Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Treatment of forgotten ureteral stents: how much does it really cost? A cost-effectiveness study in 27 patients

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Urological Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aim of study was to present costs of forgotten ureteral stents extraction so as to distract attentions of the urologists on this issue. Medical files of 27 accessible patients who referred to our clinics between 2001 and 2010 because of forgotten ureteral stent were retrospectively analyzed. The indwelling time of double-j stents (DJS) was calculated from the time of its insertion. Costs related to radiological investigations, all invasive, and noninvasive interventions, duration of hospital stay, and medical treatments used were calculated. These estimations were based on 2010 prices determined by Turkey Ministry of Health. Mean age of the patients was 31.2 (8–86 years) years. Mean indwelling time of ureteral DJSs was 36.7 months (14–84 months). Seventy-one [extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL), n = 26; invasive/noninvasive interventions, n = 32] procedures were applied for 27 patients. In six patients without incrustation, after a single session of ESWL DJSs could be removed cystoscopically. A various combination of a multimodal therapy was used for other 21 patients. Total financial burden of 27 patients was US $ 34,300. Cost of treatment was estimated to be 6.9-fold (1.8- to 21-fold) higher than an average timely stent extraction. Financial burden of the treatments increased in parallel with the duration of the stent retention (p = 0.001). Management of forgotten DJS is time consuming, difficult, complicated, risky, and costly. Therefore; financial burden, increased labour loss, and impaired quality of life brought by the application of these modalities must not be forgotten.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

DJS:

Double-J stents

FUSs:

Forgotten double-J stents

KÜB:

Kidney üreter bladder graphy

US:

Urinary ultrasound

ESWL:

Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy

SCSR:

Simple cystoscopic stent retrieval

EnCL:

Endoscopic cystolithotripsy

Pccl:

Percutaneous cystolithotripsy

URS:

Ureteroscopy

URS-SE:

Urteroscopic-stone extraction

PCNL:

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy

PcN:

Percutaneous nephrostomies

References

  1. Chen ASC, Saltzman B (1993) Stent use with extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. J Endourol 7:155–162

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Giustacchini M, Tazza L, Raguso M, Albino G (1999) Ureteral stent forgotten in renal transplanted patient: its removal. Arch Ital Urol Androl 71(4):223–224

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Aron M, Ansari MS, Singh I, Gautam G, Kolla SB, Seth A, Gupta NP (2006) Forgotten ureteral stents causing renal failure: multimodal endourological treatment. J Endourol 20(6):423–428

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Autorino R, Maschio A, Pane U, De Sio M, Cosentino L, Quarto G, Mordente S, Di Giacomo F, Santini L, D’Armiento M (2006) The forgotten stent: late complication in a patient with neobladder. ScientificWorldJournal 6:410–412

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Thomas JA, Fenn NJ, Ponsford A, Bowsher WG (1998) Br Extraction by extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of a forgotten ureteric stent after cystectomy. J Urol 81(4):643–644

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. El Faqih SR, Shamsuddin AB, Chakrabarti A et al (1995) Polyurethane internal urethral stents in treatment of stone patients: morbidity related to indwelling times. J Urol 153:1817–1820

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Robert M, Boularan AM, El Sandid M et al (1997) Double J ureteric stent encrustations: clinical study on crystal formation on polyurethane stents. Urol Int 58:100–103

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kadıoğlu TC, Tefekli A, Esen T, Tunç M (1998) Mechanical complications of double-J ureteral stents and ureterorenoscopy application. J Turkish Urol 24:159–163

    Google Scholar 

  9. Tsai CC, Shen JT, Huang SP, Chang SF, Tsai LJ, Wu WJ, Huang CH, Kaohsiung J (2009) Use of a holmium laser to treat a forgotten double-J stent with whole stent encrustations: a case report. Med Sci 25(10):567–571

    Google Scholar 

  10. Eisenberg ML, Lee KL, Stoller ML (2009) Endoscopic management of retained renal foreign bodies. Urology 73(6):1189–1194 (Epub 2009 Apr 10)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Vanderbrink BA, Rastinehad AR, Ost MC, Smith AD (2008) Encrusrated urinary stents: evaluation and endourologic management. J Endourol 22(5):905–912

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kehinde EO, Al-Awadi KA, Tawheed A et al (2001) Factors affecting the fate of prolonged forgotten ‘J’ stents. Scand J Urol Nephrol 35:222

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. McCahy PJ, Ramsden PD (1996) A computerized ureteric stent retrieval system. Br J Urol 77(1):147–148

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ather MH, Talati J, Biyabani R (2000) Physician responsibility for removal of implants: the case for a computerized program for tracking overdue double-J stents. Tech Urol 6(3):189–192

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Lynch MF, Ghani KR, Frost I, Anson KM (2007) Preventing the forgotten ureteral stent: implementation of a web-based stent registry with automatic recall application. Urology 70(3):423–426

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Thomas AZ, Casey RG, Grainger R, McDermott T, Flynn R, Thornhill JA (2007) The forgotten ureteric JJ stent and its prevention: a prospective audit of the value of a ureteric stent logbook. Ir J Med Sci 176(2):117–119

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Tang VC, Gillooly J, Lee EW, Charig CR (2008) Ureteric stent card register: a 5-year retrospective analysis. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 90(2):156–159

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/results?term=turkey+stent+sms&view=results

  19. Monga M, Klein E, Castañeda-Zúñiga WR, Thomas R (1995) The forgotten indwelling ureteral stent: a urological dilemma. J Urol 153(6):1817–1819

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Finney RP (1982) Double-J and diversion stents. Urol Clin North Am 9:89–91

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Singh I, Gupta NP, Hemal AK et al (2001) Severely encrusted polyurethane ureteral stents: management and analysis of potential risk factors. Urology 58(4):526–531

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Thierry AF, Michel B, Zerbib M et al (1990) ESWL to remove calcified ureteral stents. J Endourol 26:164–165

    Google Scholar 

  23. Murthy KV, Reddy SJ, Prasad DV (2010) Endourological management of forgotten encrusted ureteral stents. Int Braz J Urol. 36(4):420–429

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Santin M, Motta A, Denyer SP et al (1999) Effect of the urine conditioning film on ureteral stent encrustation and characterization of its protein composition. Biomaterials 20:1245–1251

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Acosta-Miranda AM, Milner J, Turk TM (2009) The FECal Double-J: a simplified approach in the management of encrusted and retained ureteral stents. J Endourol 23(3):409–415

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Lojanapiwat B (2005) Endourologic management of severely encrusted ureteral stents. J Med Assoc Thai 88(9):1203–1206

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Karalezli G, Gögüş O, Bedük Y, Köküuslu C, Sarica K, Kutsal O (1993) Histopathologic effects of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy on rabbit kidney. Urol Res 21(1):67–70

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Shandera KC (1997) Minimally invasive management of the calcified ureteral stent. Tech Urol 3:54–57

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Urology, University of Dicle, Diyarbakır, Turkey

    Ahmet Ali Sancaktutar, Haluk Söylemez, Yasar Bozkurt, Necmettin Penbegül & Murat Atar

Authors
  1. Ahmet Ali Sancaktutar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Haluk Söylemez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yasar Bozkurt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Necmettin Penbegül
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Murat Atar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ahmet Ali Sancaktutar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Sancaktutar, A.A., Söylemez, H., Bozkurt, Y. et al. Treatment of forgotten ureteral stents: how much does it really cost? A cost-effectiveness study in 27 patients. Urol Res 40, 317–325 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-011-0409-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-011-0409-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation