Humic Acid Toxicity in Biologically Treated Soil Contaminated with Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons and Pentachlorophenol

  • J. K. C. Nieman
  • R. C. Sims
  • D. L. Sorensen
  • J. E. McLean
Article

Abstract

Contaminated soil from a land treatment unit at the Libby Groundwater Superfund Site in Libby, MT, was amended with 14C pyrene and incubated for 396 days to promote biodegradation and the formation of soil-associated bound residues. Humic and fulvic acids were extracted from the treated soil microcosms and analyzed for the presence of pyrene residues. Biologic activity promoted 14C association with the fulvic acid fraction, but humic acid–associated 14C did not increase with biologic activity. The Aboatox flash toxicity assay was used to assess the toxicity of humic and fulvic acid fractions. The fulvic acid gave no toxic response, but the humic acid showed significant toxicity. The observed toxicity was likely associated with pentachlorophenol, a known contaminant of the soil that was removed by solvent extraction of the humic acid and that correlated well with toxicity reduction.

References

  1. Alexander, M 1995How toxic are chemicals in soil?Environ Sci Technol2927132717CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berry, DF, Boyd, SA 1985Decontamination of soil through enhanced formation of bound residuesEnviron Sci Technol1911321133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bhandari, A, Novak, JT, Berry, DF 1996Binding of 4-monochlorophenol to soilEnviron Sci Technol3023052311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bhandari, A, Novak, JT, Burgos, WD, Berry, DF 1997Irreversible binding of chlorophenols to soil and its impact on bioavailabilityJ Environ Sci Health Part A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng123506513Google Scholar
  5. Bierkens, J, Klein, G, Corbisier, P, Heuvel, R, Verschaeve, L, Weltens, R,  et al. 1998Comparative sensitivity of 20 bioassays for soil qualityChemosphere3729352947CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bollag, J-M 1992Decontaminating soil with enzymesEnviron Sci Technol618761881CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chen, Y-C, Banks, MK, Schwab, AP 2003Pyrene degradation in the rhizosphere of tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea) and switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L)Environ Sci Technol3757785782CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Chung, N, Alexander, M 1998Difference in sequestration and bioavailability of organic compounds aged in dissimilar soilEnviron Sci Technol32855860CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dyreborg, S, Arvin, E 1995Inhibition of nitrification by creosote-contaminated waterWater Res2916031606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Eschenbach, A, Weinberg, R, Mahro, B 1998Fate and stability of nonextractable residues of [14C] PAH in contaminated soils under environmental stress conditionsEnviron Sci Technol3225852590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Eschenbach, A, Mesher, H, Weinberg, R, Mahro, B 2001

    Humification of PAH and TNT during bioremediation-evaluation of long term risk and sustainability

