Skip to main content
Log in

Laboratory Investigation of the Toxicity and Interaction of Pesticide Mixtures in Daphnia magna

  • Published:
Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The probabilistic ecological risk assessment-toxic equivalent (PERA-TE) combination approach is a relatively new risk assessment approach used to assess the toxicity and interaction of chemical mixtures. The validity and effectiveness of the PERA-TE combination approach has been tested previously in field microcosm studies using pesticide mixtures. The related laboratory studies described here, using Daphnia magna, were conducted to verify the conclusions made regarding the toxicity and interaction of the mixtures tested in the microcosms. Two types of pesticide mixture were assessed: the first consisted of pesticides with similar modes of action (chlorpyrifos, diazinon, and azinphos-methyl; OP mixture), and the second consisted of pesticides with different modes of action (chlorpyrifos, endosulfan, and trifluralin; CET mixture). Similar to the field studies, PERA-TE mixtures with a predetermined effect assessment criterion (10th centile of acute toxicity effects distributions) and proportional ratio (89:11 for binary mixture and 80:10:10 for ternary mixtures) were tested. Further assessment of the (PERA-) TE approach was achieved by altering the effect assessment criterion (to EC/LC50 point estimates) and the proportional ratio of the pesticides in the mixture (to 50:25:25). Generally, but with some exceptions, basing mixtures on species-specific effect criteria and/or changing the proportional ratio of pesticides in the mixture redistributed the concentration of pesticides in the mixture to produce an equitoxic response. The ability to produce these equitoxic responses supported the conclusions drawn from the field studies: The pesticide toxicity in the OP and CET PERA-TE mixtures were effectively additive. Furthermore, it is shown that these alternative (PERA-) TE mixtures would be suitable to confirm or reject the interaction of chemicals in a PERA-TE mixture.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AQUIRE Database (1994) US Environmental Protection Agency, Duluth, MN. Aailable from http://www.epa.gov/ecotox

  • Calabrese EJ (1991) Multiple chemical interactions. Lewis, Chelsea, MI

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardwell RD, Parkhurst BR, Warren-Hicks W, Volosin JS (1993) Aquatic ecological risk. Water Environ Technol 5:47–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Compton R, Sigal EA (1999) The use of toxic equivalency factors (TEFs) in ecological risk assessment: strengths and limitations. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 5:33–42

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • El-Masri HA, Reardon KF, Yang RSH (1997) Integrated approaches for the analysis of toxicologic interactions of chemical mixtures. Crit Rev Toxicol 27:175–197

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • George TK, Liber K, Solomon KR, Sibley PK (2003) Assessment of the probabilistic risk assessment–toxic equivalent combination approach for evaluating pesticide mixture toxicity to zooplankton in outdoor microcosms. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 45:453–461

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Giesy JP, Solomon KR, Coats JR, Dixon KR, Giddings JM, Kenaga EE (1999) Chlorpyrifos: ecological risk assessment in North American aquatic environments. Rev Environ Contam Toxicol 160:1–129

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hanson ML, Solomon KR (2004) Haloacetic acids in the aquatic environment. Part II: ecological risk assessment. Environ Pollut 130:385–401

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kenaga EE, Whitney WK, Hardy JL, Doty AE (1965) Laboratory tests with Dursban insecticide. J Econ Entomol 58:1043–1050

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kersting K, van Wijngaarden R (1992) Effects of chlorpyrifos on a microecosystem. Environ Toxicol Chem 11:365–372

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Klaine SJ, Cobb GP, Dickerson RL, et al. (1996) An ecological risk assessment for the use of the biocide, dibromonitrilopropionamide (DBNPA) in industrial cooling systems. Environ Toxicol Chem 15:21–30

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Könemann WH, Pieters MN (1996) Confusion of concepts in mixture toxicology. Food Chem Toxicol 34:1025–1031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macek KJ, Lindberg MA, Sauter S, Buxton KS, Costa PA (1976) Toxicity of four pesticides to water fleas and fathead minnows. Acute and chronic toxicity of Acrolein, Heptachlor, Endosulfan, and Trifluralin to the water flea (Daphnia magna) and the fathead minnow (Pimephales promelas). EPA-600/3-76-099. Environmental Research Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, Duluth, MN

    Google Scholar 

  • Maund SJ, Travis KZ, Hendley P, Giddings JM, Solomon KR (2001) Probabilistic risk assessment of cotton pyrethroids: V. Combining landscape-level exposures and exotoxicological effects data to characterize risks. Environ Toxicol Chem 20:687–692

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Moore MT, Huggett DB, Gillespie WB Jr., Rogers JH Jr., Cooper CM (1998) Comparative toxicity of chlordane, chlorpyrifos, and aldicarb to four aquatic testing organisms. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 34:152–157

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rand GM, Wells PG, McCarty LS. 1995. Introduction to aquatic toxicology. In: Rand GM (ed) Fundamentals of aquatic toxicology: Effects, environmental fate and risk assessment, 2nd ed. Taylor & Francis, Washington, DC, pp 3–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts SM (1999) Practical issues in the use of probabilistic risk assessment. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 5:729–736

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Safe SH (1998) Hazard and risk assessment of chemical mixtures using the toxic equivalency factor approach. Environ Health Perspect 106:1051–1055

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Safe SH (1999) Development and application of TEFs. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 5:9–12

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sánchez M, Ferrando MD, Sancho E, Andreu-Moliner E (1998) Evaluation of a Daphnia magna renewal life-cycle test method with diazinon. J Environ Sci Health B33:785–797

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanders HO (1970) Toxicities of some herbicides to six species of freshwater crustaceans. J Water Pollut Contam Fed 42:1544–1550

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • SigmaStat® Statistical Software Version 2.03. SPSS Inc., Chicago

  • SERAC (Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry) (1994) Aquatic dialogue group: pesticide risk assessment and mitigation. Final report. SETAC Foundation for Environmental Education, Pensacola, FL

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon KR (1996) Overview of recent developments in ecotoxicological risk assessment. Risk Anal 16:627–633

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon KR, Baker DB, Richards RP, et al. (1996) Ecological risk assessment of atrazine in North American surface waters. Environ Toxicol Chem 15:31–76

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon KR, Giesy J, Jones P (2000) Probabilistic risk assessment of agrochemicals in the environment. Crop Prot 19:649–655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon KR, Takacs P (2001) Probabilistic risk assessment using species sensitivity distributions. In: Posthuma L, Traas T, Suter GW (eds) Species sensitivity in risk assessment. Boca Raton, FL, pp 285–313

  • US EPA (US Environmental Protection Agency) (1985) Methods for measuring the acute toxicity of effluents to freshwater and marine organisms. EPA/600/4-85/013. U. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH

  • US EPA (US Environmental Protection Agency) (1994) Trimmed Spearman–Karber (TSK) Program, Version 1.5. Ecological Monitoring Research Division, Environmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory, US Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OH

    Google Scholar 

  • van Wijngaarden R, Leeuwangh P, Lucassen WGH, et al. (1993) Acute toxicity of chlorpyrifos to fish, a newt, and aquatic invertebrates. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 51:716–723

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

We thank John Struger and Scott Painter (Environment Canada, Ecosystem Health Division, Burlington, ON, Canada) for the use of their pesticide exposure data.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karsten Liber.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

George, T.K., Liber, K. Laboratory Investigation of the Toxicity and Interaction of Pesticide Mixtures in Daphnia magna . Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 52, 64–72 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00244-005-0271-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00244-005-0271-9

Keywords

Navigation