Skip to main content
Log in

Retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy for non-functioning kidneys related to renal stone disease

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Urological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 07 July 2012


Laparoscopic nephrectomy has become the gold standard procedure for nonfunctioning or symptomatic benign kidneys due to renal calculi, obstructive, refluxive, and inflammatory nephropathies or renovascular hypertension. We aimed to investigate the effect of renal calculi as a reason of non-functioning on the progress and complication rates of the retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy (RPN).During a 2-year period, 108 patients with benign renal conditions underwent RPN by single surgeon. Among these patients, total of 27 (Group 1) with a non-functioning kidney due to renal calculi were retrospectively compared with 27 patients (Group 2) with other benign renal conditions. The two groups were matched for age, body mass index, and previous renal surgery. We analyzed operative and post-operative findings and complications. The mean age and the BMI of the groups were similar. The operation time was significantly longer in Group 1 than Group 2 (p = 0.0001). There was no significant difference between the groups with respect to mean hemoglobin drop postoperatively (p = 0.9) and hospitalization time (p = 0.06). The perioperative and postoperative complication rates were higher in Group 1 but not statistically different from Group 2 (p = 0.19, p = 0.29, respectively). RPN for nonfunctioning calculous kidneys is more challenging procedure and is associated with prolonged operation time related to difficult dissection of dense adhesions. It can be safely performed by experienced hands with similar perioperative and postoperative complication rates as well as for other benign conditions of the kidney.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others



Laparoscopic nephrectomy


Retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy




Percutaneous nephrolithotomy


Shockwave lithotripsy


Body mass index


Policystic kidney disease


Ureteropelvic junction




Intravenous pyelography


Computed tomography


Dimercaptosuccinic acid


Urinary tract infection


  1. Clayman RV, Kavoussi LR, Soper NJ et al (2001) Laparoscopic nephrectomy: initial case report. J Urol 146:278–282

    Google Scholar 

  2. Raghuram S, Godbole HC, Dasgupta P (2005) Laparoscopic nephrectomy: the new gold standard? Int J Clin Pract 59(2):128–129

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Gupta NP, Hemal AK, Mishra S et al (2008) Outcome of retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy for benign nonfunctioning kidney: a single-center experience. J Endourol 22:693–697

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Keeley FX, Tolley DA (1998) A review of our first 100 cases of laparoscopic nephrectomy: defining risk factors for complications. Br J Urol 82:615–618

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hemal AK, Goel A, Kumar M et al (2001) Evaluation of laparoscopic retroperitoneal surgery in urinary stone disease. J Endourol 15:701–705

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hemal AK, Mishra S (2010) Retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy for pyonephrotic nonfunctioning kidney. Urology 75(3):585–588

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Aminsharifi A, Taddayun A, Niroomand R et al (2011) Laparoscopic nephrectomy for nonfunctioning kidneys is feasible after previous ipsilateral renal surgery: a prospective cohort trial. J Urol 185:930–934

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Teber D, Tefekli A, Eskicorapci S et al (2006) Retroperitoneoscopy: a versatile access for many urologic indications. Eur Urol Supp 5:975–982

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Satava RM (2005) Identification and reduction of surgical error using simulation. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 14(4):257–261

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of a 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240:205–213

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Daudon M, Lancour B, Jungers P (1992) Urolithiasis in patients with end stage renal failure. J Urol 147:977–980

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Caralps A, Lloveras J, Andreu J (1979) Urinary calculi in chronic dialysis patients. Lancet 2:1024–1025

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Singh I, Gupta NP, Hemal AK et al (2001) Efficacy and outcome of surgical intervention in patients with nephrolithiasis and chronic renal failure. Int Urol Nephrol 33(2):293–298

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Duarte RJ, Mitre AI, Chambô JL et al (2008) Laparoscopic nephrectomy outside gerota fascia for management of inflammatory kidney. J Endourol 22:681–686

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Matin SF, Abreu S, Ramani A et al (2003) Evaluation of age and comorbidity as risk factors after laparoscopic urological surgery. J Urol 170:1115–1120

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lai FC, Kau EL, Ng CS et al (2007) Laparoscopic nephrectomy outcomes of elderly patients in the 21st century. J Endourol 21:1309–1313

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Makiyama K, Nakaigawa N, Miyoshi Y et al (2008) Retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy in overweight and obese Japanese patients: complications and outcomes. Urol Int 81:427–430

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Gong EM, Orvieto MA, Lyon MB et al (2007) Analysis of impact of body mass index on outcomes of laparoscopic renal surgery. Urology 69:38–43

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Fugita OE, Chan DY, Roberts WW et al (2004) Laparoscopic radical nephrectomy in obese patients: outcomes and technical considerations. Urology 63:247–252

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Doublet J, Belair G (2000) Retroperitoneal laparoscopic nephrectomy is safe and effective in obese patients: a comparative study of 55 procedures. Urology 56:63–66

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Hsiao W, Pattaras JG (2008) Not so “simple” laparoscopic nephrectomy: outcomes and complications of a 7-year experience. J Endourol 22:2285–2290

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Gill IS, Kavoussi LR, Clayman RV et al (1995) Complications of laparoscopic nephrectomy in 185 patients: a multi-institutional review. J Urol 154:479–483

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Mita K, Shigeta M, Mutaguchi K et al (2005) Urological retroperitoneoscopic surgery for patients with prior intra-abdominal surgery. Eur Urol 48(1):97–101

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Turna B, Aron M, Frota R et al (2008) Feasibility of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy after previous ipsilateral renal procedures. Urology 72:584–588

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Shapiro EY, Cho JS, Srinivasan A et al (2009) Long-term follow-up for salvage laparoscopic pyeloplasty after failed open pyeloplasty. Urology 73:115–118

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Challacombe B, Sahai A, Murphy D et al (2007) Laparoscopic retroperitoneal nephrectomy for giant hydronephrosis: when simple nephrectomy isn’t simple. J Endourol 21:437–440

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kapoor R, Vijjan V, Singh K et al (2006) Is laparoscopic nephrectomy the preferred approach in xanthogranulomatous pyelonephritis? Urology 68:952–955

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Manohar T, Desai M, Desai M (2007) Laparoscopic nephrectomy for benign and inflammatory conditions. J Endourol 21:1323–1328

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Shekarriz B, Meng MV, Lu HF et al (2001) Laparoscopic nephrectomy for inflammatory renal conditions. J Urol 166(6):2091–2094

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Moore RG, Chen RN, Hedican SP (1998) Laparoscopic subcapsular nephrectomy. J Endourol 12:263–264

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Gill IS, Clayman RV, Albala DM et al (1998) Retroperitoneal and pelvic extraperitoneal laparoscopy: an international perspective. Urology 52:566–571

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abdulkadir Tepeler.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tepeler, A., Akman, T., Tok, A. et al. Retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy for non-functioning kidneys related to renal stone disease. Urol Res 40, 559–565 (2012).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: