Abstract
The objective of the study is to measure the incidence rate of urolithiasis in a nationwide population-based study by a new methodology. A multi-stage stratified “epsem scheme” sampling was designed among imaging centres in 12 ecologic regions (composed of 30 provinces) while the regions were assumed as independent epidemiologic units. Four temporal phases were determined for sampling to represent four seasons. Imaging-proven positive cases for urinary stones were included and questionnaire filled out by interview. 2,955 new cases of urinary stone were included and the overall pooled yearly incidence rate was 136/100,000 (95% CI, 103–168). The whole positive group had a mean age of 41.5 years (SD = 16.3 years) and composed of 57.9% male. The most common season for presentation of disease was autumn. Geographically, the west and north of Iran, and seasonally, autumn have shown the highest incidence rates for the urinary tract stones. To establish the real burden of urinary stone disease, our study adds a little piece of information to the worldwide epidemiology of urolithiasis.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Yasui T, Iguchi M, Suzuki S et al (2008) Prevalence and epidemiological characteristics of urolithiasis in Japan: national trends between 1965 and 2005. Urology 71(2):209–213. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2007.09.034
Hesse A, Brandle E, Wilbert D et al (2003) Study on the prevalence and incidence of urolithiasis in Germany comparing the years 1979 versus 2000. Eur Urol 44(6):709–713. doi:10.1016/S0302-2838(03)00415-9
Stamatelou KK, Francis ME, Jones CA et al (2003) Time trends in reported prevalence of kidney stones in the United States: 1976–1994. Kidney Int 63(5):1817–1823. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1755.2003.00917.x
Trinchieri A, Coppi F, Montanari E et al (2000) Increase in the prevalence of symptomatic upper urinary tract stones during the last ten years. Eur Urol 37(1):23–25. doi:10.1159/000020094
Curhan GC, Rimm EB, Willett WC et al (1994) Regional variation in nephrolithiasis incidence and prevalence among United States men. J Urol 151(4):838–841
Lieske JC, Pena de la Vega LS, Slezak JM et al (2006) Renal stone epidemiology in Rochester, Minnesota: an update. Kidney Int 69(4):760–764. doi:10.1038/sj.ki.5000150
Safarinejad MR (2007) Adult urolithiasis in a population-based study in Iran: prevalence, incidence, and associated risk factors. Urol Res 35(2):73–82. doi:10.1007/s00240-007-0084-6
Kim H, Jo MK, Kwak C et al (2002) Prevalence and epidemiologic characteristics of urolithiasis in Seoul, Korea. Urology 59(4):517–521. doi:10.1016/S0090-4295(01)01606-5
Yoshida O, Terai A, Ohkawa T et al (1999) National trend of the incidence of urolithiasis in Japan from 1965 to 1995. Kidney Int 56(5):1899–1904. doi:10.1046/j.1523-1755.1999.00754.x
Durr ES, Khan AN, Craig M et al (2004) Sonographic mimics of renal calculi. J Ultrasound Med 23(10):1361–1367
Serio A, Fraioli A (1999) Epidemiology of nephrolithiasis. Nephron 81(Suppl 1):26–30
Indridason OS, Birgisson S, Edvardsson VO et al (2006) Epidemiology of kidney stones in Iceland: a population-based study. Scand J Urol Nephrol 40(3):215–220
Lee YH, Huang WC, Tsai JY et al (2002) Epidemiological studies on the prevalence of upper urinary calculi in Taiwan. Urol Int 68(3):172–177
Yanagawa M, Kawamura J, Onishi T et al (1997) Incidence of urolithiasis in northeast Thailand. Int J Urol 4(6):537–540
Acknowledgments
We thank those members of the Ministry of Health and medical university teams who made this study possible, and in particular Dr. Nahid Jafari. We would also like to thank those imaging centers that provided access to their cases. The authors would like to express their utmost gratitude to all of the participating physicians and the staff of the involved medical centres for supporting the local data collection.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Basiri, A., Shakhssalim, N., Khoshdel, A.R. et al. Regional and seasonal variation in the incidence of urolithiasis in Iran: a place for obsession in case finding and statistical approach. Urol Res 37, 197–204 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-009-0193-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-009-0193-5