Survival of Lost River Suckers (Deltistes luxatus) Challenged with Flavobacterium columnare During Exposure to Sublethal Ammonia Concentrations at pH 9.5

  • Jeffrey M. Morris
  • Elaine Snyder-Conn
  • J. Scott Foott
  • Richard A. Holt
  • Michael J. Suedkamp
  • Hilary M. Lease
  • Susan J. Clearwater
  • Joseph S. Meyer


The Lost River sucker (Deltistes luxatus) is a federally listed, endangered species inhabiting the hypereutrophic waters of Upper Klamath Lake in southern Oregon, USA. High pH (≥10) and elevated ammonia concentrations (≥1 mg NH3-N/L) often occur during blooms of cyanobacteria (Aphanizomenon flos-aquae) in the lake, with major fish kills sometimes following a mid- or late-summer “crash” of the cyanobacterial population. Previous histopathology analyses and bacterial sampling indicated that infections of the pathogenic bacterium Flavobacterium columnare might contribute to the fish kills. We hypothesized that prior exposure to adverse water quality conditions increases the susceptibility of Lost River suckers to F. columnare infections. To test this, we exposed juvenile Lost River suckers to four sublethal ammonia concentrations at pH 9.4 for 62 d. On day 31, fish in half of the aquaria were exposed to F. columnare. As expected, survival of the Lost River suckers decreased in aquaria inoculated with F. columnare. Ninety-four percent of the fish that died were infected by F. columnare in the gills, kidney, or skin, whereas none of the survivors or unexposed control fish was infected. However, contrary to our hypothesis, survival of the fish exposed to F. columnare increased significantly (p < 0.05) as unionized ammonia concentrations increased. Our results suggest that complex interactions can complicate prediction of the responses of fish to concurrent chemical stressors and bacterial pathogens.


