Skip to main content
Log in

The change in upper tract urolithiasis composition, surgical treatments and outcomes of para and quadriplegic patients over time

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Urolithiasis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Stone disease in patients with spinal cord injury is a source of morbidity and mortality. Previous studies have indicated a decrease in infection-based urolithiasis in recent decades. We aimed to identify changes in stone composition and surgical outcomes in patients with para and quadriplegia over time. A retrospective review of para and quadriplegic patients from 1986 to 2011 who underwent surgical intervention for urolithiasis was performed, identifying 95 patients. The Mantel–Haenszel Chi square test was used to compare change in stone composition over time. The mean patient age was 44.0 years (range 18–88) and treatment included percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) 40 (42.1 %), ureteroscopy 28 (29.5 %), shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) 26 (27.4 %), and nephrectomy 1 (1 %). Overall stone-free status was found in 47.4 % with 19.0 % requiring a repeat procedure. The median hospital stay for patients undergoing SWL was 2.5 days, ureteroscopy 5 days, and PCNL 6 days. Infection-based stone composition was identified in 23 patients (36.5 %). We evaluated the linear change in percent of each stone component over time and identified increasing components of calcium oxalate dihydrate (p = 0.002) and calcium carbonate (p = 0.009). However, over a period of 25 years, the incidence of infection-based stone did not change (p = 0.57). Para and quadriplegic patients with urolithiasis can be difficult to treat surgically with prolonged hospitalizations, low stone-free status, and often require additional procedures. Despite improvements in antibiotic agents and management of neurogenic bladders, infection-based calculi continue to be a significant source of morbidity to this patient population.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hansen RB, Biering-Sorensen F F, Kristensen JK (2007) Urinary calculi following traumatic spinal cord injury. Scand J Urol Nephrol 41:115–119

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Hall MK, Hackler RH, Zampieri TA et al (1989) Renal calculi in spinal cord-injured patient: association with reflux, bladder stones, and foley catheter drainage. Urology 34:126–128

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Chen Y, DeVivo MJ, Stover SL et al (2002) Recurrent kidney stone: a 25-year follow-up study in persons with spinal cord injury. Urology 60:228–232

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Burr RG (1978) Urinary calculi composition in patients with spinal cord lesions. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 59:84–88

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Donnellan SM, Bolton DM (1999) The impact of contemporary bladder management techniques on struvite calculi associated with spinal cord injury. BJU Int 84:280–285

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Matlaga BR, Kim SC, Watkins SL et al (2006) Changing composition of renal calculi in patients with neurogenic bladder. J Urol 175:1716–1719

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gnessin E, Mandeville JA, Handa SE et al (2011) Changing composition of renal calculi in patients with musculoskeletal anomalies. J Endourol 25:1519–1523

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ost MC, Lee BR (2006) Urolithiasis in patients with spinal cord injuries: risk factors, management, and outcomes. Curr Opin Urol 16:93–99

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Nikakhtar B, Vaziri ND, Khonsari F et al (1981) Urolithiasis in patients with spinal cord injury. Paraplegia 19:363–366

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Parks JH, Worcester EM, Coe FL et al (2004) Clinical implications of abundant calcium phosphate in routinely analyzed kidney stones. Kidney Int 66:777–785

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Gault MH, Chafe L (2000) Relationship of frequency, age, sex, stone weight and composition in 15,624 stones: comparison of results for 1980 to 1983 and 1995 to 1998. J Urol 164:302–307

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Deliveliotis C, Picramenos D, Kostakopoulos A et al (1994) Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy in paraplegic and quadriplegic patients. Int Urol Nephrol 26:151–154

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Lawrentschuk N, Pan D, Grills R et al (2005) Outcome from percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with spinal cord injury, using a single-stage dilator for access. BJU Int 96:379–384

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

None.

Conflict of interest

Dr. Amy Krambeck, HistoSonics, Consultant; Dr. Marisa M. Clifton, M.D.; Matthew T. Gettman, M.D.; David E. Patterson, M.D.; Laureano Rangel—No competing financial interests exist. All authors have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical standard

This study has been approved by the Mayo Clinic Institutional Review Board and has therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments. This is a retrospective review and therefore informed consent could not feasibly be obtained from every patient. This study does not contain prospective clinical studies and all patients were deidentified prior to inclusion in our data set.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amy E. Krambeck.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Clifton, M.M., Gettman, M.T., Patterson, D.E. et al. The change in upper tract urolithiasis composition, surgical treatments and outcomes of para and quadriplegic patients over time. Urolithiasis 42, 415–419 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-014-0681-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-014-0681-0

Keywords

Navigation