Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Land Use Influences and Ecotoxicological Ratings for Upper Clinch River Tributaries in Virginia

  • Published:
Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Clinch River system of southwestern Virginia and northeastern Tennessee is among the most biodiverse aquatic ecosystems of the United States, but its fauna are in decline. Unionidae (freshwater mussel) species are a major component of the Clinch’s aquatic community, and their decline is well documented. Point-source discharges within the Clinch drainage are few, and primary stressors on the biota are believed to originate from non–point sources that are transported into the mainstem by tributaries. Currently, the relative influences of tributaries as stressors on aquatic biota are unclear. We studied 19 major tributaries of the free-flowing Upper Clinch River, developed an Ecotoxicological Rating (ETR) utilizing eight parameters, and assessed stream quality among land use categories using the ETR rating system. Biological, toxicological, habitat, and chemical variables were measured in each tributary, near its confluence with the Clinch. Geographic Information System software was used to quantify land use within each tributary watershed; all tributary watersheds are predominately forested, but agricultural, mining, and developed land uses (urban, transportation) are also present. ETRs indicated that the tributaries draining mining-influenced watersheds had greater potential impact on the mainstem than those draining agricultural or forested watersheds, because of poor benthic macroinvertebrate scores. ETRs ranged from 44 to 63, on a 100-point scale, for mining-influenced tributaries compared to agricultural (57–86) and forested tributaries (64–91). Mean ETRs for the mining-influenced tributaries (51) were significantly different than ETRs from agricultural and forested streams (75 and 80, respectively), and the presence of developed land uses had no significant relationship with ETRs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahlstedt SA (1984) Twentieth century changes in the freshwater mussel fauna of the Clinch River (Tennessee and Virginia). MS thesis, Department of Zoology, University of Tennessee

  • American Public Health Association (APHA), American Water Works Association, Water Environment Federation (1995) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 19th ed. American Public Health Association, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) (1995) Standard methods for measuring the toxicity of sediment contaminants with freshwater invertebrates (ASTM E 1706-95b). Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

  • Barbour MT, Gerritsen J, Snyder BD, Stribling JB (1999) Rapid bioassessment protocols for use in streams and wadeable rivers: periphyton, benthic macroinvertebrates and fish, second edition. EPA 841-B-99-002. US EPA, Office of Water, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Belanger SE, Farris JL, Cherry DS, Cairns J Jr (1986) Growth of Asiatic clams (Corbicula sp.) during and after long-term zinc exposure in field-located and laboratory artificial streams. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 15:427–434

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chaplin S, Gerrard R, Watson H, Master L, Flack S (2000) The geography of imperilment: targeting conservation toward critical biodiversity areas. In: Stein B, Kutner L, Adams J, (eds) Precious heritage: the status of biodiversity in the United States. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 159–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Cherry DS, Currie RJ, Soucek DJ, Latimer HA, Trent GC (2001) An integrative assessment of a watershed impacted by abandoned mined land discharges. Environ Pollut 111:377–388

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Clements WH (1994) Benthic community responses to heavy metals in the upper Arkansas River Basin, Colorado. J N Am Benthol Soc 13:30–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clements WH (2000) Integrating effects of contaminants across levels of biological organization: an overview. J Aquat Ecosyst Stress Recov 7:113–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dennis SD (1987) An unexpected decline in populations of the freshwater mussel, Dysnomia (=Epioblasma) capsaeformis, in the Clinch River of Virginia and Tennessee. Va J Sci 38:281–288

    Google Scholar 

  • Diamond JM, Bressler DW, Serveiss VB (2002) Assessing relationships between human land uses and the decline of native mussels, fish, and macroinvertebrates in the Clinch and Powell River Watershed, USA. Environ Sci Technol 21:1147–1155

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dobbs WK, Welch EB (2000) Establishing nutrient criteria in streams. J N Am Benthol Soc 19:186–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doherty FG, Cherry DS (1988) Tolerance of the Asiatic clam Corbicula spp. to lethal levels of toxic stressors—a review. Environ Pollut 51:269–313

