Skip to main content

Urologists versus radiologists made PCNL tracts: the UK experience

Abstract

We aim to explore the practice of who makes the PCNL tract in the UK and Northern Ireland as well as presenting our data for two different approaches to PCNL tracts in Northern Ireland. A national questionnaire survey was carried out across the National Health Services hospitals in UK. In addition, a retrospective analysis of 134 PCNL cases was carried out. Group I included 103 (77%) cases with urologist-made tracts, while group II included 31 (23%) cases with radiologists-made tracts. The survey suggested that 45% (42) of the hospitals adopted a radiologist-made tract, 44% (41) use urologist-made tract, while the remaining 11% (11) use both. Most of the radiologists’ performed tracts in our series were for complex cases. Failed access occurred in 6 (5.8%) in group I and none in Group II. The overall stone-free rate was 92 and 50% for group I and II, respectively. There is a better stone clearance rate in Group I (p = 0.0016). This however is likely to be attributed to the complexity of the cases in group II. However, urologist made percutaneous tract is safe and efficacious but a team approach with radiology is needed for more complex cases.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

References

  1. Rupel E, Brown R (1941) Nephroscopy with removal of stone following nephrostomy for obstructive calculus anuria. J Urol 46:177–182

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fernstrom I, Johansson B (1976) Percutaneous pyelolithotomy: a new extraction technique. Scand J Urol Nephrol 10:257–259

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Goodwin WE, Casey WC, Woolf W (1955) Percutaneous trocar (needle) nephrostomy in hydronephrosis. JAMA 157:891

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. White EC, Smith AD (1984) Percutaneous stone extraction from 200 patients. J Urol 132:437–438

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Wickham JE, Kellett MJ (1981) Percutaneous nephrolithotomy. BJU 53(4):297–299

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Alken P, Hutschenreiter G, Gunther R et al (1981) Percutaneous stone manipulation. J Urol 125:463–466

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Chaussy C, Brendel W, Schmeidt E (1980) Extracorporeally induced destruction for kidney stones by shock waves. Lancet 2(8207):1265–1268

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Lawrentschuk N, Pan D, Grills R et al (2005) Outcome from percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with spinal cord injury, using a single-stage dilator for access. BJU Int 96:379–384

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Michel MS, Trojan L, Rassweiler JJ (2007) Complications in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Eur Urol 51:899–906

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. de la Rosette JJ, Laguna MP, Rassweiler JJ et al (2008) Training in percutaneous nephrolithotomy—a critical review. Eur Urol 54:994–1001

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lashley DB, Fuchs EF (1998) Urologist-acquired renal access for percutaneous renal surgery. Urology 51(6):927–931

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Mahaffey KG, Bolton DM, Stoller ML (1994) Urologist directed percutaneous nephrostomy tube placement. J Urol 152:1973–1976

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Stoller ML, Wolf JS Jr, St. Lezin MA (1994) Estimated blood loss and transfusion rates associated with percutaneous nephrolithotomy. J Urol 152:1977–1981

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Masood J, Yeo L, Zaman F et al (2009) Should urologists in the UK undertake their own nephrostomies and renal access for endourological procedures: What does the future hold? BJU Int 104(6):755–757

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Matouscheck E (1989) Urologic endoscopic surgery. In: S. Leoing, B.C. Decker (eds). Philadelphia

  16. Segura JW, Patterson DE, Le Roy AJ et al (1985) Percutaneous removal of kidney stones: review of 1000 cases. J Urol 134:1077–1081

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Symons S, Biyani CS, Bhargava S et al (2006) Challenge of percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with spinal neuropathy. Int J Urol 13:874–879

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Culkin DJ, Wheeler JS, Nemchausky BA et al (1986) PCNL in SCI population. J Urol 136:1181–1183

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Muhammad Z. Aslam.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Aslam, M.Z., Thwaini, A., Duggan, B. et al. Urologists versus radiologists made PCNL tracts: the UK experience. Urol Res 39, 217–221 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-010-0338-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-010-0338-6

Keywords

  • Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
  • Urolithiasis
  • Nephrostomy
  • Shock wave lithotripsy