  1. Anacker RL, Ordal EJ (1959) Studies on the myxobacterium Chondrococcus columnaris. I. Serological typing. J Bacteriol 78:25–32Google Scholar
  2. APHA (American Public Health Association), AWWA (American Water Works Association), WEF (Water Environment Federation) (1995) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 19th edition. American Public Health Association, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  3. Bertolini JM, Rohovec JS (1992) Electrophoretic detection of proteases from different Flexibacter columnaris strains and assessment of their variability. Dis Aquat Org 12:121–128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brockway DR (1950) Metabolic products and their effects. Progr Fish-Cultur 12:127–129Google Scholar
  5. Coots M (1965) Occurrences of Lost River sucker, Deltistes luxatus (Cope), and shortnose sucker, Chasmistes brevirostris (Cope), in northern California. Calif Fish Game 51:68–73Google Scholar
  6. Decostere A, Haesebrouck F, Turnbull JF, Charlier G (1999a) Influence of water quality and temperature on adhesion of high and low virulence Flavobacterium columnare strains to isolated gill arches. J Fish Dis 22:1–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Decostere A, Ducatelle R, Haesebrouck F, Van Driessche E, Charlier G (1999b) Characterization of the adhesion of Flavobacterium columnare (Flexibacter columnaris) to gill tissue. J Fish Dis 22:465–474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Emerson K, Russo RC, Lund RE, Thurston RV (1975) Aqueous ammonia equilibrium calculations: effect of pH and temperature. J Fish Res Board Can 32:2379–2383Google Scholar
  9. Ferguson HW (1989) Systemic pathology of fish: a text and atlas of comparative tissue responses in diseases of teleosts. Iowa State University Press, Ames, IAGoogle Scholar
  10. Gerhardt P (ed) (1981) Manual of methods for general bacteriology. American Society for Microbiology, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  11. Gona O (1979) Mucous glycoproteins of teleostean fish: a comparative histochemical study. Histochemistry 11:709–718Google Scholar
  12. Griffin BR (1991) Characteristics of a chondroitin AC lyase produced by Cytophaga columnaris. Trans Am Fish Soc 120:391–395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Griffin BR (1992) A simple procedure for identification of Cytophaga columnaris. J Aquat Anim Health 4:63–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hawke JP, Thune RL (1992) Systemic isolation and antimicrobial susceptibility of Cytophaga columnaris from commercially reared channel catfish. J Aquat Anim Health 4:109–113Google Scholar
  15. Hibiya T (1982) An atlas of fish histology. Gustav Fischer Verlag, New York, NYGoogle Scholar
  16. Holt RA, Amandi A, Rohovec JS, Fryer JL (1989) Relation of water temperature to bacterial cold-water disease in coho salmon, Chinook salmon, and rainbow trout. J Aquat Anim Health 1:94–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Holt RA (2001) Laboratory challenges with the bacterial pathogen, Flavobacterium columnare and infection of juvenile Lost River suckers (Deltistes luxatus) during their exposure to sublethal ammonia concentrations at pH 9.5. Report submitted to the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Klamath Falls, ORGoogle Scholar
  18. Humason GL (1979) Animal Tissue Techniques. Fourth Edition. W.H. Freeman and Company, San Francisco, CAGoogle Scholar
  19. Kann J (1998) Ecology and water quality dynamics of a shallow hypereutrophic lake dominated by cyanobacteria (Aphanizomenon flos-aquae). Ph.D. Dissertation, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NCGoogle Scholar
  20. Lease HM, Hansen JA, Bergman HL, Meyer JS (2003) Structural changes in gills of Lost River suckers exposed to elevated pH and ammonia concentrations. Comp Biochem Physiol Part C 134:491–500Google Scholar
  21. Lewis PA, Klemm DJ, Lazorchak JM, Norberg-King TJ, Peltier WH, Heber MA (eds) (1994) Short-term methods for estimating the chronic toxicity of effluents and receiving waters to freshwater organisms, 3rd ed. EPA-600-4-91-002, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory, Cincinnati, OHGoogle Scholar
  22. Meyer JS, Hansen JA (2002) Subchronic toxicity of low dissolved oxygen concentrations, elevated pH, and elevated ammonia concentrations to Lost River suckers. Trans Am Fish Soc 131:656–666CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Modra H, Svobodova Z, Kolarova J (1998) Comparison of differential leukocyte counts in fish of economic and indicator importance. Acta Vet Brno 67:215–226Google Scholar
  24. Moritomo T, Suerhiro M, Kodama H, Amenori T, Ohba S, Nemoto H, Hasegawa A, Yoshida H (1999) A new method for the identification and enumeration of carp granulocytes. Fish Pathol 34(2):85–86Google Scholar
  25. Pacha RE, Ordal EJ (1970) Myxobacterial diseases of salmonids. In: S.F. Snieszko (ed) A symposium on diseases of fishes and shellfishes. Special Publication No. 5, American Fisheries Society, Washington, DC, pp. 243–257Google Scholar
  26. Perkins D, Scoppettone GG, Buettner M (2000a) Reproductive biology and demographics of endangered Lost River and shortnose suckers in Upper Klamath Lake, Oregon. Project Report, U.S. Geological Survey, Western Fisheries Science Center, Reno, NVGoogle Scholar
  27. Perkins DL, Kann J, Scoppettone GG (2000b) The role of poor water quality and fish kills in the decline of endangered Lost River and shortnose suckers in Upper Klamath Lake. U.S. Geological Survey, Biological Resources Division Report to U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, Klamath Falls, ORGoogle Scholar
  28. Rombough PJ (1999) The gill of fish larvae. Is it primarily a respiratory or an ionoregulatory structure? J Fish Biol 55:186–204Google Scholar
  29. Smart G (1976) The effect of ammonia exposure on gill structure of the rainbow trout (Salmo gairdneri). J Fish Biol 8:471–475Google Scholar
  30. Snyder DT, Morace JL (1997) Nitrogen and phosphorus loading from drained wetlands adjacent to Upper Klamath and Agency Lakes, Oregon. U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 97-4059, Portland, ORGoogle Scholar
  31. USFWS (U.S. Fish, Wildlife Service) (1988) Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants: shortnose and Lost River suckers, Houghton’s goldenrod and Pitcher’s thistle: final rules. Federal Register 53:27130–27134Google Scholar
  32. USFWS (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service) (1993) Recovery plan: Lost River sucker (Deltistes luxatus) and shortnose sucker (Chasmistes brevirostris). U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Portland, ORGoogle Scholar
  33. USFWS (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service) (2002) Biological/conference opinion regarding the effects of operation of the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation’s proposed 10-year operation plan for the Klamath Project and its effect on the endangered Lost River sucker (Deltistes luxatus), endangered shortnose sucker (Chasmistes brevirostris), threatened bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) and proposed critical habitat for the Lost River and shortnose suckers. Prepared by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Klamath Falls Fish and Wildlife Office, Klamath Falls, ORGoogle Scholar
  34. Verdouw H, van Echteld CJA, Dekkers EMJ (1978) Ammonia determination based on indophenol formation with sodium salycilate. Water Res 12:399–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Walters GR, Plumb JA (1980) Environmental stress and bacterial infection in channel catfish, Ictalurus punctatus. J Fish Biol 17:177–185Google Scholar
  36. Weber CI (ed) (1993) Methods for measuring the acute toxicity of effluents and receiving waters to freshwater and marine organisms. Fourth Edition. EPA/600/4-90/027F, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Cincinnati, OHGoogle Scholar
  37. WEST (Western EcoSystems Technology, Inc.), Gulley DD (1994) TOXSTAT® 3.4. Western EcoSystems Technology, Inc., Cheyenne, WYGoogle Scholar
  38. Written PE, Vilwock W, Renwrantz L (1998) Haematogram of the tilapia Oreochromis niloticus (Cichlidae, Teleostei) and application of a putative phenoloxidase for differentiating between neutrophilic granulocytes and monocytes. Can J Zool 76:310–319Google Scholar
  39. Yasutake WT, Wales JH (1983) Microscopic anatomy of Salmonids: an atlas. Research Publication No. 150, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  40. Zar JH (1984) Biostatistical analysis. 2nd Edition. Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, NJGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jeffrey M. Morris
    • 1
  • Elaine Snyder-Conn
    • 2
  • J. Scott Foott
    • 3
  • Richard A. Holt
    • 4
  • Michael J. Suedkamp
    • 1
  • Hilary M. Lease
    • 1
  • Susan J. Clearwater
    • 1
  • Joseph S. Meyer
    • 1
  1. 1. Department of Zoology and PhysiologyUniversity of WyomingLaramieUSA
  2. 2. Daphne Field OfficeU.S. Fish and Wildlife ServiceDaphneUSA
  3. 3. California-Nevada Fish Health Center U.S. Fish and Wildlife ServiceAndersonUSA
  4. 4. Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, and Department of MicrobiologyOregon State UniversityCorvallisUSA

Personalised recommendations