Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The potential of at-home prediction of the formation of urolithiasis by simple multi-frequency electrical conductivity of the urine and the comparison of its performance with urine ion-related indices, color and specific gravity

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Urolithiasis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is important to control daily diet, water intake and life style as well as monitor the quality of urine for urolithiasis prevention. For decades, many ion-related indices have been developed for predicting the formation of urinary stones or urolithiasis, such as EQUILs, relative supersaturation (RSS), Tiselius indices (TI), Robertson risk factor algorithms (RRFA) and more recently, the Bonn risk index. However, they mostly demand robust laboratory analysis, are work-intensive, and even require complex computational programs to get the concentration patterns of several urine analytes. A simple and fast platform for measuring multi-frequency electrical conductivity (MFEC) of morning spot urine (random urine) to predict the onset of urolithiasis was implemented in this study. The performance thereof was compared to ion-related indices, urine color and specific gravity. The concentrations of relevant ions, color, specific gravity (SG) and MFEC (MFEC tested at 1, 10, 100, 5001 KHz and 1 MHz) of 80 random urine samples were examined after collection. Then, the urine samples were stored at 4 °C for 24 h to determine whether sedimentation would occur or not. Ion-activity product index of calcium oxalate (AP(CaOx) EQ2) was calculated. The correlation between AP(CaOx) EQ2, urine color, SG and MFEC were analyzed. AP(CaOx) EQ2, urine color and MFEC (at 5 frequencies) all demonstrated good prediction (p = 0.01, 0.01, 0.01, respectively) for stone formation. The positive correlation between AP(CaOx) EQ2 and MFEC is also significant (p = 0.01). MFEC provides a good metric for predicting the onset of urolithiasis, which is comparable to conventional ion-related indices and urine color. This technology can be implemented with much ease for objectively monitoring the quality of urine at points-of-care or at home.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ghani KR, Roghmann F, Sammon JD, Trudeau V, Sukumar S, Rahbar H, Kumar R, Karakiewicz PI, Peabody JO, Menon M, Sun M, Trinh QD (2014) Emergency department visits in the United States for upper urinary tract stones: trends in hospitalization and charges. J Urol 91(1):90–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Scales CD Jr, Smith AC, Hanley JM, Saigal CS (2012) Prevalence of kidney stones in the United States. Urologic diseases in America project. Eur Urol 62(1):160–165

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Croppi E, Ferraro PM, Taddei L, Gambaro G, GEA Firenze Study Group (2012) Prevalence of renal stones in an Italian urban population: a general practice-based study. Urol Res 40(5):517–522

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Trinchieri A (2006) Epidemiological trends in urolithiasis: impact on our health care systems. Urol Res 34(2):151–156

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sun LM, Lin CL, Chang YJ, Liang JA, Liu SH, Sung FC, Kao CH (2013) Urinary tract stone raises subsequent risk for urinary tract cancer: a population-based cohort study. BJU Int 112(8):1150–1155

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Tiselius HG (2013) Urinary tract stone disease: are all problems solved? Scand J Urol. 47(1):4–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Amaro CR, Goldberg J, Damasio PC, Leitão VA, Turney B, Padovani CR, Amaro JL (2014) An update on metabolic assessment in patients with urinary lithiasis. World J Urol (epub ahead of print)

  8. Parks JH, Coe FL (1996) The financial effects of kidney stone prevention. Kidney Int 50(5):1706–1712

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Momohara C, Tsujihata M, Yoshioka I, Tsujimura A, Nonomura N, Okuyama AJ (2009) Mechanism underlying the low prevalence of pediatric calcium oxalate urolithiasis. Urol 182(3):1201–1209

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Tiselius HG (2011) A hypothesis of calcium stone formation: an interpretation of stone research during the past decades. Urol Res 39(4):231–243

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Pak CY, Moe OW, Maalouf NM, Zerwekh JE, Poindexter JR, Adams-Huet B (2009) Comparison of semi-empirical and computer derived methods for estimating urinary saturation of brushite. J Urol 181(3):1423–1428

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Pak CY, Rodgers K, Poindexter JR, Sakhaee K (2008) New methods of assessing crystal growth and saturation of brushite in whole urine: effect of pH, calcium and citrate. J Urol 180(4):1532–1537

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Porowski T, Kirejczyk JK, Zoch-Zwierz W, Konstantynowicz J, Korzeniecka-Kozerska A, Motkowski R, Laube N (2010) Assessment of lithogenic risk in children based on a morning spot urine sample. J Urol 184(5):2103–2108

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Porowski T, Mrozek P, Sidun J, Zoch-Zwierz W, Konstantynowicz J, Kirejczyk JK, Motkowski R, Laube N (2010) Bonn risk index based micromethod for assessing risk of urinary calcium oxalate stone formation. J Urol 183(3):1157–1162

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Robertson WG (2012) Methods for diagnosing the risk factors of stone formation. Arab J Urol 10(3):250–257

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Ogawa Y, Hatano T (1996) Comparison of the Equil2 program and other methods for estimating the ion-activity product of urinary calcium oxalate: a new simplified method is proposed. Int J Urol 3(5):383–385

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Schwan HP (1994) Electrical properties of tissues and cell suspensions mechanisms and models. In: Proceedings of IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, pp A70–A71

  18. Kavukcu S, Turkmen M, Soylu A, Kuralay F (1998) Could conductivity be used as a parameter in urinalysis? J Pak Med Assoc 48(8):238–240

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Fazil Marikcar YM (2010) Electrical conductivity and total dissolved solids in urine. J Urol Res 38(4):233–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Tiselius HG (1992) Calcium oxalate crystallization properties in urine with different specific electrical conductivities. J Urol 148:990–994

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Armstrong LE, Maresh CM, Castellani JW, Bereron MF, Kenefick RW, LaGassee KE, Riebe D (1994) Urinary indices of hydration status. Int J Sport Nutr 4:265–279

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kenefick RW, Heavens KR, Dennis WE, Caruso EM, Guerriere KI, Charkoudian N, Cheuvront SN (2015) Quantification of chromatographic effects of vitamin B supplementation in urine and implications for hydration assessment. J Appl Physiol. doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00068.2015

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Theka T, Rodgers AL, Webber D, O’Ryan C (2014) Variability in kidney stone incidence between black and white South Africans: AGT Pro11Leu polymorphism is not a factor. J Endo Urol. 28(5):577–581

    Google Scholar 

  24. Payton S (2011) Stones: morning spot urine samples are better than 24 h urine for assessment of lithogenic risk in children. Nat Rev Urol 1:6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Tiselius HG (2013) A proposed method for approximate estimates of the ion-activity products of calcium oxalate and calcium phosphate in spot-urine samples or in urine samples collected during less well defined periods of time. Urolithiasis 41(2):105–109

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Wu W et al (2015) Collection and storage of urine specimens for measurement of urolithiasis risk factors. Urology 85(2):299–303

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Baumann JM, Affolter B, Caprez U, Henze U (2003) Calcium oxalate aggregation in whole urine, new aspects of calcium stone formation and metaphylaxis. Eur Urol 43(4):421–425

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Baumann JM, Affolter B, Casella R (2011) Aggregation of freshly precipitated calcium oxalate crystals in urine of calcium stone patients and controls. Urol Res 39(6):421–427

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Guerra A, Allegri F, Meschi T, Adorni G, Prati B, Nouvenne A, Novarini A, Maggiore U, Fiaccadori E, Borghi L (2005) Effects of urine dilution on quantity, size and aggregation of calcium oxalate crystals induced in vitro by an oxalate load. Clin Chem Lab Med 43(6):585–589

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Trinchieri A (2013) Diet and renal stone formation. Minerva Med 104(1):41–54

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Lotan Y, Daudon M, Bruyère F, Talaska G, Strippoli G, Johnson RJ, Tack I (2013) Impact of fluid intake in the prevention of urinary system diseases: a brief review. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens 22(Suppl 1):S1–S10

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Meschi T, Nouvenne A, Borghi L (2011) Lifestyle recommendations to reduce the risk of kidney stones. Urol Clin North Am 38(3):313–320

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vincent F. S. Tsai.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Nil.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Silverio, A.A., Chung, WY., Cheng, C. et al. The potential of at-home prediction of the formation of urolithiasis by simple multi-frequency electrical conductivity of the urine and the comparison of its performance with urine ion-related indices, color and specific gravity. Urolithiasis 44, 127–134 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-015-0812-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-015-0812-2

Keywords

Navigation