Skip to main content
Log in

Initial experience with a newly developed antirefluxive ureter stent

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Urological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The objective of this study was to assess the functional efficacy of newly developed antirefluxive ureter stents (DJ), by performing immediate post-stenting cystograms on patients with acute ureteral obstruction requiring a DJ stent, and assessing stent-related symptoms by means of ureteral stent symptoms questionnaire (USSQ). Patients with acute hydronephrosis requiring internal drainage were randomized to receive either an antirefluxive DJ or a conventional DJ (7 Fr., 26 cm, polyurethane, Urovision®, Germany). Mean stone size was 6.64 ± 3.33 and 6.5  ± 3.54 mm. Immediately after correct placement of the DJ, 200 ml of diluted contrast media was introduced into the bladder under fluoroscopic control to detect vesicoureteral reflux (VUR). Patients completed German versions of the USSQ on days 2 and 7 following stent placement, and 1 week after stent removal. The results were analyzed. 13 conventional and 16 antirefluxive stents were placed in 29 patients. Reflux was documented in eight conventionally stented patients (62.5%). Two of the 16 patients with antirefluxive stents (22%) presented reflux. 1 week after stent implantation, the mean pain value was 1.1 in the antirefluxive group and 3 in the standard group (p < 0.062). Flank pain during micturition occurred after 2 days in seven patients (58%) with standard stents and in three patients (33%) with antirefluxive stents (p < 0.23). 1 week after stent insertion, flank pain had dropped to 40% in the standard group and 11% in the antirefluxive group (p < 0.3). Our initial experience showed that the antirefluxive system might be effective in terms of reflux prevention and reduction of stent related symptoms especially during sexual intercourse.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

cm:

Centimeter

DJ:

Ureter stent

Fr.:

French

ml:

Milliliter

mm:

Millimeter

No.:

Number

USSQ:

Ureteral stent symptoms questionnaire

VUR:

Vesicoureteral reflux

y:

Years

References

  1. Zimskind PD, Fetter TR, Wilkerson JL (1967) Clinical use of long-term indwelling silicone rubber ureteral splints inserted cystoscopically. J Urol 97(5):840–844

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Chew BH, Knudsen BE, Denstedt JD (2004) The use of stents in contemporary urology. Curr Opin Urol 14(2):111–115. doi:10.1097/00042307-200403000-00011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Chew BH, Knudsen BE, Nott L, Pautler SE, Razvi H, Amann J, Denstedt JD (2007) Pilot study of ureteral movement in stented patients: first step in understanding dynamic ureteral anatomy to improve stent comfort. J Endourol 21(9):1069–1075. doi:10.1089/end.2006.0252

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Joshi HB, Okeke A, Newns N, Keeley FX Jr, Timoney AG (2002) Characterization of urinary symptoms in patients with ureteral stents. Urology 59(4):511–516. doi:S0090429501016442

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Joshi HB, Stainthorpe A, MacDonagh RP, Keeley FX Jr, Timoney AG, Barry MJ (2003) Indwelling ureteral stents: evaluation of symptoms, quality of life and utility. J Urol 169(3):1065–1069. doi:10.1097/01.ju.0000048980.33855.90

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Chew BH, Lange D (2009) Ureteral stent symptoms and associated infections: a biomaterials perspective. Nat Rev Urol 6(8):440–448. doi:10.1038/nrurol.2009.124

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ho CH, Chen SC, Chung SD, Lee YJ, Chen J, Yu HJ, Huang KH (2008) Determining the appropriate length of a double-pigtail ureteral stent by both stent configurations and related symptoms. J Endourol 22(7):1427–1431. doi:10.1089/end.2008.0037

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ahmadzadeh M (1992) Flap valve ureteral stent with an antireflux function: a review of 46 cases. Urol Int 48(4):466–468

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Joshi HB, Newns N, Stainthorpe A, MacDonagh RP, Keeley FX Jr, Timoney AG (2003) Ureteral stent symptom questionnaire: development and validation of a multidimensional quality of life measure. J Urol 169(3):1060–1064. doi:10.1097/01.ju.0000049198.53424

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Dyer RB, Chen MY, Zagoria RJ, Regan JD, Hood CG, Kavanagh PV (2002) Complications of ureteral stent placement. Radiographics 22(5):1005–1022

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Deliveliotis C, Chrisofos M, Gougousis E, Papatsoris A, Dellis A, Varkarakis IM (2006) Is there a role for alpha1-blockers in treating double-J stent-related symptoms? Urology 67(1):35–39. doi:S0090-4295(05)01142-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Maan Z, Patel D, Moraitis K, El-Husseiny T, Papatsoris AG, Buchholz NP, Masood J (2010) Comparison of stent-related symptoms between conventional Double-J stents and a new-generation thermoexpandable segmental metallic stent: a validated-questionnaire-based study. J Endourol 24(4):589–593. doi:10.1089/end.2009.0318

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Yossepowitch O, Lifshitz DA, Dekel Y, Ehrlich Y, Gur U, Margel D, Livne PM, Baniel J (2005) Assessment of vesicoureteral reflux in patients with self-retaining ureteral stents: implications for upper urinary tract instillation. J Urol 173(3):890–893. doi:10.1097/01.ju.0000147747.89028.64

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Brewer AV, Elbahnasy AM, Bercowsky E, Maxwell KL, Shalhav AL, Kahn SA, McDougall EM, Clayman RV (1999) Mechanism of ureteral stent flow: a comparative in vivo study. J Endourol 13(4):269–271

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Olweny EO, Landman J, Andreoni C, Collyer W, Kerbl K, Onciu M, Valimaa T, Clayman RV (2002) Evaluation of the use of a biodegradable ureteral stent after retrograde endopyelotomy in a porcine model. J Urol 167(5):2198–2202. doi:S0022-5347(05)65128-2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hubner WA, Plas EG, Stoller ML (1992) The double-J ureteral stent: in vivo and in vitro flow studies. J Urol 148(2 Pt 1):278–280

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

No competing financial interests exist.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manuel Ritter.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ritter, M., Krombach, P., Knoll, T. et al. Initial experience with a newly developed antirefluxive ureter stent. Urol Res 40, 349–353 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-011-0415-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-011-0415-5

Keywords

Navigation