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goodfellow WL, Ausley LL, Burton DT, Denton DL, Dorn PB, Grothe DR, Heber MA, Norbery-King TJ, Rodgers JH Jr (2000) Major ion toxicity in effluents: a review with permitting recommendations. Environ Toxicol Chem 19:175–182

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Goudreau SE, Neves RJ, Sheehan RJ (1993) Effects of wastewater treatment plant effluents on freshwater mollusks in the upper Clinch River, Virginia, USA. Hydrobiologia 252:211–230

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huynh H, Feldt LS (1970) Conditions under which mean square ratios in repeated measures designs have exact F-distributions. J Am Statist Assoc 65:1582–1549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson JM, Beckmann JP, Oring LW (2003) Diurnal and nocturnal behavior of American avocets. Wilson Bull 115:176–185

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson RA, Wichern DW (1988) Applied multivariate statistical analysis. Prentice Hall, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones JW, Neves RJ, Patterson MA, Good CR, DiVittorio A (2001) A status survey of freshwater mussel populations in the upper Clinch River, Tazewell County, Virginia. Banisteria 17:20–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy AJ, Cherry DS, Currie RJ (2003) Field and laboratory assessment of a coal processing effluent in the Leading Creek Watershed, Meigs Co., Ohio. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 44:324–331

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Merritt RW, Cummins KW (1996) An introduction to the aquatic insects of North America. 3rd ed. Kendall/Hunt, Dubuque, Iowa

    Google Scholar 

  • Milan CD, Farris JL (1997) Risk identification associated with iron-dominated mine discharges and their effect upon freshwater bivalves. Environ Toxicol Chem 17:1611–1619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nebeker AV, Cairns MA, Gakstatter JH, Malueg KW, Schuytema GS, Krawczyk DF (1984) Biological methods for determining toxicity of contaminated freshwater sediments to invertebrates. Environ Toxicol Chem 3:617–630

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Neves RJ (1991) Mollusks. In: Virginia’s endangered species, proceedings of a symposium. Karen Terwilliger coordinator, Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries, pp 251–263

  • Ng HYF, Mayer T, Marsalek J (1993) Phosphorus transpost in runoff from a small agricultural watershed. Water Sci Technol 28:451–460

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ortmann AE (1918) The nayades (freshwater mussels) of the upper Tennessee Drainage, with notes on synonymy and distribution. Proc Am Philos Soc 57:521–626

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg DM, Resh VH (1993) Introduction to freshwater biomonitoring and benthic macroinvertebrates. In: Rosenberg DM, Resh VH (eds) Biomonitoring and benthic macroinvertebrates. Chapman and Hall, New York, pp 1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Sall J, Lehman A, Creighton L (2001) JMP start statistics. 2nd ed. SAS Institute. Duxbury Press, Belmont, California

    Google Scholar 

  • Salomons W, de Rooij NM, Kerdijk H, Bril J (1987) Sediments as a source for contaminants? Hydrobiologia 149:13–30

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt TS, Soucek DJ, Cherry DS (2002) Modification of an ecotoxicological rating to bioassess small acid mine drainage-impacted watersheds exclusive of benthic macroinvertebrate analysis. Environ Toxicol Chem 21:1091–1097

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Seber GAF (1984) Multivariate observations. John Wiley and Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Smart MM, Barney TW, Jones JR (1981) Watershed impact on stream quality: a technique for regional assessment. J Soil Water Conserv 36:297–300

    Google Scholar 

  • Soucek DJ, Cherry DS, Currie RJ, Latimer HA, Trent GC (2000) Laboratory to field validation in an integrative assessment of an acid mine drainage-impacted watershed. Environ Toxicol Chem 19:1036–1043

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Soucek DJ, Cherry DS, Trent GC (2000) Relative acute toxicity of acid mine drainage water column and sediments to Daphnia magna in the Puckett’s Creek Watershed, Virginia, USA. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 38:305–310

