Skip to main content

Retrograde intrarenal surgery versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with significant comorbidities and solitary kidney

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Hosseini MM, Yousefi A, Hassanpour A, Jahanbini S, Zaki-Abbasi M (2014) Percutaneous nephrolithotomy in solitary kidneys: experience with 412 cases from Southern Iran. Urolithiasis (Epub ahead of print)

  2. Breda A, Ogunyemi O, Leppert JT, Lam JS, Schulam PG (2008) Flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy for single intrarenal stones 2 cm or greater—is this the new frontier? J Urol 179(3):981–984

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Youssef A, Esmat M, Wael M (2012) When prone position is contraindicated or not preferable, can supine percutaneous nephrolithotomy solve the problem? Int Braz J Urol 38(1):57–62

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Senol Adanur.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Adanur, S., Aydin, H.R., Mohamed, O. et al. Retrograde intrarenal surgery versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with significant comorbidities and solitary kidney. Urolithiasis 43, 385–386 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-015-0764-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-015-0764-6

Keywords

  • Morbid Obesity
  • Prone Position
  • Renal Stone
  • Significant Comorbidities
  • Solitary Kidney