    Stegmann, R eds. Treatment of contaminated soil; Fundamentals, analysis, applicationsSpringerBerlin, Germany271291
    Google Scholar
  12. Gentry, TJ, Wolf, DC, Reynolds, MC, Fuhrmann, JJ 2003Pyrene and phenanthrene influence on soil microbial populationsBiochemJ75368Google Scholar
  13. Ghoshal, S, Weber, WJ,Jr, Rummel, AM, Trosko, JE, Upham, BL 1999Epigenetic toxicity of a mixture of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons on gap junctional intercellular communication before and after biodegradationEnviron Sci Technol3310441050CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Guthrie, EA, Pfaender, FK 1998Reduced pyrene bioavailability in microbially active soilsEnviron Sci Technol32501508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hartenstein, R 1982Effect of aromatic compounds, humic acids, and lignins, on growth of the earthworm Eisenia foetidaSoil Biol Biochem14595599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Huling SG, Pope DF, Mathews JE, Sims JL, Sims RC, Sorensen DL (1995) Land treatment and the toxicity response of soil contaminated with wood preserving waste. Remediation Spring 41–55Google Scholar
  17. Hurst, CJ, Sims, RC, Sims, JL, Sorensen, DL, McLean, JL, Huling, S 1996Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon biodegradation as a function of oxygen tension in contaminated SoilJ Hazard Mater51193208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jarvis, SA, Honeycutt, ME, McFarland, VA, Bulich, AA, Bound, HC 1996A comparison of the Ames assay and Mutatox in assessing the mutagenic potential of contaminated dredged sedimentsEcotoxicol Environ Saf33193200CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Juhasz, AL, Stanley, GA, Britz, ML 2000Degradation of high molecular weight PAHs in contaminated soil by a bacterial consortium: Effects on microtox and mutagenicity bioassaysBiochem J4271283Google Scholar
  20. Lambert, M, Kremer, S, Anke, H 1995Antimicrobial, phytotoxic, nematicidal, cytotoxic, and mutagenic activities of 1-hydroxypyrene, the initial metabolite in pyrene metabolism by the basidiomycete Crinipellis stipitariaBull Environ Contam Toxicol55251257CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Lappalainen, J, Juvonen, R, Vaajasaari, K, Karp, M 1999A new flash method for measuring the toxicity of solid and colored samplesChemosphere3810691083CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lee, J-H, Landrum, PF, Koh, C-H 2002Toxicokinetics and time-dependent PAH toxicity in the amphipod Hyalella aztecaEnviron Sci Technol3631243130CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Loehr, RC, Webster, MT 1997Changes in toxicity and mobility resulting from bioremediation processesBioremed J1149163Google Scholar
  24. Luthy, RG, Aiken, GR, Brusseau, ML, Cunningham, SD, Gschwend, PM, Pignatello, JJ,  et al. 1997Sequestration of hydrophobic organic contaminants by geosorbentsEnviron Sci Technol3133413347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mueller, JG, Middaugh, DP, Lantz, SE, Chapman, PJ 1991Biodegradation of creosote and pentachlorophenol in contaminated groundwater: Chemical and biological assessmentAppl Environ Microbiol5712771285PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Nieman, JKC, Sims, RC, Sims, JL, Sorensen, DL, McLean, JE, Rice, JA 199914C-pyrene bound residue evaluation using MIBK fractionation method for creosote contaminated soilEnviron Sci Technol33776781CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Perminova, IV, Grechishcheva, NY, Kovelevskii, DV, Kudryavtsev, AV, Petrosyan, VS, Matorin, DN 2001Quantification and prediction of the detoxifying properties of humic substances related to their chemical binding to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbonsEnviron Sci Technol3538413848CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Phillips, TM, Liu, D, Seech, AG, Lee, H, Trevors, JT 2000Monitoring bioremediation in creosote-contaminated soils using chemical and toxicity analysisJ Ind Microbiol Biotechnol24132139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Richnow, HH, Annweiler, E, Konig, M, Luth, J-C, Stegmann, R, Garms, C,  et al. 2000Tracing the transformation of stable isotope labeled [1-13C]phenanthrene in a soil bioreactorEnviron Pollut10891101CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Roos, PH, Afferden, M, Strotkamp, D, Tappe, D, Pfeifer, F, Hanstein, WG 1996Liver microsomal levels of cytochrome P450IA1 as a biomarker for exposure and bioavailability of soil-bound polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbonsArch Environ Contam Toxicol30107113CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Rüttimann-Johnson, C, Lamar, RT 1996Polymerization of pentachlorophenol and ferulic acid by fungal extracellular lignin-degrading enzymesAppl Environ Microbiol6238903893PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Schacht, S, Sinder, C, Pfeifer, F, Klein, J 1999Bioassays for risk assessment of coal conversion productsAppl Microbiol Biotechnol52127130CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Scheunert, I, Attar, A, Zelles, L 1995Ecotoxicological effects of soil-bound pentachlorophenol residues on the microflora of soilsChemosphere3019952009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Selifonov, SA, Chapman, PJ, Akkerman, SB, Gurst, JE, Bortiatynski, JM, Nanny, MA,  et al. 1998Use of 13C nuclear magnetic resonance to assess fossil fuel biodegradation: fate of [1-13C]acenaphthene in creosote polycyclic aromatic compound mixtures degraded by bacteriaAppl Environ Microbiol6414471453PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Senesi, N, Miano, TM 1995

    The role of abiotic interactions with humic substances on the environmental impact of organic pollutants

    Huang, PMBerthelin, JBollag, J.-MMcGill, WBPage, AL eds. Environmental impact of soil component interactions. Volume ICRC PressBoca Raton, FL311335
    Google Scholar
  36. Sims RC, Abbott CK (1993) Evaluation of mechanisms of alteration and humification of PAHs for water quality management (United States Geological Survey report no. G-1723). United States Geological Survey, Reston, VAGoogle Scholar
  37. Singh, DK, Agarwal, HC 1992Chemical release and nature of soil-bound DDT residuesJ Agric Food Chem4017131716CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Tang, J, Carroquino, MJ, Robertson, BK, Alexander, M 1998Combined effect of sequestration and bioremediation in reducing the bioavailability of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbonsEnviron Sci Technol3235863590CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. United States Environmental Protection Agency (1996) Champion International Superfund Site, Libby, Montana: Bioremediation field performance evaluation of the prepared bed land treatment system (EPA-600/R-95/156). United States Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  40. United States Environmental Protection Agency (2000) Delisting technical support document, appendix A–chemical specific data. U.S. EPA region 6, Multimedia Planning and Permitting Division, RCRA Delisting Team, and U.S. EPA Office of Solid WasteGoogle Scholar
  41. White, JC, Quinones-Rivera, A, Alexander, M 1998Effect of wetting and drying on the bioavailability of organic compounds sequestered in soilEnviron Toxicol Chem1723782382CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. K. C. Nieman
    • 1
  • R. C. Sims
    • 2
  • D. L. Sorensen
    • 1
  • J. E. McLean
    • 1
  1. 1.Utah Water Research Laboratory Utah State UniversityLoganUSA
  2. 2.Department of Biological and Irrigation EngineeringUtah State UniversityLoganUSA

Personalised recommendations