Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Toxicity Assessment of Two Soils from Jales Mine (Portugal) Using Plants: Growth and Biochemical Parameters

  • Published:
Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Contaminants in soils can enter food chains through primary producers. Bioavailable contaminants can induce growth, and reproductive or biochemical changes in plants. To evaluate the bioavailability of heavy metals in two soils from Jales mine surroundings, bioassays with the plants Brassica rapa (RCBr) and Avena sativa were performed. Biochemical parameters (protein and malondialdehyde [MDA] content, and catalase and peroxidase activities) were also measured. The soils had different heavy metal contents: JNC soil contained low heavy metal concentrations, whereas JC soil had high heavy metal contents. Results stressed the difference between species sensitivity, with A. sativa showing no toxicity effects when exposed to both soils. On the other hand, B. rapa presented a decrease in growth parameters when exposed to JNC soil and no changes when exposed to JC soil. A Life Cycle Bioassay confirmed this trend for B. rapa exposed to JNC soil, but also evidenced that JC soil was affecting B. rapa in terms of flower and seed pod production. Biochemical assays showed that plants affected by heavy metals also displayed oxidative stress, with an increase in MDA production, reduction of protein content, and reduction of catalase and peroxidase activities. All bioassays revealed that JNC soil, although with a lower heavy metal content, had a higher bioavailable fraction when compared to JC soil, which consequently increased its toxicity to plants.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+
from $39.99 /Month
  • Starting from 10 chapters or articles per month
  • Access and download chapters and articles from more than 300k books and 2,500 journals
  • Cancel anytime
View plans

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aebi H (1974) Catalase. Methods of enzymatic analysis. Bergmeyer, Verlag Chemie–Academic Press, New York, pp 673–684

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahlers J, Martin S (2003) Risk assessment of chemicals in soil: Recent developments in the EU. J Soils Sediments 3:240–241

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Allen HE (2002) Bioavailability of metals in terrestrial ecosystems: Importance of partitioning for bioavailability to invertebrates, microbes, and plants. SETAC, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • An YJ (2004) Soil toxicity assessment using cadmium sensitive plants. Environ Pollut 127:21–26

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Aydin N, Kadioglu A (2001) Changes in the chemical composition, polyphenol oxidase and peroxidase activities during development and ripening of medlar fruits (Mespilus germanica L.). Bulg J Plant Physiol 27:85–92

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bradford MM (1976) A rapid and sensitive method for the quantification of microgram quantities of protein utilising the principle of protein binding. Anal Biochem 72:248–254

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carter JA, Mroz RE, Tay KL, Doe KG (1998) An evaluation of the use of soil and sediment bioassays in the assessment of three contaminated sites in atlantic Canada. Water Qual Res J Canada 33:295–317

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen J, Song L, Dai J, Gan N, Liu Z (2004) Effects of microsystins on the growth and the activity of superoxide dismutase and peroxidase of rape (Brassica napus L.) and rice (Oryza sativa L.). Toxicon 43:393–400

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • CSTEE (2000) The available scientific approaches to assess the potential effects and risk of chemicals on terrestrial ecosystems. European Commission. Brussels, C2/JCD/csteeop/Ter91100/D(0): 178

    Google Scholar 

  • Debus R, Hund K (1997) Development of analytical methods for the assessment of ecotoxicological relevant soil contamination. Part B—Ecotoxicological analysis in soil and soil extracts. Chemosphere 35:239–261

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • DECHEMA (1995) Bioassays for soils. DECHEMA, Deutsche Gesellschaft für Chemisches Apparatewesen, Chemische Technik und Biotechnologie e. V. Frankfurt am Main: 45

    Google Scholar 

  • Desimone M, Henke A, Wagner E (1996) Oxidative stress induces partia1 degradation of the large subunit of ribulose-l,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase in isolated chloroplasts of barley. Plant Physiol 111:789–796

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dick RP, Breakwell DP, Turco RF (1996) Soil enzymes activity and biodiversity measurements as integrative microbiological indicators. In: Doran JW, Jones AJ (eds) Methods for assessing soil quality. Soil Science Society of America, Inc., Madison, Wisconsin, pp 247–272

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairbrother A, Glazebrook PW, Van Straalen N, Tarazona JV (1999) Test methods for hazard determination of metals and sparingly soluble metal compounds in soils: Summary of a SETAC Pellston workshop. SETAC. San Lourenzo de El Escorial, Spain, Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry (SETAC)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fekete S, Mándy A, Stefanovits-Bányai E (2002) Change of peroxidase enzyme activities in annual cuttings during rooting. Acta Biol Szegediensis 46:29–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Fjälloborg B, Dave G (2004) Toxicity of Sb and Cu in sewage sludge to terrestrial plants (lettuce, oat, radish), and of sludge elutriate to aquatic organisms (Daphnia and Lemna) and its interaction. Water Air Soil Pollution 155:3–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Gong P, Wilke B-M, Fleischmann S (1999) Soil-based phytotoxicity of 2,4,6- trinitrotoluene (TNT) to terrestrial higher plants. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 36:152–157

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gong P, Wilke B-M, Strozzi E, Fleischmann S (2001) Evaluation and refinement of a continuous seed germination and early seedling growth test for the use in the ecotoxicological assessment of soils. Chemosphere 44:491–500