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Soucek DJ, Schmidt TS, Cherry DS (2001) In situ studies with Asian clams (Corbicula fluminea) detect acid mine drainage and nutrient inputs in low order streams. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 58:602–608

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stansbery DH (1973) A preliminary report on the naiad fauna of the Clinch River in the Southern Appalachian Mountains of Virginia and Tennessee (Mollusca: Bivalvia: Unionoida). Bull Am Malacol Un 1972:20–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Swansburg EO, Fairchild WL, Fryer BJ, Ciborowski JJH (2002) Mouthpart deformities and community composition of Chironomidae (Diptera) larvae downstream of metal mines in New Brunswick, Canada. Environ Toxicol Chem 21:2675–2684

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Swift MC (1982) Effects of coal pile runoff on stream quality and macro-invertebrate communities. University of Maryland, College Park, MD, Water Resources Research Center NA-062-MD Tech Rep 68

  • US EPA (2000) A stream condition index for West Virginia wadeable streams, Region 3 Environmental Services Division. Prepared by Tetra Tech, Inc. July 21, 2000

  • US EPA (2001) Mid-Atlantic highlands stream assessment. EPA/903/R-00/015

  • US EPA (2002) Ambient water quality criteria recommendations. Rivers and streams in nutrient ecoregion XI. EPA 822-B-00-020 http://www.epa.gov/waterscience/criteria/nutrient/ecoregions/rivers/rivers_11.pdf

  • US EPA (2003) Protecting water quality from agricultural runoff. EPA 841-F- 03-004. Nonpoint Source Control Branch, Washington, DC

  • US EPA (2003) Total maximum daily loads. National section 303(d) list fact sheet. http://www.oaspub.epa.gov/waters/national_rept.control>Accessed26November2003

  • US Fish and Wildlife Service (2002) Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants: box score. Endangered Species Bull 19: 32

    Google Scholar 

  • van der Schalie H (1938) Contributing factors in the depletion of naiades in Eastern United States. Basteria 3:51–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogelmann J, Howard S, Yang L, Larson C, Wylie B, Van Driel N (2001) Completion of the 1990s National Land Cover Data Set for the conterminous United States from Landsat Thematic Mapper Data and ancillary data sources. Photogramm Eng Remote Sensing 67:650–662

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoder CO, Rankin ET (1996) Assessing the condition and status of aquatic life designated uses in urban and suburban watersheds. In: Roesner LA (ed) Effects of watershed development and management on aquatic ecosystems. American Society of Civil Engineers, New York, New York, pp 210–227

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman LL (2003) Propagation of juvenile freshwater mussels (Bivalvia: Unionidae) and assessment of habitat suitability for restoration of mussels in the Clinch River, Virginia. Unpublished MS thesis, Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the Virginia Nature Conservancy, Clinch Valley Program, Abingdon, VA, for their funding support. The authors also thank Chris Burcher and Jeff Galang for GIS assistance, Matthew Johnson for statistical assistance, and Jack Brookshire for his suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biology, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 2119 Derring Hall, Blacksburg, Virginia, 24061, USA

    B. A. Locke & D. S. Cherry

  2. Department of Crop and Soil Environmental Science, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 363 Smyth Hall, Blacksburg, Virginia, 24061, USA

    C. E. Zipper

  3. Department of Biology, Roanoke College, Life Science Building, Salem, Virginia, 24153, USA

    R. J. Currie

  4. Olver Incorporated, Applied Science and Technology Division, 1116 South Main Street, Blacksburg, Virginia, 24060, USA

    B. A. Locke

Authors
  1. B. A. Locke
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. D. S. Cherry
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. C. E. Zipper
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. R. J. Currie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. A. Locke.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Locke, B.A., Cherry, D.S., Zipper, C.E. et al. Land Use Influences and Ecotoxicological Ratings for Upper Clinch River Tributaries in Virginia. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 51, 197–205 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00244-005-0027-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00244-005-0027-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation