) Joint use of multiple environmental assessment models by a Bayesian meta-model: the Baltic salmon case. Ecol Model 102:341–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang TA, Mc Ternan WF (2002) The development and application of a multilevel decision analysis model for the remediation of contaminated groundwater under uncertainty. J Environ Manage 64:221–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

  1. Grupo de Geoquímica Ambiental, E.T.S.I. Minas Madrid, Alenza 4, 28003, Madrid, Spain

    I. Iribarren, E. Chacón & E. De Miguel

Authors
  1. I. Iribarren
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. E. Chacón
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. E. De Miguel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. De Miguel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Iribarren, I., Chacón, E. & De Miguel, E. A Bayesian Approach to Probabilistic Risk Assessment in Municipal Playgrounds. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 56, 165–172 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00244-008-9161-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00244-008-9161-2

Keywords

  • Environmental Protection Agency
  • Prior Distribution
  • Hazard Index
  • Predictive Distribution
  • Hazard Quotient