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann WA, Poorter H (2002) Avoiding bias in calculations of relative growth rate. Annals Botany 80:37–42

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO (1993) Soil quality—Sampling—Part 6: Guidance on the collection, handling and storage of soil for the assessment of aerobic microbial processes in the laboratory. ISO—The International Organization for Standardization, Genève, ISO 10381-6: 4

  • ISO (1995) Soil quality—Determination of the effects of pollutants on soil flora—Part 2: Effects of chemicals on the emergence of higher plants. ISO—The International Organization for Standardization. Genève, ISO 11269-2: p 7

  • ISO (2003) Soil quality—Guidance on the ecotoxicological characterization of soils and soil material. ISO—The International Organization for Standardization. Genève, ISO 15799: 33

  • ISO (2005) Soil quality- Biological methods- Chronic toxicity in higher plants. ISO—The International Organization for Standardization. Genève, ISO 22030: p 18

  • Király I, Czovek P (2002) Changes of MDA level and O2 scavenging enzyme activities in wheat varieties as a result of PEG treatment. Proceedings of the 7th Hungarian Congress on Plant Physiology. Acta Biologica Szegediensis, Hungary, 46:105–106

  • Kördel W, Römbke J (2001) Requirements on physical, chemical and biological testing for estimating the quality of soils and soils substrates. J Soils Sediments 1:98–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Krishna MNS, van Iersel MW (2003) Light effects on wax begonia: Photosynthesis, growth respiration, and maintenance respiration. Acta Horticulturae 624:541–547

    Google Scholar 

  • Loureiro S, Ferreira ALG, Soares AMVM, Nogueira AJA (2005) Evaluation of the toxicity of two soils from Jales mine (Portugal) using aquatic bioassays. Chemosphere 61:168–177

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Maxam G, Rila J-P, Dott W, Eisentraeger A (2000) Use of bioassays for assessment of water-extractable ecotoxic potential of soils. Ecotoxicol Environ Safety 45:240–246

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2003 (draft version)) Terrestrial plant test: Seedling emergence and seedling growth test. OECD—Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, Paris, 208: 6

  • Ohlinger R (1996) Soil sampling and sample preparation. In: Schinner F, Ohlinger R, Kandeler E, Margesin R (eds) Methods in soil biology. Springer-verlag, Berlin, pp 7–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Prasad KVSK, Pardha Saradhi P, Sharmila P (1999) Concerted action of antioxidant enzymes and curtailed growth under zinc toxicity in Brassica juncea. Environ Exp Botany 42:1–10

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Radford PJ (1967) Growth analysis formulae- their use and abuse. Crop Science 7:171–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sakihama Y, Cohen MF, Grace SC, Yamasaki H (2002) Plant phenolic antioxidant and prooxidant activities: Phenolics-induced oxidative damage mediated by metals in plants. Toxicology 177:67–80

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sheppard SC, Evenden WG, Abboud SA, Stephenson M (1993) A plant life-cycle bioassay for contaminated soil, with comparison to other bioassays: mercury and zinc. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 25:27–35

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • SPSS (1995) SigmaStat for Windows (version 2.03). Science, Illinois

  • SPSS (2002) SigmaPlot for Windows (version 8.02). Science, California, USA

  • Stoeva N, Bineva T (2003) Oxidative changes and photosynthesis in oat plants grown in As-contaminated soil. Bulg J Plant Physiol 29:87–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Storer DA (1984) A simple high sample volume ashing procedure for determination of soil organic matter. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 15:759–772

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Takahama U, Egashira T (1991) Peroxidases in vacuoles of Vicia faba leaves. Phytochemistry 30:73–77

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tarazona JV, Hund K, Jager T, Salonen MS, Soares AMVM, Skaare JU, Vighi M (2002) Standardizing chemical risk assessment, at last. Nature 415:14

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vieira Santos CL, Campos A, Azevedo H, Caldeira G (2001) In situ and in vitro senescence induced by KCl stress: nutritional imbalance, lipid peroxidation and antioxidant metabolism. J Exp Botany 52:351–360

    Google Scholar 

  • Vitória AP, Lea PJ, Azevedo RA (2001) Antioxidant enzyme responses to cadmium in radish tissues. Phytochemistry 57:701–710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilke B-M, Winkel B, Fleischmann S, Gong P (1998) Higher plant growth and microbial toxicity tests for the evaluation of ecotoxic potential of soils. In: Telford T (ed) Contaminated soils ‘98 London, pp 345–354

  • Willekens H, Chamnongpol S, Davey M, Schraudner M, Langebartelse C, Van Montagu M, Inzé D, Van Camp W (1997) Catalase is a sink for H2O2 and is indispensable for stress defence in C3 plants. EMBO J 16:4806–4816

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zar JH (1996) Biostatistical analysis. Prentice-Hall International, Inc., New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia, for providing PhD grants to Susana Loureiro, Marta Monteiro, and Glória Pinto, and through the Research Grant Project ERAS (REF. POTI-MGS-34782-2000).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Susana Loureiro.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Loureiro, S., Santos, C., Pinto, G. et al. Toxicity Assessment of Two Soils from Jales Mine (Portugal) Using Plants: Growth and Biochemical Parameters. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 50, 182–190 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00244-004-0261-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00244-004-0261-3

Keywords